Ultrasound Effects after Post Space Preparation: An SEM Study

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 549-552

  Serafino, Cinzia ^b   Gallina, Giuseppe ^b   Cumbo, Enzo ^b   Monticelli, Francesca ^a   Goracci, Cecilia ^a   Ferrari, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Post space preparation; smear layer; ultrasonic irrigation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; ULTRASOUND THERAPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

DENTAL ETCHING; DENTIN; HUMANS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; SMEAR LAYER; TOOTH, NONVITAL; ULTRASONIC THERAPY;

EID: 33646709236     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Drummond J.L., Toepke R.S., and King T.J. Thermal and cycling loading of endodontic posts. Eur J Oral Sci 107 (1999) 220-224
2. Pashley D.H., Ciucchi B., and Sano H. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quint Int 24 (1993) 618-631
3. Chappel R.P., Cobb C.M., and Spencer P. Dentinal tubule anastomosis. a potential factor in adhesive bonding?. J Prost Dent 72 (1994) 183-188
4. Serafino C., Gallina G., Cumbo E., and Ferrari M. Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth. a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pat 97 (2004) 381-387
5. Koskinen K.P., Meurman J.H., and Stenval H. Appearance of chemically treated root canal walls in the scanning electron microscope. Scand J Dent Res 88 (1980) 397-405
6. Goldman M., Goldman L.B., Cavaleri R., Bogis J., and Lin P.S. The efficacy of several irrigating solutions for endodontics. a scanning electron microscopic study, part II. J Endod 8 (1982) 487-492
7. Yamada R.S., Armas A., Goldman M., and Lin P.S. A scanning electron microscopic comparison of a high volume final flush with several irrigating solutions. part III. J Endod 9 (1983) 137-242
8. Sen B.H., Wesselink P.R., and Türkün M. The smear layer. a phenomenon in root canal therapy. Int Endod J 28 (1995) 141-148
9. Martin H., Cunningham M.J., Morris J.P., and Cotton W.R. Ultrasonic versus hand filing of dentine. a quantitative study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pat 49 (1980) 79-81
10. Cheung G.S., and Stock C.J. In vitro cleaning ability of root canal irrigants with and without endoonics. Int Endod J 26 (1993) 334-343
11. Cameron J.A. The choice of irrigant during hand instrumentation and ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal. a scanning electron microscope study. Aust Dent J 40 (1995) 85-90
12. Cameron J.A. Factors affecting the clinical efficiency of ultrasonic endodontics. a scanning electron microscopy study. Int Endod J 28 (1995) 47-53
13. Rovatti L., and Dallari A. I Perni Endocanalari II Edizione. Edizioni Martina srl. Bologna (1996) 65-72
14. Schneider S.W. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 32 (1971) 271-278
15. Barbakow F., Peters O., and Havranek L. Effects of Nd:YAG lasers on root canal walls. a light and scanning electron microscopic study. Quint Int 30 (1999) 837-845
16. Ferrari M., Vichi A., and Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls. an SEM investigation. Dent Mater J 17 (2001) 422-429
17. Ferrari M., Vichi A., Grandini S., and Goracci C. Efficacy of a self-curing adhesive-resin cement system on luting glass-fibre posts into root canals. an SEM investigation. Int J Prost 14 (2001) 543-549
18. Vichi A., Grandini S., and Ferrari M. Comparison between two clinical procedures for bonding fiber posts into a root canal. a microscopic investigation. J Endod 28 (2002) 355-360
19. Vichi A., Grandini S., Davidson C.L., and Ferrari M. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mater J 18 (2002) 495-502
20. Eldeniz A.V., Erdemir A., and Belli S. Shear bond strength of three resin based sealers to dentin with and without the smear layer. J Endod 31 (2005) 293-296
21. Vargas J.W., Liewehr F.R., Joyce A.P., and Runner R.R. A comparison of the in vitro retentive strength of glass-ionomer cement, zinc-phosphate cement, and mineral trioxide aggregate for the retention of the prefabricated posts in bovine incisors. J Endod 30 (2004) 775-777
22. Nakabayashi N., Watanabe A., and Igarashi K. AFM observation of collapse and expansion of phosphoric acid-demineralized dentin. J Biomed Mater Res A 68 (2004) 558-565
23. Guerisoli D.M.Z., Marchesan M.A., Walmsley A.D., Lumley P.J., and Pecora J.D. Evaluation of smear layer removal by EDTAC and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic agitation. Int Endod J 35 (2002) 5 418-27
24. Gutars R., Nusstein J., Reader A., and Beck M. In vivo debridment efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod 31 (2005) 166-170
25. Nakashima K., and Terata R. Effect of ph modified EDTA solution to the properties of dentin. J Endod 31 (2005) 47-49
26. Ciucchi B., Khettabi M., and Holz J. The effectiveness of different endodontic irrigation procedures on the removal of the smear layer. a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J 22 (1989) 21-28
27. Abbott P., Heijkoop P., Cardaci S., Hume W., and Heithersay G. An SEM study of the effects of different irrigation sequences and ultrasonics. Int Endod J 24 (1991) 308-316
28. Hulsman M., Heckendorff M., and Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment. mode and indications for their use. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 810-819