The JAMIA Student Editorial Board: Peer Review Education in Biomedical Informatics

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 87-88

  Johnson, Kevin B ^a   Miller, Randolph A ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; EDUCATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; TRAINING; WORK;

EID: 0347052855     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1473     Document Type: Editorial

References (9)

1. Sylvia LM, Herbel JL. Manuscript peer review-a guide for health care professionals. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21:395-404.
2. Sweitzer BJ, Cullen DJ. How well does a journal's peer review process function? A survey of authors' opinions. JAMA. 1994;272:152-3.
3. Cummings P, Rivara FP. Reviewing manuscripts for Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(1):11-3.
4. Wessely S. What do we know about peer review? Psychol Med. 1996;26:883-6.
5. Callaham ML, Waeckerle JF. Medical journals and the science of peer review: raising the standard. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28:75-7.
6. McKenzie S. Reviewing scientific papers. Arch Dis Child. 1995;72:539-40.
7. Stead WW, Haynes RB, Fuller S, et al. Designing medical informatics research and library-resource projects to increase what is learned. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1:28-33.
8. Friedman CP. Where's the science in medical informatics? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1995;2:65-7.
9. Gadd CS, Valenta AL, Bailey DW. Manuscript peer review 101: a guide to the (critical) reader. Workshop at: AMIA Fall Symposium, 2002, Washington, DC.