The role of content representations in hypermedia learning: Effects of task and learner variables

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3426 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 343-354

  Rouet, Jean Francois ^a   Potelle, Hervé ^a   Goumi, Antonine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SELF ORGANIZING MAPS; USER INTERFACES;

CONTENT REPRESENTATIONS; HYPERMEDIA DOCUMENTS; HYPERMEDIA LEARNING; KNOWLEDGE VISUALIZATION;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 36849066330     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11510154_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Brandsford, J.D., & Johnson, M.K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations in comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
2. Carmel, E., Crawford, S., & Chen, H. (1992). Browsing in hypertext: A cognitive study. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22(5), 865-884.
3. Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J.H. (1995). Learning from electronic texts: Effects of interactive overviews for information access. Cognition & Instruction, 13(3), 431-468.
4. Dooling, DJ., & Lachman, R. (1971). Effects of retention on the comprehension of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 216-222.
5. Glenberg, A.M., & Langsten, W.E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: pictures help build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 129-151.
6. Goldman, S.R., & Rakestraw Jr., J.A. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. III (pp. 311-335). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Goumi, A., Rouet, J.-F., & Aubert, D. (2003). The effectiveness of three types of interfaces on information access in an educational CD-Rom. Paper presented at the European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction. Padova, Italy, August 26-30.
8. Guthrie, J.T. (1988). Locating information in documents: examination of a cognitive model. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 178-199.
9. Guthrie, J.T., & Kirsch, I. (1987). Distinctions between reading comprehension and locating information in text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 210-228.
10. Hofman, R., & van Oostendorp, H. (1999). Cognitive effects of a structural overview in a hypertext. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 129-140.
11. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
12. Kieras, D.E. (1980). Initial mention as a signal to thematic content in technical passages. Memory and Cognition, 8, 345-353.
13. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
14. Kintsch, W., Kozminsky, E., Streby, W.J., McKoon, G., & Keenan, J.M. (1975). Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables. Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 196-214.
15. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
16. Kintsch, W., & Yarbrough, J.C. (1982). Role of rhetorical structure in text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 828-834.
17. Kozminsky, E. (1977). Altering comprehension: the effect of biasing title on text comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 5, 482-490.
18. Lorch, R.F., & Lorch, E.P. (1996). Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 38-48.
19. Mannes, S. (1994). Strategic processing of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 577-588.
20. McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R.J. (1998). An evaluation of the effects of navigational tools and subject matter expertise on browsing and information retrieval in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 10, 129-142.
21. Meyer, B.J.F. (1985). Prose analysis: purposes, procedures, and problems. In B.K. Britton, & J.B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 11-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Nielsen, J. (1999). Designing Web Usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders.
23. Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.-F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers' prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 327-345.
24. Rouet, J.-F. & Tricot, A. (1996). Task and activity models in hypertext usage. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. de Mul (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing (pp. 239-264). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Rouet, J.-F., Vidal-Abarca, E., Bert-Erboul, A., & Millogo, V. (2001). Effects of information search tasks on the comprehension of instructional text. Discourse Processes, 31(2), 163-186.
26. Shapiro, A.M. (1999). The relationship between prior knowledge and interactive overviews during hypermedia-based learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(2), 143-167.
27. Spyridakis, J.H., & Standal, T.C. (1987). Signals in expository prose: Effects on reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 285-298.
28. van den Broek, P., Virtue, S., Gaddy Everson, M., Tzeng, Y., & Sung, Y. (2001). Comprehension and memory for science texts: Inferential processes and the construction of a mental representation. In J. Otero, J. A. Leon, & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension (pp. 131-154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Wiley, J. & Rayner, K. (2000). Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1011-1021.