Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: An ex vivo study

International Endodontic Journal

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 521-526

  Zmener, O ^a   Pameijer, C H ^b   Banegas, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHLOROFORM; DENTAL ALLOY; GUTTA PERCHA; NICKEL; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; SOLVENT; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETREATMENT; ROTATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PULP; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BICUSPID; CHLOROFORM; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GUTTA-PERCHA; HUMANS; NICKEL; RETREATMENT; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; ROOT CANAL OBTURATION; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; ROTATION; SOLVENTS; STAINLESS STEEL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33744989195     PISSN: 01432885     EISSN: 13652591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01100.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barrieshi-Nusair KM 2002 Gutta-percha retreatment: effectiveness of nickel-titanium rotary instruments versus stainless-steel hand files. Journal of Endodontics 28, 454 6.
2. Bergenholtz G Lekholm U Milthon R Heden G Odesjo B Ergstrom B 1979 Retreatment of endodontic fillings. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 87, 217 24.
3. Betti LV Bramante CM 2001 Quantec SC rotary instruments versus hand files for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. International Endodontic Journal 34, 514 9.
4. Bramante CM Betti LV 2000 Efficacy of Quantec rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal. International Endodontic Journal 33, 463 7.
5. Ferreira JJ Rhodes JS Pitt Ford TR 2001 The efficacy of gutta-percha removal using ProFiles. International Endodontic Journal 34, 267 74.
6. Friedman S Moshonov J Trope M 1992 Efficacy of removing glass ionomer cement, zinc oxide eugenol, and epoxy resin sealers from retreated root canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 73, 609 12.
7. Hulsmann M Bluhm V 2004 Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment. International Endodontic Journal 37, 468 76.
8. Imura N Kato AS Hata G-I Huemura M Toda T Weine F 2000 A comparison of the relative efficacies of four hand and rotary instrumentation techniques during endodontic retreatment. International Endodontic Journal 33, 361 6.
9. McDonald MN Vire DE 1992 Chloroform in endodontic operatory. Journal of Endodontics 18, 301 3.
10. Nearing MV Glickman GN 1999 Comparative efficacy of various rotary instrumentation systems for gutta-percha removal (Abstract). Journal of Endodontics 25, 225.
11. Nguyen NT 1991 Obturation of the root canal system. In: Cohen S Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the Pulp, 5th edn. St Louis, MO, USA: Mosby, pp. 199 201.
12. Peters OA Laib A Gohring TN Barbakow F 2001 Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. Journal of Endodontics 27, 1 6.
13. Sae-Lim V Rajamanickam I Lim BK Lee HL 2000 Effectiveness of ProFile.04 Taper rotary instruments in endodontic retreatment. Journal of Endodontics 26, 100 4.
14. Short JA Morgan LA Baumgartner JC 1997 A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques. Journal of Endodontics 23, 503 7.
15. Taintor JF Ross PN 1978 Opinions and practices of American Endodontic Diplomates. Dental Journal - Journal Dentaire 44, 321 25.
16. Tamse A Unger U Metzger Z Rosenberg M 1986 Gutta-percha solvents - a comparative study. Journal of Endodontics 12, 337 9.
17. Thompson SA Dummer PMH 1997 Shaping ability of ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. International Endodontic Journal 30, 1 7.
18. Vajrabhaya L Suwannawong SK Kamolroongwarakul R Pewklieng L 2004 Cytotoxicity evaluation of gutta-percha solvents: chloroform and GP-Solvent (limonene). Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 98, 756 9.
19. Weiger R ElAyouti A Lost C 2002 Efficiency of hand and rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals. Journal of Endodontics 28, 580 3.
20. Wennberg A Orstavik D 1989 Evaluation of alternatives to chloroform in endodontic practice. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 5, 234 7.
21. White M 2002 Endodontic system conserves canal anatomy with minimally invasive techniques. Dental Town Magazine 3, 26 30.
22. Wilcox L 1995 Endodontic retreatment with halotane versus chloroform solvent. Journal of Endodontics 21, 305 7.
23. Wilcox LR Krell KV Madison S Rittman B 1987 Endodontic retreatment: evaluation of gutta-percha and sealer removal and canal reinstrumentation. Journal of Endodontics 9, 453 7.
24. Wu M-K Wesselink PR 2001 A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. International Endodontic Journal 34, 137 41.
25. Zmener O Banegas G Pameijer CH 2005a Efficacy of an automated instrumentation technique in removing resin-based and zinc oxide and eugenol endodontic sealers when retreating root canals: An in vitro study. Endodontic Practice 8, 29 33.
26. Zmener O Pameijer CH Banegas G 2005b Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study. International Endodontic Journal 38, 356 63.
27. Zuolo ML Walton RE 1997 Instrument deterioration with usage: nickel-titanium versus stainless steel. Quintessence International 28, 397 402.