Protein homology detection and fold inference through multiple alignment entropy profiles

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 248-256

  Sánchez Flores, Alejandro ^a   Pérez Rueda, Ernesto ^a   Segovia, Lorenzo ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b INSTITUTO DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Entropy profiles; Fold recognition; Homology detection

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CALCULATION; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ENTROPY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACIDS; ENTROPY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 37349012140     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21506     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Söding J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 2005;21:951-960.
2. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
3. Chung SY, Subbiah S. A structural explanation for the twilight zone of protein sequence homology. Structure 1996;4:1123-1127.
4. Ohlson T, Wallner B, Elofsson A. Profile-profile methods provide improved fold-recognition: a study of different profile-profile alignment methods. Proteins 2004;57:188-197.
5. Mirny L, Shakhnovich E. Universally conserved positions in protein folds: reading evolutionary signals about stability, folding kinetics and function. J Mol Biol 1999;291:177-196.
6. Mirny L, Abkevich VI, Shakhnovich E. How evolution makes proteins fold quickly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;28:4976-4981.
7. Atchley WR, Zhao J, Fernandes AD, Drüke T. Solving the protein sequence metric problem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:6395-6400.
8. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. CATH: a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 1997;5:1093-1108.
9. Pearl FMG, Lee D, Bray JE, Sillitoe I, Todd AE, Harrison AP, Thornton JM, Orengo CA. Assigning genomic sequences to CATH. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:277-282.
10. Li W, Jaroszewski L, Godzik A. Clustering of highly homologous sequences to reduce the size of large protein database. Bioinformatics 2001;17:282-283.
11. Apweiler R, Bairoch A, Wu CH, Barker WC, Boeckmann B, Ferro S, Gasteiger E, Huang H, Lopez R, Magrane N, Martin MJ, Natale DA, O'Donovan C, Redaschi N, Yeh LS. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:D115-D119.
12. Brown NP, Leroy C, Sander C. Mview: a web compatible database search or multiple alignment viewer. Bioinformatics 1998;14:380-381.
13. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech J 1948;27:379-423.
14. Wooton JC, Federhen S. Statistics of local complexity in amino acid sequences and sequences databases. Comput Chem 1993;17:149-163.
15. Pearson WR. Flexible similarity searching with the FASTA3 program package. Methods Mol Biol 2000;132:185-219.
16. Sadreyev R, Grishin N. COMPASS: a tool for comparison of multiple protein alignment with assessment of statistical significance. J Mol Biol 2003;326:317-336.
17. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202.
18. Brenner SE, Chothia C, Hubbard TJ. Assessing sequence comparison methods with reliable structurally identified distant evolutionary relationships. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:6073-6078.
19. Choi S, Esaki N, Makoto A, Yoshimura T, Soda K. Bacterial glutamate racemase has a high sequence similarity with myoglobins and forms an equimolar inactive complex with hemin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:10144-10147.
20. Liu L, Iwata K, Kita A, Kawarabayasi Y, Yohda M, Miki K. Crystal structure of aspartate racemase from Pyrococcus horikoshii OT3 and its implications for molecular mechanism of PLP-independent racemization. J Mol Biol 2002;319:479-489.
21. Sierk ML, Pearson WR. Sensitivity and selectivity in protein structure comparison. Protein Sci 2004;13:773-785.
22. Hwang KY, Cho C, Kim SS, Sung H, Yu YG, Cho Y. Structure and mechanism of glutamate racemase from Aquifex pyrophilus. Nat Struct Biol 1999;6:422-426.
23. Liu L, Iwata K, Masafumi Y, Miki K. Structural insight into gene duplication, gene fusion and domain swapping in the evolution of PLP-independent amino acid racemases. FEBS Lett 2002;528:114-118.