A projection-based level-set approach to enhance conductivity anomaly reconstruction in electrical resistance tomography

Inverse Problems

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 2375-2400

  Ben Hadj Miled, M K ^a   Miller, E L ^b  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Tufts University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; INVERSE PROBLEMS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TOMOGRAPHY;

ANOMALY RECONSTRUCTION; ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE TOMOGRAPHY (ERT);

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY;

EID: 36749089673     PISSN: 02665611     EISSN: 13616420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/23/6/007     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Bell F G 2004 Engineering Geology and Construction 1st edn (London: Spon)
2. Holder D 1993 Clinical and Physiological Applications of Electrical Impedance Tomography 1st edn (London: UCL Press)
3. Harris N D, Suggett A J, Barber D and Brown B 1987 Applications of applied potential tomography (APT) in respiratory medicine Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 8 155-65
4. Cheney M, Isaacson D and Newell J C 1999 Electrical impedance tomography SIAM Rev. 41 85-101
5. Frerichs I, Hahn G and Hellige G 1999 Thoracic electrical impedance tomographic measurements during volume controlled ventilation-effects of tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18 764-73
6. Chrepenin V A, Karpov A Y, Korjenevsky A V, Kornienko V N, Kultiasov Y S, Ochapkin M B, Trochanova O V and Meister J D 2002 Three-dimensional EIT imaging of breast tissues: system design and clinical testing IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 662-7
7. Frerichs I, Hinz J, Herrmann P, Weisser G, Hahn G, Quintel M and Hellige G 2002 Regional lung perfusion as determined by electrical impedance tomography in comparison with electron beam CT imaging IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 646-52
8. Gonçalves S I, de Munck J C, Verbunt J P A, Bijma F, Heethaar R M and da Silva F L 2003 In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using and EIT-based method and realistic models for the head IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 754-67
9. Choi M H, Kao T J, Isaacson D, Saulnier G J and Newell J C 2007 A reconstruction algorithm for breast cancer imaging with electrical impedance tomography in mammography geometry IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54 700-10
10. Alessandrini G and Rondi L 1998 Stable determination of a crack in a planar inhomogeneous conductor SIAM J. Math. Anal. 30 326-40
11. Santosa F and Vogelius M S 1991 A computational algorithm to determine cracks from electrostatic boundary measurements Int. J. Eng. Sci. 29 917-38
12. Santosa F, Kaup P and Vogelius M S 1996 A method for imaging corrosion damage in thin plates from electrostatic data Inverse Problems 12 279-93
13. Cedio-Fengya D J, Moskow S and Vogelius M S 1998 Identification of conductivity imperfections of small diameter by boundary measurements continuous dependence and computational reconstruction Inverse Problems 14 553-95
14. Dines K and Lytle R 1981 Analysis of electrical conductivity imaging Geophysics 46 1025-36
15. Parker R L 1984 The problem of resistivity sounding Geophysics 142 2143-58
16. Ramirez A, Daily W, Binley B, LaBrecque D J and Roelant D 1996 Detection of leaks in underground storage tanks using electrical resistance methods J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 1 189-203
17. Yuval and Oldenburg D W 1996 DC resistivity and IP methods in acid mine drainage problems: results from the Copper Cliff mine tailings impoundments J. Appl. Geophys. 34 187-98
18. Daily W and Ramirez A L 2000 Electrical imaging of engineered hydraulic barriers Geophysics 65 83-94
19. Pidlisecky A, Knight R and Haber E 2006 Cone-based electrical resistivity tomography Geophysics 71 G157-G167
