Transforming between propositions and features: Bridging the gap

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 2005, Pages 777-782

  Halstead, Daniel T ^a   Forbus, Kenneth D ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS;

BAYESIAN NETWORK MODELING; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; REASONING; STRUCTURAL REPRESENTATIONS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 29344459020     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Anderson, B., & Moore, A. (1998). ADTrees for Fast Counting and for Fast Learning of Association Rules. Knowledge Discovery from Databases, New York, 1998.
2. Blockeel, H., & Uwents, W. (2004). Using neural networks for relational learning. ICML-2004 Workshop on Statistical Relational Learning and its Connection to Other Fields, pp.23-28.
3. Cohn, D., & Hofmann, T. (2001). The missing link - a probabilistic model of document content and hypertext connectivity. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13:430-436, MIT Press.
4. Dayanik, A. and Nevill-Manning, C. G. (2004). Clustering in Relational Biological Data. ICML-2004 Workshop on Statistical Relational Learning and Connections to Other Fields, pp. 42-47
5. Eliasmith, C. and Thagard, P. 2001. Integrating structure and meaning: A distributed model of connectionist mapping. Cognitive Science.
6. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. and Centner, D. The Structure-Mapping Engine. Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1986.
7. Forbus, K. (1984). Qualitative process theory. Artificial Intelligence, 24, 85-168
8. Forbus, K. Exploring analogy in the large. In Gentner, D., Holyoak, K., and Kokinov, B. (Eds.) Analogy: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. MIT Press. 2001.
9. Gentner, D., Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy, Cognitive Science 7(2), 1983
10. Gentner, D. (2003). Why we're so smart. In D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 195-235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Getoor, L., Friedman, N., Koller, D., & Taskar, B. (2002). Learning probabilistic models of link structure. JMLR 3, 679-707.
12. Getoor, L., Friedman, N., Koller, D., & Pfeffer, A. Learning probabilistic relational models. In Dzeoski, S. and Lavrac, N. (Eds.), Relational Data Mining (pp. 307-335). Kluwer, 2001.
13. Hummel, I.E., & Holyoak, K.J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104.
14. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.
15. th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, 33-40.
16. Kersting, K., de Raedt, L., & Kramer, S. (2000). Interpreting Bayesian logic programs. Proc. AAAI-2000 Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data, pp. 29-35.
17. Kuehne, S. E., Gentner, D. & Forbus, K. D. (2000). Modeling infant learning via symbolic structural alignment. Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 286-291.
18. Leake, D. (Ed.) 1996. Case-based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons and Future Directions, MIT Press.
19. Mitchell, M. (1993) Analogy-making as perception: A computer model. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Mostek, T., Forbus, K. and Meverden, C. 2000. Dynamic case creation and expansion for analogical reasoning. Proceedings of AAAI-2000. Austin, Texas.
21. Tenenbaum, J., & Griffiths, T. (2001). Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (629-640).