Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth

Industrial and Corporate Change

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1105-1145

  Castellacci, Fulvio ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NUPI   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMETRICS; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; MANUFACTURING; PRODUCTIVITY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 36849082397     PISSN: 09606491     EISSN: 14643650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtm033     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Acemoglu, D., P. Aghion, and F. Zilibotti (2002), 'Distance to frontier, selection and economic growth,' NBER Working Paper No. 9066.
2. Aghion, P. and P. Howitt (1992), 'A model of growth through creative destruction,' Econometrica, 60, 323-351.
3. Amable, B. and B. Verspagen (1995), 'The role of technology in market shares dynamics,' Applied Economics, 27, 197-204.
4. Azariadis, C. and A. Drazen (1990), 'Threshold externalities in economic development,' Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 501-526.
5. Barba Navaretti, G. and D. G. Tarr (2000), 'International knowledge flows and economic performance: A review of the evidence,' The World Bank Economic Review, 14, 1-15.
6. Bartelsman, E. J. and M. Doms (2000), 'Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal microdata,' Journal of Economic Literature 38, 569-594.
7. Becker, M. (2004), 'Organizational routines: A review of the literature,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 643-677.
8. Benhabib, J. and M. Spiegel (1994), 'The role of human capital in economic development. Evidence from aggregate cross-country data,' Journal of Monetary Economics, 34, 143-173.
9. Breschi, S. and F. Malerba (1997), 'Sectoral innovation systems: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries,' in C. Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organisations. Pinter: London and Washington.
10. Breschi, S., F. Malerba and L. Orsenigo (2000), 'Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation,' Economic Journal, 110, 388-410.
11. Cainelli, G., R. Evangelista and M. Savona (2006), 'Innovation and economic performance in services: A firm-level analysis,' Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 435-458.
12. Castellacci, F. (2006), 'A critical realist interpretation of evolutionary growth theorising,' Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 861-880.
13. Castellacci, F. (2007), 'Evolutionary and new growth theories. Are they converging?,' Journal of Economic Surveys, 21, 585-627.
14. Cefis, E. and L. Orsenigo (2001), 'The persistence of innovative activities: A cross-countries and cross-sectors comparative analysis,' Research Policy, 30, 1139-1158.
15. Chui, M., P. Levine, S. M. Murshed and J. Pearlman (2002), 'North-South models of growth and trade,' Journal of Economic Surveys, 16 123-165.
16. Coe, D. T. and E. Helpman (1995), 'International R&D spillovers,' European Economic Review, 39, 859-887.
17. Coe, D. T., E. Helpman and A. Hoffmaister (1997), 'North-South R&D spillovers,' Economic Journal, 107, 134-149.
18. Cohen, W. M. and R. Levin (1989), 'Empirical studies of innovation and market structure,' in R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. II, Elsevier: North Holland.
19. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1989), 'Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D,' Economic Journal, 99, 569-596.
20. Cohen, W.M. and D. A. Levinthal (1990), 'Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation,' Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
21. Crepon, B., E. Duguet and J. Mairesse (1998), 'Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level,' Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7, 115-158.
22. Dalum, B., K. Laursen and B. Verspagen (1999), 'Does specialization matter for growth?,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 8, 267-288.
23. Darity, W. and L. S. Davis (2005), 'Growth, trade and uneven development,' Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 141-170.
24. David, P., B. Hall and A. Toole (2000), 'Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence,' Research Policy, 29, 497-529.
25. Dosi, G. (1982), 'Technological paradigms and technological trajectories,' Research Policy, 11, 147-162.
26. Dosi, G. (1988), 'Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation,' Journal of Economic Literature, XXVI, 1120-1171.
27. Dosi, G., K. Pavitt and L. Soete (1990), The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade. Harvester Wheatsheaf: London.
28. Dosi, G., Malerba, F., Ramello, G. and Silva, F. (2006a), 'Information, appropriability, and the generation of innovative knowledge four decades after Arrow and Nelson: An introduction,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 891-901.
29. Dosi, G., Marengo, L. and Pasquali, C. (2006b), 'How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation', Research Policy, 35, 1110-1121.
30. Eaton, J. and S. Kortum (1996), 'Trade in ideas - Patenting and productivity in the OECD,' Journal of International Economics, 40, 251-278.
31. Edquist, C. (1997), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organisations. Pinter: London and Washington.
32. Evangelista, R. (1999), Knowledge and Investment. The Sources of Innovation in Industry. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
33. Fagerberg, J. (1988), 'International competitiveness,' Economic Journal, 98, 355-374.
34. Fagerberg, J. (1995), 'User-producer interaction, learning and comparative advantage,' Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 243-256.
