Is reduced female survival after mating a by-product of male-male competition in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea?

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 7, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Teuschl, Y ^a   Hosken, D J ^a,b   Blanckenhorn, W U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; COMPETITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPULATION; FAMILY; FATHER; FEMALE; FLY; GENETIC TRAIT; HARM REDUCTION; LONGEVITY; MALE; MATING; NONHUMAN; PROGENY; REPRODUCTION; SURVIVAL; ANIMAL; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SURVIVAL RATE;

DIPTERA; SCATHOPHAGIDAE; SEPSIDAE; SEPSIS CYNIPSEA;

ANIMALS; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; DIPTERA; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; LONGEVITY; MALE; REPRODUCTION; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 37249029967     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-194     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila Heredity. AJ Bateman, 1948 2 349 368
2. Parental investment and sexual selection. RL Trivers, Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man Chicago IL, Aldine Press, Campbell B, 1972 136 179
3. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. GA Parker, Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects London, Academic Press, Blum MS, Blum NA, 1979 123 166
4. R Thornhill J Alcock, The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press 1983
5. Sex and conflict. L Partridge LD Hurst, Science 1998 281 2003 2008 10.1126/science.281.5385.2003 9748155
6. Sexual conflict in animals. CM Lessels, Levels of Selection Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press, Keller L, 1999 75 99
7. Sexual conflict. T Chapman G Arnqvist J Bangham L Rowe, Trends Ecol Evol 2003 18 41 47 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00004-6
8. G Arnqvist L Rowe, Sexual Conflict Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press 2005
9. How important is sexual conflict? D Hosken R Snook, Am Nat 2005 165 S1 S4 10.1086/429355
10. Introduction. Sexual conflict: A new paradigm? T Tregenza N Wedell T Chapman, Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 2006 316 229 234 10.1098/rstb.2005.1796
11. Sexual conflict and life histories. N Wedell C Kvarnemo CM Lessells T Tregenza, Anim Behav 2006 71 999 1011 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.023
12. Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. B Holland WR Rice, Evolution 1998 52 1 7 10.2307/2410914
13. The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict. CM Lessells, Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 2006 361 301 317 10.1098/rstb.2005.1795
14. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. GA Parker, Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 2006 361 235 259 10.1098/rstb.2005.1785
15. Intergenomic conflict interlocus antagonistic coevolution and the evolution of reproductive isolation. WR Rice, Endless Forms: Species and Speciation Oxford, Oxford University Press, Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, 1998 261 270
16. Evolutionary conflicts of interest: are female sexual decisions different? WG Eberhard, Am Nat 2005 165 S19 S25 10.1086/429348 15795858
17. Genital damage kicking and early death. HS Crudgington MT Siva-Jothy, Nature 2000 407 855 856 10.1038/35038154 11057654
18. Copulation, genital damage and early death in Callosobruchus maculatus. PE Eady L Hamilton RE Lyons, Procs Roy Soc Lond B 2007 274 247 252 10.1098/rspb.2006.3710
19. Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectualarius. AD Stutt MT Siva-Jothy, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001 98 5683 5687 11331783 10.1073/pnas.101440698
20. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. T Chapman LF Lidde JM Kalb MF Walfran L Partridge, Nature 1995 373 241 244 10.1038/373241a0 7816137
21. Longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans reduced by mating but not gamete production. D Gems DL Riddle, Nature 1996 379 723 725 10.1038/379723a0 8602217
22. Sex peptide causes mating costs in female Drosophila melanogaster. S Wigby T Chapman, Curr Biol 2005 15 316 321 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.051 15723791