20. Caldéron A P 1980 On an inverse boundary value problem Seminar on Numerical Analysis and its Applications to Continuum Physics, Soc. Brasileira de Matemtica pp 65-73
21. Kohn R V and Vogelius M 1984 Determining conductivity by boundary measurements Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 37 289-98
22. Kohn R V and Vogelius M 1985 Determining conductivity by boundary measurements: II. Interior results Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 38 643-67
23. Sylvester J and Uhlmann G 1987 A global uniqueness theorem for an inverse boundary value problem Ann. Math. 125 ((2)) 153-69
24. Nachmann A I, Sylvester J and Uhlmann G 1988 An n-dimensional Borg-Levinson theorem Commun. Math. Phys. 115 595-605
25. Borcea L 2002 Electrical impedance tomography Inverse Problems 18 R99-R136
26. Brown B H 2003 Electrical impedance tomography (EIT): A review J. Med. Eng. Technol. 3 97-108
27. Lionheart W R 2004 EIT reconstruction algorithms: pitfalls, challenges and recent developments Physiol. Meas. 1 125-42
28. Barber D C and Brown B H 1986 Recent developments in applied potential tomography-apt Information Processing in Medical Imaging ed S L Bacharach (Amsterdam: Nijhoff) pp 106-21
29. Santosa F and Vogelius M S 1990 A backprojection algorithm for electrical impedance imaging SIAM J. Appl. Math. 50 216-43
30. Frangi A F, Riu P J, Rosell J and Viergever M A 2002 Propagation of measurement noise through backprojection reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 566-78
31. Cheney M, Isaacson D, Newell J C, Simske S and Goble J C 1990 NOSER: an algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 2 66-75
32. Le Hyaric A and Pidcock m K 2001 An image reconstruction algorithm for three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48 230-5
33. Curtis E B and Morrow J A 1990 Determining the resistors in a network SIAM J. Appl. Math. 50 931-41
34. Somersalo E, Cheney M, Isaacson D and Isaacson E 1991 Layer stripping: a direct numerical method for impedance imaging Inverse Problems 7 899-926
35. Sylvester J 1992 A convergent layer stripping algorithm for radially symmetric impedance tomography problem Commun. Partial Diff. Eqns 17 1955-94
36. Siltanen S, Mueller J and Isaacson D 2000 An implementation of the reconstruction algorithm of A Nachman for the 2D inverse conductivity problem Inverse Problems 16 681-99
37. Mueller J and Siltanen S 2003 Direct reconstructions of conductivities from boundary measurements SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24 1232-66
38. Brühl M 2001 Explicit characterization of inclusions in electrical impedance tomography SIAM J. Math. Anal. 32 1327-41
39. Hanke M and Brühl M 2003 Recent progress in electrical impedance tomography Inverse Problems 16 651-63
40. Oldenburg D W, McGillivray P R and Ellis R G 1993 Generalized subspace methods for large-scale inverse problems Geophys. J. Int. 114 12-20
41. Oldenburg D W and Yaoguo Li 1994 Subspace linear inverse method Inverse Problems 10 915-35
42. Ellis R G and Oldenburg D W 1994 Applied geophysics inversion Geophysics J. Int. 116 5-11
43. Zhang J, Mackie R L and Madden T R 1995 3-D resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients Geophysics 60 1313-25
44. LaBrecque D J, Morelli G, Daily W, Ramirez A and Lundegard P 1999 Occam's inversion of 3D ERT data Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics, SEG ed B Spies (Tulsa, OK) pp 575-90
45. Ellis R G and Oldenburg D W 1994 3-D DC-resistivity inverse problem: a conjugate gradient approach Geophys. J. Int. 119 187-95
46. Haber E, Ascher U M and Oldenburg D W 2000 On optimization techniques for solving nonlinear inverse problems Inverse Problems 16 1263-80
47. Haber E and Ascher 2001 U M Preconditioned all-at-one methods for large, sparse parameter estimation problems Inverse Problems 17 1847-64
48. Newmann G A and Boggs P T 2004 Solution accelerators for large-scale three-dimensional electromagnetic inverse problems Inverse Problems 20 S151-S170
