Activation-verification in continuous speech processing: Interaction of cognitive strategies as a possible theoretical approach

Journal of Neurolinguistics

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-17

  Strelnikov, Kuzma ^a  

^a Brain and Cognition Research Center in Toulouse   (France)

Author keywords

Cognitive strategy; Continuous speech; Functional asymmetry; Neurolinguistics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; NEUROIMAGING; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; THEORETICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL STUDY; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; VERBAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 37349025469     PISSN: 09116044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Altmann G., and Steedman M. Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition 30 3 (1988) 191-238
2. Bard E.G., Shillcock R.C., and Altmann G.T. The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: Effects of subsequent context. Perception and Psychophysics 44 5 (1988) 395-408
3. Blumstein S., Goodglass H., and Tartter V. The reliability of ear advantage in dichotic listening. Brain and Language 2 2 (1975) 226-236
4. Boland J.E., Tanenhaus M.K., Carlson G., and Garnsey S.M. Lexical projection and the interaction of syntax and semantics in parsing. Journal of Psycholinguist Research 18 6 (1989) 563-576
5. Bottini G., Corcoran R., Sterzi R., Paulesu E., Schenone P., Scarpa P., et al. The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain 117 Pt. 6 (1994) 1241-1253
6. Brownell H.H., Simpson T.L., Bihrle A.M., Potter H.H., and Gardner H. Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia 28 4 (1990) 375-383
7. Buchanan T.W., Lutz K., Mirzazade S., Specht K., Shah N.J., Zilles K., et al. Recognition of emotional prosody and verbal components of spoken language: An fMRI study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 9 3 (2000) 227-238
8. Chafe W. Punctuation and the prosody of written language. Written Communication 5 (1988) 396-426
9. Chernigovskaya T.V., and Deglin V.L. Brain functional asymmetry and neural organization of linguistic competence. Brain and Language 29 1 (1986) 141-153
10. Coltheart M., Curtis B., Atkins P., and Haller H. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review 100 (1993) 589-608
11. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., and Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 108 1 (2001) 204-256
12. Deacon D., Grose-Fifer J., Yang C.M., Stanick V., Hewitt S., and Dynowska A. Evidence for a new conceptualization of semantic representation in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Cortex 40 3 (2004) 467-478
13. Demonet J.F., Thierry G., and Cardebat D. Renewal of the neurophysiology of language: Functional neuroimaging. Physiological Review 85 1 (2005) 49-95
14. Embick D., Marantz A., Miyashita Y., O'Neil W., and Sakai K.L. A syntactic specialization for Broca's area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America 97 11 (2000) 6150-6154
15. Frazier L., Carlson K., and Clifton Jr. C. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 6 (2006) 244-249
16. Friederici A.D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 2 (2002) 78-84
17. Friederici A.D., and Alter K. Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway model. Brain and Language 89 2 (2004) 267-276
18. Friederici A.D., Meyer M., and von Cramon D.Y. Auditory language comprehension: An event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain and Language 74 2 (2000) 289-300
19. Friederici A.D., Ruschemeyer S.A., Hahne A., and Fiebach C.J. The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cerebral Cortex 13 2 (2003) 170-177
20. Frost R. Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin 123 1 (1998) 71-99
21. Gazzaniga M.S. Right hemisphere language following brain bisection. A 20-year perspective. American Psychologist 38 5 (1983) 525-537
22. Gazzaniga M.S. Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: Does the corpus callosum enable the human condition?. Brain 123 Pt. 7 (2000) 1293-1326
23. Gazzaniga M.S., and Sperry R.W. Language after section of the cerebral commissures. Brain 90 1 (1967) 131-148
