Damage potential of near-source ground motion records

8th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2006

Volumn 9, Issue , 2006, Pages 5061-5070

  Bazzurro, Paolo ^a   Luco, Nicolas ^a,b  

^a AIR Worldwide   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROGRAMS; DAMAGE POTENTIAL; ELASTIC PEAK; FUNDAMENTAL PERIOD; GROUND MOTION INTENSITY MEASURES; GROUND MOTIONS; LINEAR ELASTIC; NONSTATIONARY; RESPONSE ESTIMATES; RESPONSE VARIABILITY; SIGNAL CHARACTERISTIC; SINGLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM; SPECIFIC YIELD; SPECTRAL ACCELERATION; SPECTRAL DISPLACEMENT; SPECTRAL VALUE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL VIBRATIONS; VELOCITY PULSE;

CIVIL ENGINEERING; GRAPHIC METHODS; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY;

EID: 36849087207     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Abrahamson, N.A., 1993. Non-stationary spectral matching program RSPMATCH. User Manual.
2. Alavi, B., and H. Krawinkler, 2001. Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures. Blume Center Rept. No.138; Dept. of Civil Engrg., Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
3. Bazzurro, P, and C.A. Cornell, 2002. Vector-valued Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (VPSHA). Proc. of 7US NCEE, Boston, Massachusetts, Paper No. 61.
4. Bazzurro, P., and N. Luco, 2006a. Do scaled and spectrum matched near-source records produce biased structural responses?, Proc. of 8US NCEE, Paper No. 1209, San Francisco, CA, April 18-22.
5. Bazzurro, P., and N. Luco, 2006b. Beyond spectral quantities to improve structural response estimation. Submitted to Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, November, 2005.
6. Comartin, C., 2002. A progress report on ATC-55: Evaluation and improvements of inelastic seismic analysis procedures (Fall 2002). Applied Technology Council (ATC), Redwood City, California.
7. FEMA 355C, 2000. State of the art report on system performance of steel moment frames subject to ground shaking. Federal Emergency Management Agency; Washington, D.C.
8. Huang, N.E., et al., 1998. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc. of the Royal Society of London, 454: 903-995.
9. Iwan WD, Huang C-T, and A.C. Guyader, 1998. Evaluation of the effects of near-source ground motions. Report Developed for the PG&E/PEER Program, CalTech, Pasadena, California.
10. Luco, N., 2002. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis, SMRF connection fractures, and near-source effects. Ph.D. Dissertation; Dept. of Civil Engrg., Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
11. MacRae, G.A., and C.W., Roeder, 1999. Near-field ground motion effects on short structures. Report for the PG&E/PEER Program, Dept. of Civil Engrg., University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
12. Sewell, R.T., 1993. Impacts of earthquake strong-motion duration on inelastic structural response factors and on ground-motion damage potential. RIE Report prepared for California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (CSMIP); Sacramento, California.
13. Trifunac, M.D., and A.G., Brady, 1975. A study of the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65: 581-626.