Mechanical Bond Strength of the Cement-Tibial Component Interface in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 883-888

  Pittman, Gavin T ^a,b   Peters, Christopher L ^a,b   Hines, Jerod L ^b   Bachus, Kent N ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of Utah   (United States)

Author keywords

cement tibial component interface; mechanical bond strength; total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BONE CEMENT; CHROMIUM; COBALT; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; ROTATION; STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH; TENSION; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE CEMENTS; CEMENTATION; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIBIA; TITANIUM;

EID: 33747874668     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Keating E.M., Meding J.B., Faris P.M., et al. Long-term follow-up of nonmodular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop 404 (2002) 34
2. Buechel Sr. F.F., Buechel Jr. F.F., Pappas M.J., et al. Twenty-year evaluation of the New Jersey LCS rotating platform knee replacement. J Knee Surg 15 (2002) 84
3. Robertsson O., Knutson K., Lewold S., et al. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997, An update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997. Acta Orthop Scand 72 (2001) 503
4. Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N., Windsor R.E., et al. Survivorship of cemented knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71 (1989) 798
5. McAuley J.P., and Engh G.A. Constraint in total knee arthroplasty: when and what?. J Arthroplasty 18 (2003) 51
6. Lachiewicz P.F., and Soileau E.S. The rates of osteolysis and loosening associated with a modular posterior stabilized knee replacement. Results at five to fourteen years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (2004) 525
7. Ritter M.A., Herbst S.A., Keating E.M., et al. Radiolucency at the bone cement interface in total knee replacement. The effects of bone-surface preparation and cement technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76 (1994) 60
8. Adalberth G., Nilsson K.G., Karrholm J., et al. Fixation of the tibial component using CMW-1 or Palacos bone cement with gentamicin: similar outcome in a randomized radiostereometric study of 51 total knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 73 (2002) 531
9. Mikulak S.A., Mahoney O.M., dela Rosa M.A., et al. Loosening and osteolysis with the press-fit condylar posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A (2001) 398
10. Crowninshield R.D., Jennings J.D., Laurent M.L., et al. Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics. Clin Orthop (1998) 90
11. Peters C.L., Craig M.A., Mohr R.A., et al. Tibial component fixation with cement: full- versus surface-cementation techniques. Clin Orthop (2003) 158
12. Verdonschot N., and Huiskes R. Surface roughness of debonded straight-tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage. Biomaterials 19 (1998) 1773
13. Verdonschot N., and Huiskes R. Mechanical effects of stem cement interface characteristics in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop (1996) 326
14. Saha S., and Pal S. Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review. J Biomed Mater Res 18 (1984) 435
15. Davies J.P., and Harris W.H. Tensile bonding strength of the cement-prosthesis interface. Orthopedics 17 (1994) 171
16. Raab S., Ahmed A.M., and Provan J.W. The quasistatic and fatigue performance the implant/bone-cement interface. J Biomed Mater Res 15 (1981) 159
17. Bundy K.J., and Penn R.W. The effect of surface preparation on metal/bone cement interfacial strength. J Biomed Mater Res 21 (1987) 773
18. Erli H.J., Marx R., Paar O., et al. Surface pretreatments for medical application of adhesion. Biomed Eng Online 2 (2003) 15