Netville online and offline observing and surveying a wired suburb

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn , Issue 3, 1999, Pages 475-492

  Hampton, Keith N ^a   Wellman, Barry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033236352     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00027649921955290     Document Type: Short Survey

References (40)

1. Campbell, K., & Lee, B.(1991). Name generators in surveys of personal networks. Social Networks, 13, 203-221.
2. Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation. (1997). Ontario housing and market report: Fourth quarter 1997. Ottawa, Canada: Author.
3. Cohill, A. M., & Kavanaugh, A. L. (Eds.). (1997). Community networks: Lessons from Blacksburg, Virginia. Boston: Artech House.
4. Durkheim, E. (1964). The Division of labor in society. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
5. Ekos Research Associates. (1998). Information highway and the Canadian communications household: Overview of findings. Ottawa: Ekos Research Associates.
6. Erickson, B., & Nosanchuk, T. A. (1983). Applied network sampling. Social Networks, 5, 367-382.
7. Fischer, C. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Fox, R. (1995). Newstrack. Communications of the ACM, 38(6), 11-12.
9. Gans, H. (1967). The Levittowners. New York: Vintage Books.
10. Gans, H. (1982). The urban villagers: Group and class in the life of Italian-Americans. New York: Free Press.
11. Hampton, K. (1998, August). The wired suburb: Glocalization on and off-line. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociology Association, San Francisco, CA.
12. Hampton, K. (1999, April). Computer assisted interviewing: The design and application of survey software to the wired suburb project. Bulletin de Methode Sociologique, 62, 49-68.
13. Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (in press). Collective action on-line in a wired suburb. Mobilization. Jones, M. (in press). Wired communities. Evanston, IL: Center for Strategic Technology Research, Andersen Consulting.
14. Kavanaugh, A., & Cohill, A. (1998). Use and impact of community networking in the Blacksburg electronic village: Selected research summary. Blacksburg: Virginia Tech University, Department of Communication.
15. Kavanaugh, A., & Patterson, S. (1998). The impact of computer networking on social capital: A test case. New York: National Communications Association.
16. Kraut, R., Lunmark, V., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
17. Liebow, E. (1967). Tally's corner. Boston: Little, Brown.
18. Müller, C., Wellman, B., & Marin, A. (in press). How to use SPSS to study ego-centric networks. Bulletin de Methode Sociologique.
19. Park, R. (1967). The urban community as a spatial pattern and a moral order. In R. H. Turner (Ed.), Robert E Park on social control and collective behavior (pp. 55-68). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1925).
20. Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
21. Richman, W., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., & Drasgow, F. (in press). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology.
22. Slouka, M. (1995). War of the worlds: Cyberspace and the high-tech assault on reality. New York: Basic Books.
23. Smith, M., & Kollock, P. (Eds.). (1999). Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge.
24. Tilly, C. (1974). Introduction. In C. Tilly (Ed.), An urban world (pp. 1-35). Boston: Little, Brown.
25. Tönnies, F. (1955). Community and organization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1887)
26. Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 460-487.
27. Wellman, B. (1972). Who needs neighbourhoods? In A. Powell (Ed.), The city: Attacking modern myths (pp. 94-113). Toronto, Canada: McClelland & Stewart.
28. Wellman, B. (1982). Studying personal communities. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 61-80). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29. Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 19-61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Wellman, B. (1992). How to use SAS to study egocentric networks. Cultural Anthropology Methods Bulletin, 4, 6-12.
31. Wellman, B. (1996). Are personal communities local? A dumptarian reconsideration. Social Networks, 18, 347-354.
32. Wellman, B. (1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 179-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Wellman, B. (Ed.). (1999). Networks in the global village. Boulder, CO: Westview.
34. Wellman, B. (1999). The local nature of the Internet. Connections.
35. Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Net-surfers don't ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. In B. Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the global village (pp. 331-366). Boulder, CO: Westview.
36. Wellman, B., & Leighton, B. (1979). Networks, neighborhoods and communities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14, 363-390.
37. Wellman, B., & Tindall, D. (1993). Reach out and touch some bodies: How social networks connect telephone networks. Progress in Communication Sciences, 12, 63-93.
38. Whyte, W. (1981). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum (3rd ed.). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
39. Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 3-24.
40. Yankee Group. (1998). Yankee Group finds consumer demand for high-speed internet services growing, but availability is limited: Subscribers to high speed Internet services to grow to 7 million by 2002, the Yankee Group predicts. Boston: Primark Corporation.