24. Goldinger S.D., and Azuma T. Puzzle-solving science: The quixotic quest for units in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics 13 3-4 (2003) 305-320
25. Grossberg S. The complementary brain: Unifying brain dynamics and modularity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 6 (2000) 233-246
26. Hawkins S. Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics 31 (2003) 373-405
27. Hebb D.O. The organization of behavior. A neuropsychological theory (1949), Wiley, New York
28. Hickok G., and Poeppel D. Dorsal and ventral streams: A framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92 1-2 (2004) 67-99
29. Hutchinson A., Whitman R.D., Abeare C., and Raiter J. The unification of mind: Integration of hemispheric semantic processing. Brain and Language 87 3 (2003) 361-368
30. Hutsler J., and Galuske R.A. Hemispheric asymmetries in cerebral cortical networks. Trends in Neurosciences 26 8 (2003) 429-435
31. Jung-Beeman M. Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 11 (2005) 512-518
32. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A., Keller T.A., Eddy W.F., and Thulborn K.R. Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science 274 5284 (1996) 114-116
33. Kang A.M., Constable R.T., Gore J.C., and Avrutin S. An event-related fMRI study of implicit phrase-level syntactic and semantic processing. Neuroimage 10 5 (1999) 555-561
34. Kaplan J.A., Brownell H.H., Jacobs J.R., and Gardner H. The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks. Brain and Language 38 2 (1990) 315-333
35. Kiefer M., Weisbrod M., Kern I., Maier S., and Spitzer M. Right hemisphere activation during indirect semantic priming: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language 64 3 (1998) 377-408
36. Kiehl K.A., Laurens K.R., and Liddle P.F. Reading anomalous sentences: An event-related fMRI study of semantic processing. Neuroimage 17 2 (2002) 842-850
37. Klein D., Zatorre R.J., Milner B., and Zhao V. A cross-linguistic PET study of tone perception in Mandarin Chinese and English speakers. Neuroimage 13 4 (2001) 646-653
38. Luce P.A. A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics 39 3 (1986) 155-158
39. MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N.J., and Seidenberg M.S. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected]. Psychological Review 101 4 (1994) 676-703
40. Marslen-Wilson W., and Tyler L.K. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 8 1 (1980) 1-71
41. Mazoyer B.M., Tzourio N., Frak V., Syrota A., Murayama N., and Levrier O. The cortical representation of speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5 4 (1993) 467-479
42. McQueen J.M., Dahan D., and Cutler A. Continuity and gradedness in speech processing. In: Meyer A.S., and Schiller N.O. (Eds). Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production (2003), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 39-78
43. Meyer M., Alter K., Friederici A.D., Lohmann G., and von Cramon D.Y. FMRI reveals brain regions mediating slow prosodic modulations in spoken sentences. Human Brain Mapping 17 2 (2002) 73-88
44. Meyer M., Friederici A.D., and von Cramon D.Y. Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: Event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 9 1 (2000) 19-33
45. Mitchell D.C. Sentence parsing. In: Gernbacher M.A. (Ed). Handbook of psycholinguistics (1994), Academic Press, New York 375-409
46. Mohr C., Michel C.M., Lantz G., Ortigue S., Viaud-Delmon I., and Landis T. Brain state-dependent functional hemispheric specialization in men but not in women. Cerebral Cortex 15 9 (2005) 1451-1458
47. Moro A., Tettamanti M., Perani D., Donati C., Cappa S.F., and Fazio F. Syntax and the brain: Disentangling grammar by selective anomalies. Neuroimage 13 1 (2001) 110-118
48. Naatanen R., Lehtokoski A., Lennes M., Cheour M., Huotilainen M., Iivonen A., et al. Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature 385 6615 (1997) 432-434
49. Norris D., McQueen J.M., and Cutler A. Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Member Cognition 21 5 (1995) 1209-1228
50. Norris D., McQueen J.M., and Cutler A. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Science 23 3 (2000) 299-325 [discussion 325-270]
51. Norris D., McQueen J.M., and Cutler A. Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology 47 2 (2003) 204-238
