Machine reading as a cognitive science research instrument

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-07-06, Issue , 2007, Pages 55-60

  Forbus, Kenneth D ^a   Lockwood, Kate ^a   Tomai, Emmett ^a   Dehghani, Morteza ^a   Czyz, Jakub ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

MACHINE READING; MORAL DILEMMAS; MULTIMODAL MATERIALS; SCIENCE RESEARCH;

FORMAL LANGUAGES;

EID: 37349012878     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 60-71.
2. Baron, J. & Spranca, M. 1997.Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1-16.
3. Buckley, S. 1979. Sun up to sun down. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Bowerman, M.. (1996). Learning How to Structure Space for Language: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. In P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M.F. Garrett (eds.) Language and Space (493-530). Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press
5. Carlson-Radvansky, L.A., Covey, E.S., & Lattanzi, K.M. (1999). "What" effects on "Where": Functional influences on spatial relations. Psychological Science, 10(6): 516-521.
6. Clark, P., Harrison, P. and Thompson, J. 2003. A Knowledge-Driven Approach to Text Meaning Processing. Proceedings of the HLT Workshop on Text Meaning Processing, pp 1-6.
7. Collins, A., & Gentner, D. (1987). How people construct mental models. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 243-265). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Coventry, K.R., & Garrod, S.C. (2004). Saying, Seeing, and Acting: The Psychological Semantics of Spatial Prepositions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
10. Forbus, K. 1984. Qualitative process theory. Artificial Intelligence, 24, 1984.
11. Forbus, K., Gentner, D. & Law, K. 1995. MAC/FAC: A model of Similarity-based Retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19(2), April-June, pp 141-205.
12. Forbus, K. and Hinrichs, T. 2006. Companion Cognitive Systems: A Step toward Human-Level AI. AI Magazine, 27(2): Summer 2006: 83-95.
13. Forbus, K., Riesbeck, C., Bimbaum, L., Livingston, K., Sharma, A., Ureel, L. 2007. A Prototype System that Learns by Reading Simplified Texts. AAAI Spring Symposium on Machine Reading.
14. Forbus, K. and Usher, J. (2002). Sketching for knowledge capture: A progress report. IUI'02, January 13-16, 2002, San Francisco, California.
15. Gratch, J., Marsella, S., and Mao W. 2006. Towards a Validated Model of "Emotional Intelligence." Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI06).
16. Gentner, D. 1983. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 1, 155-170.
17. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., and Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393-408.
18. Halstead, D. and Forbus, K. (2005). Transforming between Propositions and Features: Bridging the Gap. Proceedings of AAAI-2005. Pittsburgh, PA.
19. Hegarty, M., and Just, M. 1993. Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language 32, 717-742.
20. nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
21. Kuehne, S.E., and Forbus, K. D. (2002). Qualitative physics as a component in natural language semantics: A progress report. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
22. Kuehne, S. E. (2004). On the Representation of Physical Quantities in Natural Language Text. Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, Illinois, USA, August.
23. th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Stressa, Italy.
24. th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Vancouver, Canada.
25. Medin, D.L & Atran, S. (2004). The Native Mind: Biological Categorization, Reasoning and Decision Making in Development Across Cultures. Psychological Review, 111(4), 960-983.
26. Novak, G. and Bulko, W. 1990. Understanding natural language with diagrams. Proceedings of AAAI-90
27. Nyberg, E., Mitamura, T., Baker, K., Svoboda, D., Peterson, B., and Williams, J. 2002. Deriving Semantic Knowledge from Descriptive Texts using an MT System. Proceedings of AMTA 2002.
28. nd International Workshop on Controlled Language Applications (CLAW'98)
29. Tanner, C. and Medin, D.L. 2004. Protected Values: No omission bias and no framing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(1), 185-191.
30. Tanner, C., Medin D. L., Iliev R. (Forthcoming) "Influence of Deontological vs. Consequentialist Orientations on Act Choices and Framing Effects: When Principles are more Important than Consequences".
31. Tetlock, P.E., Kristel, O.V., Elson, S.B., Green, M., & Lerner, J.S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable. Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 5, 853-870.