35. Fagerberg, J. and B. Verspagen (2000), 'Productivity, R&D spillovers and trade,' in B. van Ark, S.K. Kuipers and G.H. Kuper (eds), Productivity, Technology and Economic Growth. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
36. Fai, F. and N. von Tunzelmann (2001), 'Industry-specific competencies and converging technological systems: Evidence from patents,' Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 12, 141-170.
37. Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J. and Krizan, C. J. (1998), 'Aggregate productivity growth: Lessons from microeconomic evidence,' NBER Working Paper No. 6803.
38. Freeman, C., J. Clark and L. Soete (1982), Unemployment and Technical Innovation. Pinter: London.
39. Galor, O. (2005), 'From stagnation to growth: Unified growth theory,' in P. Aghion and S. Durlauf (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth. Elsevier: North Holland.
40. Galor, O. and D. Tsiddon (1997), 'Technological progress, mobility, and economic growth,' American Economic Review, 87, 363-382.
41. Galor, O. and O. Moav (2000), 'Ability-biased technological transition, wage inequality, and economic growth,' Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 469-497.
42. Galor, O. and D. N. Weil (2000), 'Population, technology and growth: from Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond,' American Economic Review, 110, 806-828.
43. Gittleman, M. and E.N. Wolff (1995), 'R&D activity and cross-country growth comparisons,' Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 189-207.
44. Griffith, R., S. Redding and J. Van Reenen (2004), 'Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries,' Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 883-895.
45. Griliches, Z. (1979), 'Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth,' The Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92-116.
46. Griliches, Z. (1992), 'The search for R&D spillovers,' Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29-47.
47. Grossman, G.M. and E. Helpman (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. The MIT Press: Cambridge, USA.
48. Gujarati, D. N. (1970), 'Use of dummy variables in testing for equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions: A note,' American Statistician, 24, 50-52.
49. Heshmati, A. (2003), "Productivity growth, efficiency and outsourcing in manufacturing and service industries,' Journal of Economic Surveys 17, 79-112.
50. Hulten, C. R. (2000), 'Total factor productivity: A short bibliography,' NBER Working Papers No. 7471.
51. Jaffe, A. B. (1986), 'Technological opportunities and spillovers from R&D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value,' American Economic Review, 76, 984-1001.
52. Kaiser, U. (2002), 'Measuring knowledge spillovers in manufacturing and services: An empirical assessment of alternative approaches,' Research Policy, 31, 125-144.
53. Keller, W. (2000), 'Do trade patterns and technology flows affect productivity growth?,' The World Bank Economic Review, 14, 17-47.
54. Klevorick, A., R. Levin, R. Nelson and S. Winter (1995), 'On the sources and interindustry differences in technological opportunities,' Research Policy, 24, 185-205.
55. Krueger, D. and K. Kumar (2004), 'US-Europe differences in technology-driven growth: Quantifying the role of education,' Journal of Monetary Economics, 51, 161-190.
56. Laursen, K. (1999), 'The impact of technological opportunity on the dynamics of trade performance,' Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 10, 341-357.
57. Laursen, K. and V. Meliciani (2000), 'The importance of technology based inter-sectoral linkages for market share dynamics,' Weltwirtscaftliches Archiv, 136, 702-723.
58. Laursen, K. and V. Meliciani (2002), 'The relative importance of international vis-à-vis national technological spillovers for market share dynamics,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 875-894.
59. Lee, K. and C. Lim (2001), 'Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries,' Research Policy 30, 459-483.
60. Levin, R. C., A. A. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson and S. G. Winter (1987), 'Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D,' Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, 783-820.
61. Los, B. and B. Verspagen (2004), 'Technology spillovers and their impact on productivity,' in H. Hanusch and A. Pyka (eds), Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.
62. Lotti, F. (2007), 'Firm Dynamics in Manufacturing and Services: A Broken Mirror?,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 347-369.
63. Lucas, R. (1988), 'On the mechanics of economic development,' Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.
64. Machin, S. and J. Van Reenen (1998), 'Technology and changes in skill structure: Evidence from seven OECD countries,' Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXIII (4), 1215-1244.
65. Mairesse, J. and P. Mohnen (2002), 'Accounting for innovation and measuring innovativeness: An illustrative framework and an application,' American Economic Review, 92, 226-230.
66. Malerba, F. (2002), 'Sectoral systems of innovation and production,' Research Policy, 31, 247-264.
67. Malerba, F. (2005), 'Sectoral systems: How and why innovation differs across sectors,' in J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
68. Malerba, F. and F. Montobbio (2003), 'Exploring factors affecting international technological specialization: The role of knowledge flows and the structure of innovative activity,' Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 411-434.
