MRI of the knee at 7.0 tesla

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 179, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1231-1235

  Kraft, Oliver ^a,b   Theysohn, J M ^a,b   Maderwald, S ^a,b   Saylor, C ^c   Ladd, S C ^a,b   Ladd, M E ^a,b   Barkhausen, J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

^c Invivo Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

7 tesla; Cartilage; High field; Knee; MR imaging

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW EDEMA; CARTILAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; BONE AND BONES; CARTILAGE DISEASES; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; KNEE INJURIES; KNEE JOINT; LIGAMENTS, ARTICULAR; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENISCI, TIBIAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 37049001618     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963607     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Schild H. Klinische Hochfeld-MRT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 621-631
2. Bolog N, Nanz D, Weishaupt D. Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives. European Radiology 2006; 16: 1298-1307
3. Ramnath RR. 3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (Part II): clinical applications. MRI clinics of North America 2006: 41-62
4. Link TM, Stahl R, Woertler K. Cartilage imaging: motivation, techniques, current and future significance. European Radiology 2007; 17: 1135-1146
5. Regatte RR, Schweitzer ME. Ultra-high-field MRI of the musculoskeletal system at 7.0 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 262-269
6. Kuo R, Panchal M, Tanenbaum L et al. 3.0 Tesla imaging of the musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 245-261
7. Gold GE, Han E, Stainsby J et al. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast. AJR 2004; 183: 343-351
8. Pakin SK, Cavalcanti C, La Rocca R et al. Ultra-high-field MRI of knee joint at 7.0 T: preliminary experience. Academic radiology 2006; 13: 1135-1142
9. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 1202-1210
10. Hargreaves BA, Cunningham CH, Nishimura DG et al. Variable-rate selective excitation for rapid MRI sequences. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 590-597
11. Bernstein MA, Huston 3 rd J, Ward HA. Imaging artifacts at 3.0 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 735-746
12. Recht MP, Goodwin DW, Winalski CS et al. MRI of articular cartilage: revisiting current status and future directions. AJR 2005; 185: 899-914
13. Hannila I, Nieminen MT, Rauvala E et al. Patellar cartilage lesions: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and t2 relaxation-time mapping. Acta Radiol 2007; 48: 444-448
14. Barr C, Bauer JS, Malfair D et al. MR imaging of the ankle at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens. European Radiology 2007; 17: 1518-1528
15. Gluer CC, Barkmann R, Hahn HK et al. Parametrische biomedizinische Bildgebung - was macht die Qualität quantitativer radiologischer Verfahren aus? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 1187-1201
16. Yuh WT, Christoforidis CA, Koch RM et al. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of brain tumors at ultrahigh field: a state-of-the-art review. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 17: 53-61