Defining financial conflicts and managing research relationships: An analysis of university conflict of interest committee decisions

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 415-435

  Boyd, Elizabeth A ^a   Bero, Lisa A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict of interest; Decision making; Qualitative analysis; Research ethics; Research integrity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGAL ASPECT; ORGANIZATION; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

CALIFORNIA; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; DISCLOSURE; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; HUMANS; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 36949017232     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 16605454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-007-9041-6     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bird, S. J., & Spier, R. E. (2005). The complexity of competing and conflicting interests. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(4), 515-517.
2. Bero, L. A. (2005). Managing conflicts of interest in research. Journal of the American College of Dentists, 72(2), 4-9.
3. Boyd, E. A., & Bero, L. A. (2000). Assessing faculty financial relationships with industry. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(November 1), 2209-2238.
4. Boyd, E., Lipton, S., & Bero, L. A. (2004). Implementation of financial disclosure policies to manage conflicts of interest. Health Affairs, 23(2), 206-214.
5. Lipton, S., Boyd, E. A., & Bero, L. A. (2004). Conflicts of interest in research: Policies, processes and attitudes. Accountability in Research, 11, 83-102.
6. Krimsky, S., Rothenberg, L. S., Stott, P., & Kyle, G. (1996). Financial interests on authors in scientific journals: A principal investigator lot study of 14 publications. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2(4), 395-410.
7. Objectivity in Research (1995). Federal register 35810, Vol. 60.
8. Association of American Medical Colleges (2001). Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress: Guidelines for developing and implementing a policy concerning individual financial interests in human subjects research. Philadelphia: Association of American Medical Colleges.
9. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2007). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication, http://www.icmje.org. Accessed 24 October 2007.
10. Fontarosa, P. B., Flanagin, A., & DeAngelis, C. D. (2005). Reporting conflicts of interest, financial aspects of research, and role of sponsors in funded studies. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(1), 110-111.
11. Van Der Weyden, M. B., & Chew, M. (2005). Managing conflict of interest: Sense and sensibility. The Clinical Biochemist/Reviews, 26(May 2005), 3-5.
12. Thompson, D. (1993). Understanding financial conflicts of interest. New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 573-576.
13. Blumenthal, D. (1996). Ethics issues in academic-industry relationships in the life sciences: The continuing debate. Academic Medicine, 71, 1291-1296.
14. Frankel, M. (1996). Perception, reality, and the political context of conflict of interest in university-industry relationships. Academic Medicine, 71, 1297-1304.
15. Boyd, E. A., Cho, M. K., & Bero, L. A. (2003). Financial conflict-of-interest policies in clinical research: Issues for clinical investigators. Academic Medicine, 78, 769-774.
16. Glaser, B. E., & Bero, L. A. (2005). Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in research: A systematic review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(4), 553-573.
17. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337.
18. Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Conflicts of interest and commitment in academic science in the United States. Minerva, 34, 259-277.
19. State of California (1974). California political reform act in 8100.
20. Cho, M. K., Kim, Y. G., Lee, M. G., & Kim, S. G. (2000). Policies on faculty conflicts of interest at US universities. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(November 1), 2203-2208.
21. Lo, B., Wolf, L. E., & Berkeley, A. (2000). Conflict of interest policies for investigators in clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 343(22), 1616-1619.
22. Shah, S., Whittle, A., Wilfond, B., Gensler, G., & Wendler, D. (2004). How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research? Journal of the American Medical Association, 291(4), 476-482.
23. Edwards, S. J. L., Ashcroft, R., & Kirchin, S. (2004). Research ethics committees: Differences and moral judgement. Bioethics, 18(5), 408-427.
24. University of California Office of the President (2002). UC's NIH research tops $1 billion. University of California.
25. University of California Office of the President (2002) Research funding at UC: FY 2001. University of California.
26. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Atkinson, P. (1990). The ethnographic imagination: Textual constructions of reality. New York: Routledge.
29. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
30. Boyd, E. (1998). Bureaucratic control in "The company of equals": The interactional management of medical peer review. American Sociological Review, 63(2), 200-224.
31. Beach, W. (1996). Conversations about illness: Family preoccupations with bulimia. New York: Lawrence Ehrlbaum Associates.
32. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreffered turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418-441.
34. Maynard, D. (1991). Perspective-display sequences and the delivery and receipt of diagnostic news. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35. Heath, C. (1992). The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general practice consultation. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). In talk at work: Interactions in institutional settings. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.
38. Perakyla, A. (1995). AIDS counselling: Institutional interaction and clinical practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Bergmann, J. (1992). Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Maynard, D. (1984). Inside plea bargaining: The language of negotiation. New York: Plenum.
41. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: The social organization of the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
42. McHoul, A. (1990). The organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society, 7, 183-213.
43. Kendon, A. (1979). Some theoretical and methodological aspects of the use of film in the study of social interaction. In A. Kendon (Ed.), Emerging strategies in social psychological research. New York: Wiley Press.
44. Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Goodwin, M. (1990). He said-she said: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
46. Goodwin, C. (1993). Recording human interaction in natural settings. Pragmatics, 3(2), 181-209.