The effects of web site structure: The role of personal difference

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 749-755

  Chung, Hwiman ^a   Ahn, Euijin ^b  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONALITY; PILOT STUDY; WEB BROWSER;

ADULT; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; HUMANS; INTENTION; INTERNET; MENTAL RECALL; PERSONALITY; PILOT PROJECTS; REFERENCE VALUES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 37249012521     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9955     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Pavlik J. (1996) New media technology. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Steuer J. Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication 1992; 42:73-93.
3. Mohageg MF. The influence of hypertext linking structures on the efficiency of information retrieval. Human Factors 1992; 34:351-67.
4. Morris M, Ogan C. The Internet as mass medium. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1996; 1. Available at: www.asusc.org/jcmc/vol1/ issue4/morris.html.
5. Peppers D, Rogers M. (1993) The one to one future: building relationships one customer at a time. New York: Currency Doubleday.
6. Williams F, Rice RE, Rogers EM. (1988) Research methods and the new media. New York: The Free Press.
7. Shih CE. Conceptualizing consumer experiences in cyberspace. European Journal of Marketing 1998; 32:655-63.
8. Alba J et al. Interactive home shopping: incentives for consumers, retailers, and manufacturers to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing 1997; 61:38-53.
9. Ariely D. Controlling the information flow: effects on consumers' decision making and preferences. Journal of Consumer Research 2000; 27:233-49.
10. Perry SD, Jenzowsky SA, King CM, Yi H, Hester JB, Gartenschlaeger J. Using humorous program as a vehicle for humorous commercials. Journal of Communication 1997; 47:20-38.
11. Schumann DW, Thorson E. The influence of viewing context on commercial effectiveness: a selection-processing model. Current Issues and Research in Advertising 1990; 12:1-24.
12. Broach VC, Page Jr TJ, Wilson RD. Television programming and its influence on viewers' perceptions of commercials: the role of program arousal and pleasantness. Journal of Advertising 1995; 24:45-55.
13. Moon Y. Intimate exchanges: using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research 2000; 26:323-39.
14. Moon Y, Nass CI. How "real" are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction. Communication Research 1996; 23:651-74.
15. Nass CI, Moon Y, Carney P. Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer-based interviewing systems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1999; 29:1093-110.
16. Norman WT. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963; 66:574-83.
17. Cho CH, Leckenby JD. (1999) Interactivity as a measure of advertising effectiveness: antecedents and consequences of interactivity in Web advertising. In: Robert MS, ed., Proceedings of the 1999 Convention of the American Academy of Advertising, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida: American Academy of Advertising, pp. 162-79.
18. MacKenzie SB, Lutz RJ, Belch GE. The role of attitude toward the ad as mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research 1986; 23:28-35.
19. Chen Q, Wells WD. Attitude toward the site. Journal of Advertising Research 1999; 39:27-38.