69. Malerba, F. and L. Orsenigo (1995), 'Schumpeterian patterns of innovation,' Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 47-65.
70. Malerba, F. and L. Orsenigo (1996), 'Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific,' Research Policy, 25, 451-478.
71. Malerba, F. and L. Orsenigo (2000), 'Knowledge, innovative activities and industrial evolution,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 9 289-314.
72. Marsili, O. and B. Verspagen (2002), 'Technology and the dynamics of industrial structure: An empirical mapping of Dutch manufacturing,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 791-815.
73. Montobbio, F. (2003), 'Sectoral patterns of technological activity and export market share dynamics,' Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 523-545.
74. Mowery, D. and R. Nelson (1999), The Sources of Industrial Leadership Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
75. Mowery, D. and B. Sampat (2005), 'Universities in national innovation systems,' in J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
76. Nadiri, M. I. (1993), 'Innovations and technological spillovers,' NBER Working Paper No. 4423.
77. Nelson, R. R. (1982), 'The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency,' Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, 453-470.
78. Nelson, R. R. (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press: New York and Oxford.
79. Nelson, R. R. and S. G. Winter (1977), 'In search of a useful theory of innovation,' Research Policy, 6, 36-76.
80. Nelson, R. R. and S. G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, USA.
81. Nelson, R. R. and E. N. Wolff (1997), 'Factors behind cross-industry differences in technical progress,' Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8, 205-220.
82. OECD (1996), 'The evolution of skills in OECD countries and the role of technology,' STI Working Papers No. 1996/8.
83. Padoan, P. C. (1998), 'Trade, knowledge accumulation and diffusion: A sectoral perspective,' Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 9, 349-372.
84. Park, K. and K. Lee (2006), 'Linking the technological regime to the technological catch-up: Analysing Korea and Taiwan using US patent data,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 715-753.
85. Pavitt, K. (1984), 'Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory,' Research Policy, 13, 343-373.
86. Pianta, M. (2005), 'Innovation and employment,' in J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
87. Piva, M., E. Santarelli and M. Vivarelli (2005), 'The skill bias effect of technological and organisational change: Evidence and policy implications,' Research Policy, 34, 141-157.
88. Redding, S. (2002), 'Specialization dynamics,' Journal of International Economics, 58, 299-334.
89. Reichstein, T. and A. Salter (2006), 'Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 653-682.
90. Rivera-Batiz, L. and P. Romer (1991), 'International trade and endogenous technological change,' European Economic Review, 35 971-1004.
91. Romer, P. (1986), 'Increasing returns and long-run growth,' Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037.
92. Romer, P. (1990), 'Endogenous technological change,' Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-102.
93. Santarelli, E. and Vivarelli, M. (2007), 'Entrepreneurship and the process of firms' entry, survival and growth,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 455-488.
94. Schumpeter, J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, USA.
95. Schumpeter, J. (1939), Business Cycles. Porcupine Press: Philadelphia.
96. Schumpeter, J. (1943), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper: New York.
97. ten Raa, T. and E. N. Wolff (2000), 'Engines of growth in the US economy,' Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11, 473-489.
98. Tidd, J., J. Bessant and K. Pavitt (1997), Managing Innovation. Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. Wiley: Chichester.
99. Van Dijk, M. (2000), 'Technological Regimes and Industrial Dynamics: The Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing,' Industrial and Corporate Change 9, 173-194.
100. Verspagen, B. (1997a), 'Measuring inter-sectoral technology spillovers: estimates from the European and US patent databases,' Economic Systems Research, 9, 47-65.
101. Verspagen, B. (1997b), 'Estimating international technology spillovers using technology flow matrices,' Weltwirtscaftliches Archiv, 133, 226-248.
102. Veugelers, R. and B. Cassiman (1999), 'Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms,' Research Policy, 28, 63-80.
103. Von Tunzelmann, N. and V. Acha (2005), 'Innovation in "low-tech" industries,' in J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
104. Wieser, R. (2005), 'Research and development productivity and spillovers: Empirical evidence at the firm level,' Journal of Economic Surveys, 19, 587-621.
105. Winter, S. G. (1984), 'Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes,' Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5, 137-158.
106. Winter, S. (2006a), 'Toward a neo-Schumpeterian theory of the firm,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 125-141.
107. Winter, S. (2006b), 'The logic of appropriability: From Schumpeter to Arrow to Teece', Research Policy, 35, 1100-1106.