Contact stress at the post-cam mechanism in posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 483-488

  Nakayama, K ^a   Matsuda, S ^a   Miura, H ^a   Higaki, H ^b   Otsuka, K ^b   Iwamoto, Y ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU SANGYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; JOINT FUNCTION; JOINT STABILITY; KIRSCHNER WIRE; MEASUREMENT; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 17744385981     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15684     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Insall JN, Hood RW, Flawn LB, Sullivan DJ. The total condylar knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis: a five to nine-year follow-up of the first one hundred consecutive replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1983;65-A:619-28.
2. Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77-A:1713-20.
3. Schai PA, Thornhill TS, Scott RD. Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system: results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:850-8.
4. Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS. Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study. Clin Orthop 2001;388:10-17.
5. Mikulak SA, Mahoney OM, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. Loosening and osteolysis with the press-fit condylar posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83-A398-403.
6. Mauerham DR. Fracture of the polyethylene tibial post in a posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty mimicking patellar clunk syndrome: a report of 5 cases. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:942-5.
7. Puloski SK, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Tibial post wear in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: an unrecognized source of polyethylene debris. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83-A:390-7.
8. Mestha P, Shenava Y, D'Arcy JC. Fracture of the polyethylene tibial post in posterior stabilized (Insall Burstein II) total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000;15: 814-15.
9. Callaghan JJ, O'Rourke MR, Goetz DD, et al. Tibial post impingement in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2002;404:83-8.
10. Sultan PG, Most E, Schule S, Li G, Rubash HE. Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: advances in prosthetic design. Clin Orthop 2003;416:167-73.
11. Matsuda S, Whiteside LA, White SE, McCarthy DS. Knee kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament sacrificed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1997;341:257-66.
12. Dahlkvist NJ, Mayo P, Seedhom BB. Forces during squatting and rising from a deep squat. Eng Med 1982;11:69-76.
13. Nagura T, Dyrby CO, Alexander EJ, Andriacchi TP. Mechanical loads at the knee joint during deep flexion. J Orthop Res 2002;20:881-6.
14. Wilk KE, Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, et al. A comparison of tibiofemoral joint forces and electromyographic activity during open and closed kinetic chain exercises. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24:518-27.
15. Li G, Zayontz S, Most E, et al. In situ forces of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments in high knee flexion, and in vitro investigation. J Orthop Res 2004;22:293-7.
16. Li G, Zayontz S, DeFrate LE, et al. Kinematics of the knee at high flexion angles: an in vitro investigation. J Orthop Res 2004;22:90-5.
17. Li G, Most E, Otterberg E, et al. Biomechanics of posterior-substituting total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro study. Clin Orthop 2002;404:214-25.
18. Matsuda S, White SE, Williams VG 2nd, McCarthy DS, Whiteside LA. Contact stress analysis in meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998;13: 699-706.
19. Matsuda S, Ishinishin T, White SE, Whiteside LA. Patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty: effect on contact area and contact stress. J Arthroplasty 1997;12: 790-7.
20. Matsuda S, Whiteside LA, White SE. The effect of varus tilt on contact stresses in total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. Orthopaedics 1999;22:303-7.
21. Lee TQ, Gerken AP, Glaser FE, Kim WC, Anzel SH. Patellofemoral joint kinematics and contact pressures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1997;340:257-66.
22. Stukenborg-Colsman C, Ostermeier S, Hurschler C, Wirth CJ. Tibiofemoral contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay designs. Acta Orthop Scand 2002;73:638-46.
23. Most E, Li G, Schule S, et al. The kinematics of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2003;416:197-207.
24. Goodfellow JW, O'Connor J. Clinical results of the Oxford knee: surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop 1986; 205:21-42.
25. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. The New Jersey low-contact-stress knee replacement system: biomechanical rationale and review of the first 123 cemented cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1986;105:197-204.
26. Matsuda S, Whiteside LA, White SE, McCarthy DS. Knee stability in meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:82-90.
27. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Walker SA, Cheal EJ, Stiehl JB. Femoral condylar lift-off in vivo in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:33-9.