52. Paap K.R., Newsome S.L., McDonald J.E., and Schvaneveldt R.W. An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect. Psychological Review 89 5 (1982) 573-594
53. Pitt M.A., and Samuel A.G. Lexical and sublexical feedback in auditory word recognition. Cognitive Psychology 29 2 (1995) 149-188
54. Plante E., Creusere M., and Sabin C. Dissociating sentential prosody from sentence processing: Activation interacts with task demands. Neuroimage 17 1 (2002) 401-410
55. Plaut D.C. Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision. Language and cognitive processes 12 5/6 (1997) 765-805
56. Poeppel D. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: Cerebral lateralization as asymmetric sampling in time'. Speech Communication 41 1 (2003) 245-255
57. Pulvermuller F. A brain perspective on language mechanisms: From discrete neuronal ensembles to serial order. Progress in Neurobiology 67 2 (2002) 85-111
58. Pulvermüller F. The neuroscience of language. on brain circuits of words and serial order (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
59. Pulvermuller F., Kujala T., Shtyrov Y., Simola J., Tiitinen H., Alku P., et al. Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroimage 14 3 (2001) 607-616
60. Roland D., Elman J.L., and Ferreira V.S. Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences. Cognition 98 3 (2006) 245-272
61. Sadoski M., and Paivio A. A dual coding theoretical model of reading. In: Ruddell R.B., and Unrau N.J. (Eds). Theoretical models and processes of reading (2004), International Reading Association, Inc, Newark, DE 1329-1362
62. Schirmer A., Zysset S., Kotz S.A., and Yves von Cramon D. Gender differences in the activation of inferior frontal cortex during emotional speech perception. Neuroimage 21 3 (2004) 1114-1123
63. Scott S.K., and Wise R.J. The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception. Cognition 92 1-2 (2004) 13-45
64. Shafer V.L., Schwartz R.G., and Kurtzberg D. Language-specific memory traces of consonants in the brain. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 18 3 (2004) 242-254
65. Springer S.P., and Deutsch G. Left brain, right brain (1993), W.H. Freeman, New York
66. St George M., Kutas M., Martinez A., and Sereno M.I. Semantic integration in reading: Engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. Brain 122 Pt. 7 (1999) 1317-1325
67. Steinhauer K. Electrophysiological correlates of prosody and punctuation. Brain and Language 86 1 (2003) 142-164
68. Steinhauer K., Alter K., and Friederici A.D. Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience 2 2 (1999) 191-196
69. Strelnikov, K. (2007). Can mismatch negativity be linked to synaptic processes? A glutamatergic approach to deviance detection. Brain Cognition, in press, doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2007.04.002.
70. Strelnikov K.N., Vorobyev V.A., Chernigovskaya T.V., and Medvedev S.V. Prosodic clues to syntactic processing-A PET and ERP study. Neuroimage 29 4 (2006) 1127-1134
71. Teng E.L. Dichotic ear difference is a poor index for the functional asymmetry between the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia 19 2 (1981) 235-240
72. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., and Kello C. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition 19 3 (1993) 528-553
73. Ullman M.T. Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition 92 1-2 (2004) 231-270
74. van den Brink D., and Hagoort P. The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16 6 (2004) 1068-1084
75. Vigneau M., Beaucousin V., Herve P.Y., Duffau H., Crivello F., Houde O., et al. Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage 30 4 (2006) 1414-1432
76. Westlake P.R. The possibilities of neural holographic processes within the brain. Kybernetik 7 4 (1970) 129-153
77. Weylman S.T., Brownell H.H., Roman M., and Gardner H. Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording. Brain and Language 36 4 (1989) 580-591
78. Zaidel E., and Peters A.M. Phonological encoding and ideographic reading by the disconnected right hemisphere: Two case studies. Brain and Language 14 2 (1981) 205-234
79. Zatorre R.J., Evans A.C., Meyer E., and Gjedde A. Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. Science 256 5058 (1992) 846-849