Digital concept maps for managing knowledge and information

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3426 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 185-204

  Tergan, Sigmar Olaf ^a  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SELF ORGANIZING MAPS;

KNOWLEDGE UTILIZATION; NAVIGATIONAL DISORIENTATION; RESOURCE-BASED LEARNING SCENARIOS;

DATA STRUCTURES;

EID: 36849066989     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11510154_10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (68)

1. st international conference on concept mapping. Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Publia de Navarra. Available online: March 30, 2005: http://cmc.ihmc.us/papers/cmc2004- 206.pdf.
2. Alpert, S.R., & Gruenenberg, K. (2000). Concept mapping with multimedia on the web. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 313-330.
3. Ausubel, D.P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
4. Bleakley, A., & Carrigan, J.L. (1994). Resource-based learning activities: Information literacy for high school students. Chicago: American Library Association.
5. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
6. Brevik, P.S. (1992). Education in the information age. In D.W. Farmer, & T.F. Mech (Eds.), Information literacy: Developing students as independent learners (pp. 5-13). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
7. st century. New York: Scholastic Inc.
8. Bruggen, J.M., Kirschner, P.A., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction 12(1), 121-138.
9. Bruillard, E., & Baron, G.-L. (2000). Computer-Based Concept Mapping: a Review of a Cognitive Tool for Students. In D. Benzie, & D. Passey (Eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Educational Uses of Information and Communication Technologies (ICEUT 2000) (pp. 331-338). Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry (PHEI).
10. Buzan, T. (1995). The Mind Map book. 2 ed. London: BBC Books.
11. Cañas, A.J., Ford, K., & Coffey, J. (1994). Concept Maps as a hypermedia navigational tool. Paper presented at the seventh Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium, Pensacola, Fl.
12. Cañas, A. J., Ford, K. M., Novak, J. D., Hayes, P., Reichherzer, T. R., & Suri, N. (2001). Online Concept Maps: Enhancing collaborative learning by using technology with concept maps. The Science Teacher, 68(2), 49-51.
13. Cañas, A.J., Leake, D.B., & Wilson, D.C (1999). Managing, mapping and manipulating conceptual knowledge. AAA7 Workshop Technical Report WS-99-10: Exploring the synergies of knowledge management & case-based reasoning. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press
14. st international conference on concept mapping (pp. 125-133). Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Publia de Navarra.
15. th, 2004: http://www.ihmc.us/ users/acanas/Publications/CMapsVSWebPagesExp1/CMapsVSWebPagesExpl.htm
16. Carvalho, M., Hewett, R., & Cañas, A.J. (2001). Enhancing web searches from concept-map based knowledge models. In Proceedings of the SCI. Fifth Multi-Conference on Systems, Cybernetics and Informatics. Orlando, FL.
17. Coffey, J.W., Hoffmann, R.R., Cañas, A.J., & Ford, K.M. (2002). A Concept Map-Based Knowledge Modeling Approach to Expert Knowledge Sharing. Available online: February 2004: http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/ acanas/Publications/IKS2002/IKS.htm.
18. Cox, R. (1999). Representation, construction, externalised cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction, 9, 343-363.
19. Cox, R., & Brna, P. (1995). Supporting the use of external representations in problem solving: The need for flexible learning environments. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6(213), 239-302.
20. st international conference on concept mapping (pp. 209-216). Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Publia de Navarra.
21. Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2001). Facilitating the construction of shared knowledge with graphical representation tools in face-to-face and computer-mediated scenarios. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), Proceedings of euro-CSCL 2001 (pp. 230-236). Maastricht: McLuhan Institute.
22. Gaines, B.-R., & Shaw, M.L.G. (1995). Concept maps as hypermedia components. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 43(3), 323-361.
23. Gaines, B.-R., & Shaw, M.L.G. (2002). WebMap: Concept Mapping on the Web. Available online: February 2004: http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/ articles/WWW/WWW4WM/
24. Holley, C.D., & Dansereau, D.F. (1984). The development of spatial learning strategies. In C.D. Holley, & D.F. Dansereaau (Eds.), Spatial learning strategies. Techniques, applications, and related issues (pp. 3-19). New York: Academic Press.
25. Jacobson, M.J., & Levin, J.A. (1995). Conceptual frameworks for network learning environments: Constructing personal and shared knowledge spaces. Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(4), 367-388.
26. Jonassen, D., Carr, C., & Yueh, H.P. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. Teachtrends, March, 24-32.
27. Jonassen, D.H. (1987). Assessing cognitive structure: Verifying a method using pattern notes. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20 (3), 1-14.
28. Jonassen, D.H. (1992). Semantic networking as cognitive tool. In P.A.M. Kommers, D.H. Jonassen, & J.M. Mayer (Eds.), Cognitive tools for learning (pp. 12-22). Berlin: Springer.
29. Jonassen, D.H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). (Eds.). Structural knowledge. Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Jonassen, D.H., Reeves, T.C., Hong, N., Harvey, D., & Peters, K. (1997). Concept mapping as cognitive learning and assessment tools. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8(3/4), 289-308.
31. Kommers, P., & Lanzing, J. (1997). Student's concept mapping for hypermedia design. Navigation through the world wide web (WWW) space and self-assessment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 8(3/4), 421-455.
32. Kommers, P.A.M., Jonassen, D.H., & Mayes, J.T. (Eds.). (1991). Cognitive tools for learning. NATO ASI Series, Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences, Vol. 81. Berlin: Springer.
33. Lambiotte, J.G., & Dansereau, D.F. (1992). Effects of knowledge maps and prior knowledge on recall of science lecture content. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 189-201.
