Glioma dynamics and computational models: A review of segmentation, registration, and in silico growth algorithms and their clinical applications

Current Medical Imaging Reviews

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 262-276

  Angelini, Elsa D ^a,b,c,d,e   Clatz, Olivier ^a,b,c,d,e   Mandonnet, Emmanuel ^a,b,c,d,e   Konukoglu, Ender ^a,b,c,d,e   Capelle, Laurent ^a,b,c,d,e   Duffau, Hugues ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a INSTITUT TELECOM   (France)

^b INRIA   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^e GUI DE CHAULIAC HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

3D segmentation; Coefficient of variation; Glioma growth; MRI spectroscopy imaging; Tumor volume

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; BASIC RESEARCH; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER MODEL; GLIOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TUMOR GROWTH; TUMOR MODEL; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 36949040564     PISSN: 15734056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/157340507782446241     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Tracqui P, Cruywagen GC, Woodward DE, et al. A mathematical model of glioma growth: the effect of chemotherapy on spatio-temporal growth. Cell Prolif 1995; 28(1): 17-31.
2. Woodward DE, Cook J, Tracqui P, et al. A mathematical model of glioma growth: the effect of extent of surgical resection. Cell Prolif 1996; 29(6): 269-88.
3. Swanson KR, Alvord EC, Jr, Murray JD. A quantitative model for differential motility of gliomas in grey and white matter. Cell Prolif 2000; 33(5): 317-29.
4. Jbabdi S, Mandonnet E, Duffau H, et al. Simulation of anisotropic growth of low-grade gliomas using diffusion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54(3): 616-24.
5. Gibbs P, Buckley DL, Blackband SJ, et al. Tumour volume determination from MR images by morphological segmentation. Phys Med Biol 1996; 41(11): 2437-46.
6. Kennedy DN, Filipek PA, Caviness V. Anatomic segmentation and volumetric calculations in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1989; 8: 1-7.
7. Letteboer MMJ, Olsen OF, Dam EB, et al. Segmentation of tumors in magnetic resonance brain images using an interactive multiscale watershed algorithm. Acad Radiol 2004; 11: 1125-1138.
8. Droske M, Meyer B, Rumpf M, et al. An adaptive level set method for interactive segmentation of intracranial tumors. Neurol Res 2005; 27(4): 363-70.
9. Vaidyanathan M, Clarke LP, Velthuizen R.P, et al. Comparison of supervised MRI segmentation methods for tumor volume determination during therapy. Map Reson Imaging 1995; 13(5): 719-28.
10. Clark M, Hall LO, Goldgof, DB, et al. Automatic tumor segmentation using knowledge-based techniques. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1998; 17(2): 187-201.
11. Kaus MR, Warfield SK, Nabavi A, et al. Automated segmentation of MR images of brain tumors. Radiology 2001; 218(2): 586-91.
12. Kaus M.R, Warfield SK, Jolesz FA, et al. Segmentation of meningiomas and low grade gliomas in MRI. in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention. 1999. Cambridge, UK.
13. Warfield SK, Kaus MR, Jolesz FA, et al. Adaptive template moderated spatially varying statistical classification. in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI). 1998. Cambridge, MA, USA.
14. Moonis G, Liu J, Udupa JK, et al. Estimation of tumor volume with fazzy-connectedness segmentation of MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23(3): 356-63.
15. Nyul LG, Udupa JK. On standardizing the MR image intensity scale. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42: 1072-1081.
16. Liu J, Udupa JK, Odhner D, et al. A system for brain tumor volume estimation via MR imaging and fuzzy connectedness. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2005; 29(1): 21-34.
17. Fletcher-Heath LM, Hall LO, Goldgof DB, et al. Automatic segmentation of non-enhancing brain tumors in magnetic resonance images. Artif Intell Med 2001; 21(1-3): 43-63.
18. Mazzara GP, Velthuizen RP, Pearlman JL, et al. Brain tumor target volume determination for radiation treatment planning through automated MRI segmentation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 59(1): 300-12.
19. Beyer GP, Velthuizen RP, Murtagh FR, et al. Technical aspects and evaluation methodology for the application of two automated brain MRI tumor segmentation methods in radiation therapy planning. Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24(9): 1167-78.
20. Zou KH, Wells WM, 3rd, Kikinis R, et al. Three validation metrics for automated probabilistic image segmentation of brain tumours. Stat Med 2004; 23(8): 1259-82.
21. Prastawa M, Bullitt E, Ho S, et al. A brain tumor segmentation framework based on outlier detection. Med Image Anal 2004; 8: 275-283.
22. Stadlbauer A, Moser E, Gruber S, et al. Improved delineation of brain tumors: an automated method for segmentation based on pathologic changes of 1H-MRSI metabolites in gliomas. Neuroimage 2004; 23(2): 454-61.
23. Warfield SK, Zou KH, Wells WM. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2004; 23(7): 903 -921.
