The influence of perceptions of task similarity/difference on learning transfer in second language writin

Written Communication

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 76-103

  James, Andrew Mark ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic English; Content; ESL; Freshman composition; Topic

Indexed keywords

EID: 37249025064     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088307309547     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Axelrod, R.B., & Cooper, C.R. (2004). The St. Martin's guide to writing (7th ed.). Boston: St. Martin's.
2. Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K.J. (1989). Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 153-166.
3. Bazerman, C., Little, J., Bethel, L., Chavkin, T., Fouquette, D., & Garufis, J. (2005). Reference guide to writing across the curriculum. Retrieved June 1, 2007, from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/bazerman_wac/
4. Beaufort, A. (1998). Transferring writing knowledge to the workplace: Are we on track? In M. S. Garay & S. A. Bernhardt (Eds.), Expanding literacies: English teaching and the new workplace (pp. 179-199). New York: State University of New York Press.
5. Bekins, L.K., Huckin, T.N., & Kijak, L. (2004). The personal statement in medical school applications: Rhetorical structure in a diverse and unstable context. Issues in Writing, 15, 56-75.
6. Carter, M. (1990). The idea of expertise: An exploration of cognitive and social dimensions of writing. College Composition and Communication, 41, 265-286.
7. Crandall, J., & Kaufman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Content-based instruction in higher education settings. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
8. Currie, P. (1993). Entering a disciplinary community: Conceptual activities required to write for one introductory university course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2(2), 101-117.
9. Currie, P. (1999). Transferable skills: Promoting student research. English for Specific Purposes, 18(4), 329-345.
10. Detterman, D.K. (1993). The case for the prosecution: Transfer as an epiphenomenon. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 1-24). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Pare, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Dyke Ford, J. (2004). Knowledge transfer across disciplines: Tracking rhetorical strategies from a technical communication classroom to an engineering classroom. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, 301-315.
13. Flower, L., & Hayes, J.R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
14. Foertsch, J. (1995). Where cognitive psychology applies: How theories about memory and transfer can influence composition pedagogy. Written Communication, 12, 360-383.
15. Gick, M.L., & Holyoak, K.J. (1987). The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. In S. M. Cormier & J. D. Hagman (Eds.), Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications (pp. 9-47). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16. Hansen, J.G. (2000). Interactional conflicts among audience, purpose, and content knowledge in the acquisition of academic literacy in an EAP course. Written Communication, 17(1), 27-52.
17. Haskell, R.E. (2001). Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction, and reasoning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18. Hirvela, A. (1997). " Disciplinary portfolios" and EAP writing instruction. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 83-100.
19. Horowitz, D. (1986). What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 445-462.
20. Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 21, 385-395.
21. Jacobs, H.L., Zingraf, S.A., Wormuth, D.R., Hartfiel, V.F., & Hughey, J.B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
22. James, M.A. (2006). Transfer of learning from a university content-based EAP course. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 783-806.
23. Johns, A.M. (1988). The discourse communities dilemma: Identifying transferable skills for the academic milieu. English for Specific Purposes, 7, 55-60.
24. Johns, A.M. (1990). Coherence as a cultural phenomenon: Employing ethnographic principles in the academic milieu. In U. Connor & A. M. Johns (Eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 209-226). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
25. Johns, A.M. (1993). Reading and writing tasks in English for academic purposes classes: Products, processes, and resources. In J. G. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom (pp. 274-289). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
26. Johns, A.M. (1995). Genre and pedagogical purposes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 181-190.
27. Johns, A.M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Johnston, S.S. (1994). An ethnographic study of content-based language instruction in the context of an English for academic purposes program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia.
29. Jordan, R.R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Kaufman, D., & Crandall, J. (Eds.). (2005). Content-based instruction in primary and secondary school settings. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
31. Leki, I. (1995). Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 235-260.
32. Leki, I., & Carson, J.G. (1994). Students' perceptions of EAP writing instruction and writing needs across the disciplines. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 81-101.
33. Leki, I., & Carson, J.G. (1997). " Completely different worlds": EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 39-69.
34. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35. McCarthy, L.P. (1987). A stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(3), 233-265.
36. Mikulecky, L., Albers, P., & Peers, M. (1994). Literacy transfer: A review of the literature (Tech. Rep. TR94-05). Philadelphia: National Center on Adult Literacy.
37. O'Donnell, A., Dansereau, D.F., Rocklin, T., Lambiotte, J.G., Hythecker, V.I., & Larson, C.O. (1985). Cooperative writing: Direct effects and transfer. Written Communication, 2, 307-315.
38. Pea, R.D. (1987). Socializing the knowledge transfer problem. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 639-663.
39. Perkins, D.N., & Salomon, G. (1988). Teaching for transfer. Educational Leadership, 46, 22-32.
40. Perkins, D.N., & Salomon, G. (1994). Transfer of learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 11, 2nd ed., pp. 6452-6457). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
41. Petraglia, J. (1995). Introduction: General writing skills instruction and its discontents. In J. Petraglia (Ed.), Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction (pp. xi-xvii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Ross, B.H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 629-639.
43. Rowan, K.E. (1990). Cognitive correlates of explanatory writing skill: An analysis of individual differences. Written Communication, 7, 316-341.
44. Russell, D. (1995). Activity theory and its implications for writing instruction. In J. Petraglia (Ed.), Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction (pp. 51-77). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Russell, D.R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504-554.
46. Russell, D.R., & Yañez, A. (2003). Big picture people rarely become historians: Genre systems and the contradictions of general education. In C. Bazerman & D. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/ writing society: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 331-362). Retrieved May 21, 2007, from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/ selves_societies/russell/
47. Smagorinsky, P., & Smith, M.W. (1992). The nature of knowledge in composition and literary understanding: The question of specificity. Review of Educational Research, 62, 279-305.
48. Snow, M.A. (1993). Discipline-based foreign language teaching: Implications from ESL/EFL. In M. Krueger & F. Ryan (Eds.), Language and content: Discipline- and content-based approaches to language study (pp. 37-56). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
49. Snow, M.A., & Brinton, D. (1988). The adjunct model of language instruction: An ideal EAP framework. In S. Benesch (Ed.), Ending remediation: Linking ESL and content in higher education (pp. 33-52). Washington, DC: TESOL.
50. Spack, R. (1988). Initiating ESL students into the academic discourse community: How far should we go? TESOL Quarterly, 22(1), 29-51.
51. Spack, R. (1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: A longitudinal case study. Written Communication, 14(1), 3-62.
52. Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. Tardy, C. (2006). Researching first and second language genre learning: A comparative review and a look ahead. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 79-101.
54. Tedick, D.J. (1990). ESL writing assessment: Subject-matter knowledge and its impact on performance. English for Specific Purposes, 9, 123-143.
55. Teich, N. (1987). Transfer of writing skills: Implications of the theory of lateral and vertical transfer. Written Communication, 4, 193-208.
56. Thaiss, C., & Zawacki, T.M. (2007). Engaged writers, dynamic disciplines: Research on the academic writing life. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
57. Widdowson, H.G. (1984). Explorations in applied linguistics 2. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
58. Winsor, D.A. (1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.