34. Larkin, J.H. (1989). Display-based problem solving. In D. Klahr, & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing. The impact of Heribert Simon (pp. 319-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Larkin, J.H., & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth 10,000 words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-100.
36. Malhotra, Y. (2000). From information management to knowledge management: Beyond the 'Hi-Tech Hidebound' systems. In K. Srikantaiah, & M.E.D. Koenig (Eds.), Knowledge management for the information professional (pp. 37-61). Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc.
37. Maurer, H., & Sapper, M. (2001). E-Learning has to be seen as part of general knowledge management. In C. Montgomerie, & J. Viteli, (Eds.), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2001 (pp. 1249-1253). Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
38. McAleese, R., Grabinger, S., & Fisher, K. (1999). The Knowledge Arena: a learning environment that underpins concept mapping. Paper presented at the AERA '99 conference. (Available online: February 2004: http://www.cst.hw.ac.uk/~ray/3_01.PDF).
39. McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R.J. (1998). Navigation in hyperspace: An evaluation of the effects of navigational tools and subject matter expertise on browsing and information retrieval in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 10, 129-142.
40. Newbern, D., & Dansereau, D.F. (1995). Knowledge Maps for knowledge management. In K.M. Wiig (Ed.), Knowledge management methods: Practical approaches to managing knowledge (Volume 3 of Knowledge Management Series). Arlington TX: Schema Press.
41. Novak, J.D. (1990). Concept mapping: a useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 937-949.
42. th, 2004, from the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. The University of West Florida Web site: http://cmap.coginst.uwf. edu/info/
43. Novak, J.D., & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Novak, J., Wurst, M., Schneider, M., Fleischmann, M., & Strauss, W. (2003). Discovering, visualizing and sharing knowledge through personalized learning knowledge maps - an agent-based approach. In L. von Eist, V. Dignum, & A. Abecker (Eds.), Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Agent-mediated Knowledge Management (AMKM03) (pp. 213-228). Heidelberg / New York: Springer.
45. O'Donnell, A.M., Dansereau, D.F., & Hall, R.H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 71-86.
46. Paige, J.M., & Simon, H.A. (1966). Cognitive processes in solving algebra and word problems. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving: Research, method and theory (Chap. 3). New York, NY: Wiley.
47. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University.
48. Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.-F. (2003). Effects of content representation and reader's prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58, 327-345.
49. Probst, G., Raub, S., & Romhardt, K. (1999). Wissen managen. Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen. Frankfurt am Main, Wiesbaden: FAZ/Gabler.
50. Rakes, G.C. (1996). Using the internet as a tool in a resource-based learning environment. Educational Technology, September-October, 52-56.
51. Reinmann-Rothmeier, G., & Mandl, H. (2000). Individuelles Wissensmanagement. Strategien für den persönlichen Umgang mit Information und Wissen am Arbeitsplatz. Bern: Huber.
52. Rumelhart, D.E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R.C. Anderson, R.J. Spiro, & W.E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99-133). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Rumelhart, D.E., & Norman, D.A. (1978). Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning. In J.W. Cotton, & R.L. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition (pp. 37-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54. Safayeni, F.N., Derbentseva, A.J., & Cañas, A (in press). A theoretical note on concepts and the need for cyclic concept maps. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
55. Shavelson, R.J., Lang, H., & Lewin, B. (1994). On concept maps as potential "authentic" assessments in science. (Technical Report 388). Los Angeles: UCLA, Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE/CRESST).
56. Shen, R., Richardson, R., & Fox, E. (n.d.). Concept maps as visual interfaces to digital libraries: summarization, collaboration, and automatic generation. (Available onlineJanuary 20, 2004: http://vw.indiana.edu/ ivira03/shen-et-al.pdf)
57. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism. A learning theory for the digital age. Int. J. of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1). (Available online: January 20, 2005: http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/ article01.htm).
58. Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J., & Coulson, R.L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31, 24-33.
59. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
60. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
61. Tergan, S.-O. (2003). Managing knowledge with computer-based mapping tools. In D. Lassner, & C. Mc Naught (Eds.), Proceedings of the ED-Media 2003 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunication, Honolulu, Hawaii (pp. 2514-2517). Norfolk, VA: AACE.
62. Tergan, S.-O., Gräber, W., & Reinmann-Rothmeier, G. (2003). A framework for research on mapping tools as means for managing individual knowledge. Paper presented at the EARLI '03 Symposium "Managing knowledge with computerized mapping tools", Padova, Italy (August 26-30, 2003).
63. Wallace, D.S., West, S.W.C., Ware, A., & Dansereau, D.F. (1998). The effect of knowledge maps that incorporate gestalt principles on learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 5-16.
64. Weideman, M., & Kritzinger, W. (2003). Concept Mapping - a proposed theoretical model for implementation as a knowledge repository. Working paper from the "ICT in Higher Education" research project. University of Western Cape - South Africa. Available online: January 20, 2005: http://www.uwc.ac.za/ems/is/hicte.
65. Wiegmann, D.A., Dansereau, D.F., McCagg, E.C., Rewey, K.L., & Pitre, U. (1992). Effects of knowledge map characteristics on information processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 136-155.
66. Williams, D. (1997). Concept Mapping: foundations, research, and implications for hypermedia/multimedia design. Paper presented at ED-MEDIA 97-World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Calgary, Canada, 1997.
67. Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 179-217.
68. Zhang, J., & Norman, D.A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87-122.