A study of Internet addiction through the lens of the interpersonal theory

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 799-804

  Liu, Chia Yi ^a   Kuo, Feng Yang ^b  

^a WENZAO URSULINE UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD PARENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET ADDICTION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER GROUP; PREDICTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL PHOBIA;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ANXIETY; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 37249043877     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9951     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kraut R, et al. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being. Journal of American Psychologist 1998; 53:1017-31.
2. La Greca AM, Harrison HM. Adolescent peer relations, friendships, and romantic relationships: do they predict social anxiety and depression? Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 2005; 34:49-61.
3. Lo SK, Wang CC, Fang WC. Physical interpersonal relationships and social anxiety among online game players. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2005; 8:15-20.
4. Turner S, Beidel D, Broden J, Stanley M, Jacob R. Social phobia: axis I and II correlates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1991; 100:102-6.
5. Young KS. (1998) Caught in the Net: how to recognize the signs of Internet addiction - and winning strategy for recovery. New York: Wiley.
6. Stephen AM, Black MJ. (1995) Freud and beyond: a history of modern psychoanalytic thought. New York: Basic Books.
7. Burger JM. (1997) Personality. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
8. Bell LG, Cornwell CS, Bell DC. Peer relationships of adolescent daughters: a reflection of relationship patterns. Family Relations 1988; 37:171-4.
9. Feldman SS, Wentzel KR. The relationship between parenting styles, son's self restraint and peer relations in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence 1990; 10:439-54.
10. Anderson CA, Harvey RJ. Discrimination between problems in living: an examination of measures of depression, loneliness, shyness, and social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 1988; 6:482-91.
11. Vernberg EM, Abwender DA, Ewell KK, Beery SH. Social anxiety and peer relationships in early adolescence: a prospective analysis. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1992; 21:189-96.
12. Inderbiten HM, Walters KS, Bukowski AL. The role of social anxiety in adolescent peer relations: differences among sociometric status groups and rejected subgroups. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1997; 26:228-48.
13. Young KS. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior 1996; 1:237-44.
14. Sular J. (1996) Internet addiction: an interview with Morris Jones of Internet Australasia magazine. Available at: www.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/ ausinterview.html.
15. Shepherd RM, Edelmann RJ. Caught in the Web. The Psychologist 2001; 14:520-1.
16. Peter J, Valkenburg PM, Schouten AP. Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the Internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2005; 8:423-30.
17. Brennan PF, Moore SM, Smyth KA. Alzheimer's disease caregivers' uses of a computer network. Western Journal of Nursing Research 1992; 14:662-73.
18. Suler J. To get what you need: healthy and pathological Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior 1999; 2:385-94.
19. Hwang CJ. A study of parent-adolescent adjustment and parental disciplinary attitude. Journal of Education and Psychology 1986; 9:83-96.
20. Wang SH. A study of the effects of cross-district placement and its related problems at elementary and junior high schools. Educational Psychology and Counseling 1984; Taipei: Nation Taiwan Normal University.
21. Leary MR. A brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1983; 9:371-5.
22. Bentler PM, Bonnet DG. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structure. Psychological Bulletin 1980; 88:588-606.