49. Haber E 2005 Quasi-Newton methods for large-scale electromagnetic inverse problems Inverse Problems 21 305-23
50. Lechleiter A and Rieder A 2006 Newton regularizations for impedance tomography: a numerical study Inverse Problems 22 1967-87
51. Ascher U M, Haber E and Huang H 2006 On effective methods for implicit piecewise smooth surface recovery SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 28 339-58
52. Haber E and Tenorio L 2003 Learning regularization functionals-a supervised training approach Inverse Problems 19 611-26
53. Borcea L, Gray G A and Zhang Y 2003 Variationally constrained numerical solution of electrical impedance tomography Inverse Problems 19 1159-84
54. Vauhkonen M, Kaipio J P, Somersalo E and Karjalainen P A 1997 Electrical impedance tomography with basis constraints Inverse Problems 13 523-30
55. Kaipio J P, Kolehmainen, Somersalo E and Vauhkonen M 2000 Statistical inversion and Monte Carlo sampling methods in electrical impedance tomography Inverse Problems 16 1487-522
56. Yang X 1999 Stochastic inversion of 3-D ERT data PhD Thesis University of Arizona
57. Chou K C and Willsky A S 1989 A multi-resolution, probabilistic approach to two dimensional inverse conductivity problem Signal Process. 18 291-311
58. Borcea L 2001 A nonlinear multigrid for imaging electrical conductivity and permittivity at low frequency Inverse Problems 17 329-58
59. Ascher U M and Haber E 2001 Grid refinement and scaling for distributed parameter estimation problems Inverse Problems 17 571-90
60. Santosa F 1996 A level set approach for inverse problems involving obstacles ESAIM: Control, Optimisation Calculus Variations 1 17-33
61. Harabetian E and Osher S 1998 Regularization of ill-posed problems via the level set approach SIAM J. Appl. Math. 58 1689-1706
62. Litman A, Lesselier D and Santosa F 1998 Reconstruction of a two-dimensional binary obstacle by controlled evolution of a level-set Inverse Problems 14 685-706
63. Dorn O, Miller E L and Rappaport C M 2000 A shape reconstruction method for electromagnetic tomography using adjoint fields and level sets Inverse Problems 16 1119-56
64. Ito K, Kunisch K and Li Z 2001 Level-set function approach to an inverse interface problem Inverse Problems 17 1225-42
65. Burger M 2001 A level set method for inverse problems Inverse Problems 17 1327-55
66. Chan T F and Tai X C 2003 Level set and total variational regularization for elliptic inverse problems with discontinuous coefficients J. Comput. Phys. 193 40-66
67. Chung E T, Chan T F and Tai X C 2005 Electrical impedance tomography using level set representation and total variational regularization J. Comput. Phys. 205 357-72
68. Ben Hadj Miled M K and Miller E L 2001 On the extension of level-set curve evolution methods for low-sensitivity imaging problems ICIP Proc. II 625-8
69. Soleimani M, Lionheart W R B and Dorn O 2006 Level set reconstruction of conductivity and permittivity from boundary electrical measurements using experimental data Inverse Problems Sci. Eng. 14 193-210
70. Soleimani M, Dorn O and Lionheart W R B 2006 A narrow-band level set method applied to EIT in brain for cryosurgery monitoring IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53 2257-64
71. Berger M 2004 Levenberg-Marquardt level set methods for inverse problems Inverse Problems 20 259-82
72. van den Doel K and Ascher U M 2006 On level set regularization for highly ill-posed distributed parameter estimation problems J. Comput. Phys. 216 707-23
73. Dorn O and Lesselier D 2006 Level set methods for inverse problems Inverse Problems 22 R67-131
74. Osher S and Sethian J 1988 Fronts propagation with curvature dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations J. Comput. Phys. 56 12-49
75. Ben Ameur H, Burger M and Hackl B 2004 Level set methods for geometric inverse problems in linear elasticity Inverse Problems 20 673-96
76. Sethian J A 1999 Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)