The student editorial board of methods of information in medicine - An opportunity to educate tomorrow's peer reviewers

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 623-624

  Aronsky, Dominik ^a   Haux, R ^b   Leong, T Y ^c   McCray, A ^d  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^d Harvard Medical School Center for Biomedical Informatics   (United States)

Author keywords

Education; Medical informatics; Peer review; Periodicals

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PEER REVIEW; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 37349098288     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625418     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Merriam-Webster Online Search (database on the Internet). © 2007 Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, USA (accessed: October 10, 2007). Available from: http://www.webster.com
2. Bourne PE, Korngreen A. Ten simple rules for reviewers. PLoS Comput Biol 2006; 2 (9): e110.
3. Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185 (4): 848-854.
4. Callaham ML, Schriger DL. Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 40 (3): 323-328.
5. Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, Carpenter J, Godlee F, Smith R. Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004; 328 (7441): 673.
6. Shea JA. Reviewer's Recommendation. Acad Med 2001; 76: 952-953.
7. Ammenwerth E, Wolff AC, Knaup P, Ulmer H, Skonetzki S, van Bemmel JH, McCray AT, Haux R, Kulikowski C. Developing and evaluating criteria to help reviewers of biomedical informatics manuscripts. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10(5): 512-514.
8. BMJ British Medical Journal (home page on the Internet). © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd (accessed: October 23, 2007). Available from: http://resources.bmj.com/bmj/reviewers/training-materials
9. Callaham ML, Knopp RK, Gallagher EJ. Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews: two randomized trials. JAMA 2002; 287 (21): 2781-2783.
10. Lee A, Dennis C, Campbell P. Nature's guide for mentors. Nature 2007; 447 (7146): 791-797.
11. Pernetta AP. Mentors could support a student reviewer database. Nature 2007; 448 (7150): 129.
12. Johnson KB, Miller RA. The JAMIA Student Editorial Board: peer review education in biomedical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004 ; 11 (1): 87-88.