24. Angelini E, Atif J, Delon J, et al. Detection of glioma evolution on longitudinal MRI studies. in International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). 2007. Arlington USA.
25. Khotanlou H, Colliot O, Atif J, et al. 3D brain tumor segmentation in MRI using fuzzy classification, symmetry analysis and spatially constrained deformable models. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2007(in press).
26. Dou W, Ruan S, Chen Y, et al. A framework of fuzzy information fusion for segmentation of brain tumor tissues on MR images. Image and Vision Computing 2007; 25: 164-172.
27. Pallud J, Devaux B, Nataf F, et al. [Spatial delimitation of low grade oligodendrogliomas]. Neurochirurgie 2005; 51(3-4 Pt 2): 254-9.
28. Rey D, Subsol G, Delingette H, et al. Automatic detection and segmentation of evolving processes in 3D medical images: Application to multiple sclerosis. Med Image Anal 2002; 6(2): 163-79.
29. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, et al. Nonrigid registration using free-from deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999; 18(8): 712-21.
30. Kiebel SJ, Ashburner J, Poline JB, et al. MRI and PET coregistration-a cross validation of statistical parametric mapping and automated image registration. Neuroimage 1997; 5(4 Pt 1): 271-9.
31. Clatz O, Delingette H, Talos IF, et al. Robust nonrigid registration to capture brain shift from intraoperative MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005; 24(11): 1417-27.
32. Ferrant M, Nabavi A, Macq B, et al. Serial registration of intraoperative MR images of the brain. Med Image Anal 2002; 6(4): 337-59.
33. Pitiot A, Bardinet E, Thompson PM, et al. Piecewise affine registration of biological images for volume reconstruction. Med Image Anal 2006; 10(3): 465-83.
34. Arsigny V, Pennec X, Ayache N. Polyrigid and polyaffine transformations: a novel geometrical tool to deal with non-rigid deformations - application to the registration of histological slices. Med Image Anal 2005; 9(6): 507-23.
35. Commowick O, Stefanescu R, Fillard P, et al. Incorporating statistical measures of anatomical variability in atlas-to-subject registration for conformal brain radiotherapy. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2005; 8(Pt 2): 927-34.
36. Stefanescu R, Pennec X, Ayache N. Grid powered nonlinear image registration with locally adaptive regularization. Med Image Anal 2004; 8(3): 325-42.
37. Thirion JP. Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons. Med Image Anal 1998; 2(3): 243-60.
38. Vercauteren T, Pennec X, Malis E, et al. Insight into efficient image registration techniques and the Demons algorithm. In Infor Proc Med Imag (IPMI'07). 2007.
39. Roche A, Malandain G, Ayache N, et al. Towards a better comprehension of similarity measures used in medical image registration., in Int. Conf. on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI). 1999. p. 555-566.
40. Zollei L, Fisher JW, Wells WM. A unified statistical and information theoretic framework for multi-modal image registration. Inf Process Med Imaging 2003; 18: 366-77.
41. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, et al. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16(2): 187-98.
42. Wells WM, 3rd, Viola P, Atsumi H, et al. Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Image Anal 1996; 1(1): 35-51.
43. Pennec X, Stefanescu R, Arsigny V, et al. Riemannian elasticity: a statistical regularization framework for non-linear registration. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2005; 8(Pt 2): 943-50.
44. Stefanescu R, Cominowick O, Malandain G, et al. Non-rigid atlas to subject registration with pathologies for conformal brain radiotherapy. In Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2005; 8(Pt 2): 927-34.
45. Davatzikos C, Shen D, Mohamed A, et al. A framework for predictive modeling of anatomical deformations. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20(8): 836-43.
46. Mohamed A, Zacharaki EI, Shen, D, et al. Deformable registration of brain tumor images via a statistical model of tumor-induced deformation. Med Image Anal 2006; 10(5): 752-63.
47. Prastawa M, Bullitt E, Gerig G. Synthetic ground truth for validation of brain tumor MRI segmentation. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2005; 8(Pt 1): 26-33.
48. Bondiau PY, Malandain G, Chanalet S, et al. Atlas-based automatic segmentation of MR images: validation study on the brainstem in radiotherapy context. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61(1): 289-98.
49. Mandonnet E, Jbabdi S, Taillandier L, et al. Preoperative estimation of residual volume for WHO grade II glioma resected with intraoperative functional mapping. Neuro Oncol 2007; 9(1): 63-9.
50. Sanchez Castro F, Clatz O, Dauguet J, et al. Evaluation of brain image nonrigid registration algorithms based on Log-Euclidean MR-DTI consistency measures. in IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). 2007.
51. Section for Biomedical Image Analysis, Upenn.
52. LesionMask - MRIcro - Chris Rorden.
53. Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit.
54. MedINRIA - Asclepios Research Project Team.
55. Slicer3 - NAMIC.