23. How males can gain by harming their mate: sexual conflict seminal toxins and the cost of mating. RA Johnstone L Keller, Am Nat 2000 156 368 377 10.1086/303392
24. Why are males bad for females? Models for the evolution of damaging male mating behaviour. CM Lessells, Am Nat 2005 165 S46 S63 10.1086/429356 15795861
25. Sexual conflict in Sepsis cynipsea : female reluctance fertility and mate choice. DJ Hosken OY Martin J Born F Huber, J evol Biol 2003 16 485 490 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00537.x 14635848
26. Adaptation versus pleiotropy: why do males harm their mates? EH Morrow G Arnqvist S Pitnick, Behav Ecol 2003 14 802 806 10.1093/beheco/arg073
27. Why do Callosobruchus maculates harm their mates? M Edvarsson T Tregenza, Behav Ecol 2005 16 788 793 10.1093/beheco/ari055
28. Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition. P Stockley, Trends Ecol Evol 1997 12 154 159 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01000-8
29. Correlated effects of sperm competition and postmating female mortality. A Civetta AG Clark, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000 97 13162 13165 11078508 10.1073/pnas.230305397
30. Females avoid manipulative males and live longer. AJ Moore PA Gowaty PJ Moore, J evol Biol 2003 16 523 530 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00527.x 14635853
31. Balancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and mate competition. AJ Moore PJ Moore, Proc Roy Soc Lond B 1999 266 711 716 10.1098/rspb.1999.0694
32. Reproductive behaviour of Sepsis cynipsea (L) (Diptera - Sepsidae). I. A preliminary analysis of the reproductive strategy and its associated behaviour patterns. GA Parker, Behaviour 1972 41 172 206
33. Sexual conflict in the dungfly Sepsis cynipsea. PI Ward J Hemmi T Röösli, Funct Ecol 1992 6 649 653 10.2307/2389959
34. Coercive mating fluctuating asymmetry and male mating success in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. GR Allen LW Simmons, Anim Behav 1996 52 737 741 10.1006/anbe.1996.0218
35. The effects of size on the mating behaviour of the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. PI Ward, Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1983 13 75 80 10.1007/BF00295078
36. Female choice female reluctance to mate and sexual selection on body size in the dungfly Sepsis cynipsea. WU Blanckenhorn C Mühlhäuser C Morf T Reusch M Reuter, Ethology 2000 106 577 593 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2000.00573.x
37. The effect of sexual size dimorphism on mating behaviour in two dung flies with contrasting dimorphism. A Ding WU Blanckenhorn, Evol Ecol Res 2002 4 259 273
38. The reluctant fly: What makes Sepsis cynipsea females willing to copulate? Y Teuschl WU Blanckenhorn, Anim Behav 2007 73 85 97 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.03.028
39. The function of female resistance behavior: Intromissiom by male coercion vs female cooperation in Sepsis flies (Diptera: Sepsidae). WG Eberhard, Rev Biol Trop 2002 50 485 505 12298280
40. The costs of avoiding matings in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. C Mühlhäuser WU Blankenhorn, Behav Ecol 2002 13 359 365 10.1093/beheco/13.3.359
41. Costs and benefits of evolving under experimentally enforced polyandry or monogamy. OY Martin DJ Hosken, Evolution 2003 57 2765 2772 14761055
42. The costs of copulating in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. WU Blanckenhorn DJ Hosken OY Martin C Reim Y Teuschl PI Ward, BehavEcol 2002 13 353 358
43. Copulation and sperm transfer in Archisepsis flies (Diptera: Sepsidae) and the evolution of their intromittent genitalia. WG Eberhard BA Huber, Stud Dipterol 1998 5 217 248
44. KS Schulz, The Evolution of Mating Systems in Black Scavenger Flies (Diptera: Sepsidae) PhD Dissertation University of Arizona 1999
45. The estimation of genetic correlations from phenotypic correlations: a test of Cheverud's conjecture. DA Roff, Heredity 1995 74 481 490
46. DA Roff, Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics New York, Chapman & Hall 1997
47. A comparison of methods to estimate cross-environment genetic correlations. PA Astles AJ Moore RF Preziosi, J evol Biol 2006 19 114 122 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00997.x 16405583