56. Kansal AR, Torquato S, Chiocca EA, et al. Emergence of a subpopulation in a computational model of tumor growth. J Theor Biol 2000-207(3): 431-41.
57. Kansal AR., Torquato S, Harsh GI, et al. Simulated brain tumor growth dynamics using a three-dimensional cellular automaton. J Theor Biol 2000; 203(4): 367-82.
58. Kansal AR, Torquato S, Harsh IG, et al. Cellular automaton of idealized brain tumor growth dynamics. Biosystems 2000; 55(1-3): 119-27.
59. Gunduz C, Yener B, Gultekin SH. The cell graphs of cancer. Bioinformatics 2004; 20 Suppl 1: I145-I151.
60. Palfi S, Swanson KR., De Bouard S, et al. Correlation of in vitro infiltration with glioma histological type in organotypic brain slices. Br J Cancer 2004; 91(4): 745-52.
61. Bru A, Albertos S, Luis Subiza, J, et al. The universal dynamics of tumor growth. Biophys J 2003; 85(5): 2948-61.
62. Guiot C, Degiorgis PG, Delsanto PP, et al. Does tumor growth follow a "universal law"? J Theor Biol 2003; 225(2): 147-51.
63. Guiot C, Delsanto PP, Carpinteri A, et al. The dynamic evolution of the power exponent in a universal growth model of tumors. J Theor Biol 2006; 240(3): 459-63.
64. Morris M, Greiner R, Sander J, et al. Learning a classification-based glioma growth model using MRI data. J Comput 2006; 1(7): 21-31.
65. Giese A, Bjerkvig R, Berens ME, et al. Cost of migration: invasion of malignant gliomas and implications for treatment. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(8): 1624-36.
66. Mandonnet E, Capelle L, Duffau H. Extension of paralimbic low grade gliomas: toward an anatomical classification based on white matter invasion patterns. J Neurooncol 2006; 78(2): 179-85.
67. Scherer H. The forms of growth in gliomas and their practical significance. Brain 1940; 63: 1-35.
68. Clatz O, Sermesant M, Bondiau PY, et al. Realistic simulation of the 3-D growth of brain tumors in MR images coupling diffusion with biomechanical deformation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005; 24(10): 1334-46.
69. Mojsilovic A, Rogowitz B, Gomes J, et al. Analysis and 3D reconstruction of heterogeneity in malignant brain tumors: an interdisciplinary case study using a novel computational visualization approach. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2002; 24(3): 125-33.
70. Burgess PK, Kulesa PM, Murray JD, et al. The interaction of growth rates and diffusion coefficients in a three-dimensional mathematical model of gliomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1997; 56(6): 704-13.
71. Swanson KR, Alvord EC, Jr., Murray JD. Virtual brain tumours (gliomas) enhance the reality of medical imaging and highlight inadequacies of current therapy. Br J Cancer 2002; 86(1): 14-8.
72. Watanabe M, Tanaka R, Takeda N. Magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology of cerebral gliomas. Neuroradiology 1992; 34(6): 463-9.
73. Kircher MF, Mahmood U, King RS, et al. A multimodal nanoparticle for preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative optical brain tumor delineation. Cancer Res 2003; 63(23): 8122-5.
74. Leppert J, Krajewski J, Kantelhardt SR, et al. Multiphoton excitation of autofluorescence for microscopy of glioma tissue. Neurosurgery 2006; 58(4): 759-67; discussion 759-67.
75. Toms SA, Lin WC, Weil RJ, et al. Intraoperative optical spectroscopy identifies infiltrating glioma margins with high sensitivity. Neurosurgery 2005; 57(4 Suppl): 382-91; discussion 382-91.
76. Ganslandt O, Stadlbauer A, Fahlbusch R, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging integrated into image-guided surgery: correlation to standard magnetic resonance imaging and tumor cell density. Neurosurgery 2005; 56(2 Suppl): 291-8; discussion 291-8.
77. Harpold HL, Alvord EC, Jr.,Swanson KR. The evolution of mathematical modeling of glioma proliferation and invasion. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2007; 66(1): 1-9.
78. Dunning MD, Kettunen MI, Ffrench Constant C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of functional Schwann cell transplants labelled with magnetic microspheres. Neumimage 2006; 31(1): 172-80.
79. Gao X, Yang L, Petros JA, et al. In vivo molecular and cellular imaging with quantum dots. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2005; 16(1): 63-72.
80. Mandonnet E, Delattre JY, Tanguy ML, et al. Continuous growth of mean tumor diameter in a-subset of grade II gliomas. Ann Neurol 2003; 53(4): 524-8.
81. Pallud J, Mandonnet E, Duffau H, et al. Prognostic value of initial magnetic resonance imaging growth rates for World Health Organization grade II gliomas. Ann Neurol 2006; 60(3): 380-3.
82. Konukoglu E, Clatz O, Bondiau PY, et al. Extrapolating tumor invasion margins for physiologically determined radiotherapy regions. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computerized Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2006; 1: 338-46.
83. Mandonnet E, Pallud, J, Clatz, O, et al. Computational modelling of WHO grade II gliomas: Principles and applications to surgical strategy. Neurosurg Rev 2007; Submitted.
84. Ricard, D, Kaloshi, G, Amiel-Benouaich, A, et al. Dynamic history of low-grade gliomas before and after temozolomide treatment. Ann Neurol 2006; In Press.