48. Copulation reduces male but not female longevity in Saltella sphondylii (Diptera: Sepsidae). OY Martin DJ Hosken, J evol Biol 2004 17 357 362 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00668.x 15009269
49. Size-dependent effects of temperature and food stress on energy stores and survival in yellow dung flies (Diptera: Scathophagidae). C Reim Y Teuschl WU Blanckenhorn, Evol Ecol Res 2006 8 1215 1234
50. Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. S Pitnick F Garcia-Gonzalez, Proc R Soc Lond B 2002 269 1821 1828 10.1098/rspb.2002.2090
51. Fitness effects of female mate choice: preferred males are detrimental for Drosophila melanogaster females. U Friberg G Arnqvist, J evol Biol 2003 16 797 811 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00597.x 14635895
52. Male age mating probability and mating costs in the fly Sepsis cynipsea. OY Martin RR Leugger N Zeltner DJ Hosken, Evol Ecol Res 2003 5 119 129
53. The evolution of polyandry: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. JA Zeh DW Zeh, Proc R Soc Lond B 1996 263 1711 1717 10.1098/rspb.1996.0250
54. Genetic incompatability mate choice and patterns of parentage. T Tregenza N Wedell, Mol Ecol 2000 9 1013 1027 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00964.x 10964221
55. Patterns of divergence in the effects of mating on female reproductive performance in flour beetles. T Nilsson C Fricke G Arnqvist, Evolution 2002 56 111 120 11913656
56. Female × male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. AG Clark DJ Begun T Prout, Science 1999 283 217 220 10.1126/science.283.5399.217 9880253
57. Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. GT Miller S Pitnick, Science 2002 298 1230 1233 10.1126/science.1076968 12424377
58. Heteropopulation males have a fertilization advantage during sperm competition in the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria). DJ Hosken WU Blanckenhorn TWJ Garner, Proc R Soc Lond B 2002 269 1701 1707 10.1098/rspb.2002.2094
59. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. TA Mousseau DA Roff, Heredity 1987 59 181 197 3316130
60. Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. DA Roff TA Mousseau, Heredity 1987 58 103 118 3818341
61. On the heritability of life-history traits. T Price D Schluter, Evolution 1991 45 853 861 10.2307/2409693
62. The quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. C Mühlhäuser WU Blanckenhorn, Behaviour 2004 141 327 341 10.1163/156853904322981888
63. Is the heritability for courtship and mating speed in Drosophila (fruit fly) low? AA Hoffmann, Heredity 1999 82 158 162 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884640 10098264
64. Population variation in sexual selection and its effect on size allometry in two dung fly species with contrasting sexual size dimorphism. U Kraushaar WU Blanckenhorn, Evolution 2002 56 307 321 11926499
65. Sexual selection on morphological and physiological traits and fluctuating asymmetry in the black scavenger fly Sepsis cynipsea. WU Blanckenhorn U Kraushaar Y Teuschl C Reim, J evol Biol 2004 17 629 641 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00693.x 15149405
66. Quantitative genetics of the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea : Cheverud's conjecture revisited. T Reusch WU Blanckenhorn, Heredity 1998 81 111 119 10.1038/sj.hdy.6883680
67. Different growth responses to temperature and resource limitation in three fly species with similar life histories. WU Blanckenhorn, Evol Ecol 1999 13 395 409 10.1023/A:1006741222586
68. Strategic ejaculation in the common dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. OY Martin DJ Hosken, Anim Behav 2002 63 541 546 10.1006/anbe.2001.1929
69. AA Hoffmann PA Parsons, Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress Oxford, Oxford University Press 1991
70. Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. GS Wilkinson, Nature 1984 308 181 184 10.1038/308181a0
71. Selection for starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster : physiological correlates enzyme activities and multiple stress responses. LG Harshman AA Hoffmann AG Clark, J evol Biol 1999 12 370 379 10.1046/j.1420-9101. 1999.00024.x