Level set reconstruction of conductivity and permittivity from boundary electrical measurements using experimental data

Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 193-210

  Soleimani, M ^a   Lionheart, W R B ^a   Dorn, O ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

ECT; ERT; Level set function; Shape reconstruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 30544449867     PISSN: 10682767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17415970500264152     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Vauhkonen, M., Lionheart, W.R.B., Heikkinen, L.M., Vauhkonen, P.J. and Kaipio, J.P., 2001, A MATLAB package for the EIDORS project to reconstruct two-dimensional EIT images. Physiological Measurement, 22, 107-111.
2. Yang, W.Q., Spink, D.M., York, T.A. and McCann, H., 1999, An image-reconstruction algorithm based on Landweber's iteration method for electrical-capacitance tomography. Measurement Science and Technology, 10, 1065-1069.
3. Lionheart, W.R.B., 2001, Reconstruction algorithms for permittivity and conductivity imaging. In: Proc. 2nd World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Hannover, Germany, pp. 1-4.
4. Tamburrino, A., Rubinacci, G., Soleimani, M. and Lionheart, W.R.B., 2003, A noniterative inversion method for electrical resistance, capacitance and inductance tomography for two phase materials, In: Proc. 3rd World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Banff Canada, pp. 233-238.
5. Kolehmainen, V., Arridge, S.R., Lionheart, W.R.B., Vauhkonen, M. and Kaipio, J.P., 1999, Recovery of region boundaries of piecewise constant coefficients of an elliptic PDE from boundary data. Inverse Problems, 15, 1375-1391.
6. Brühl, M. and Hanke, M., 2000, Numerical implementation of two noniterative methods for locating inclusions by impedance tomography. Inverse Problems, 16, 1029-1042.
7. Brühl, M., 2001, Explicit characterization of inclusions in electrical impedance tomography. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 32, 1327-1341.
8. Ikehata, M. and Siltanen, S., 2004, Electrical impedance tomography and Mittag-Leffler's function. Inverse Problems, 20, 1325-1348.
9. Rondi, L. and Santosa, F., 2001, Enhanced electrical impedance tomography via the Mumford-Shah functional. ESAIM: COCV, 6, 517-538.
10. Chan, T.F. and Tai, X.C., 2004, Level set and total variation regularization for elliptic inverse problems with discontinuous coefficients. Journal of Computational Physics, 193, 40-66.
11. Hanke-Bourgeois, M. and Brühl M., 2003, Recent progress in electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Problems, 19, S65-S90.
12. Osher, S. and Sethiasn, J., 1988, Fronts propagation with curvature dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 56, 12-49.
13. Osher, S. and Fedkiw, R., 2003, Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces (New York: Springer).
14. Sethian, J., 1999, Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods, 2nd Edn (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
15. Dorn, O., Miller, E.L. and Rappaport, C.M., 2000, A shape reconstruction method for electromagnetic tomography using adjoint fields and level sets. Inverse Problems, 16, 1119-1156.
16. Litman, A., Lesselier, D. and Santosa, F., 1998, Reconstruction of a two-dimensional binary obstacle by controlled evolution of a level-set. Inverse Problems, 14, 685-706.
17. Santosa, F., 1996, A level-set approach for inverse problems involving obstacles. ESAIM: Control, Optimization and Calculus of Variations, 1, 17-33.
18. Boverman, G., Khames, M. and Miller, E.L., 2003, Recent work in shape-based methods for diffusive inverse problems. Review of Scientific Instruments, 74, 2580-2582.
19. Polydorides, N. and Lionheart, W.R.B., 2002, A MATLAB based toolkit for three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a contribution to the EIDORS project. Measurement Science and Technology, 13, 1871-1883.
20. Soleimani, M., Powell, C.E. and Polydorides, N., 2005, Improving the forward solver for the complete electrode model in EIT using algebraic multigrid. IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging, 24, 577-583.
21. Dyakowski, T., Jeanmeure, L.F.C., Zimmerman, W.B. and Clark, W., 2002, Direct flow-pattern identification using electrical capacitance tomography. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 26, 763-773.
22. Soleimani, M. and Lionheart, W.R.B., 2005, A nonlinear image reconstruction for electrical capacitance tomography using experimental data. Measurement Science and Technology (in press).
23. Somersalo, E., Isaacson, D. and Cheney, M., 1992, A linearized inverse boundary-value problem for Maxwell equation. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 42, 123-136.
24. Burger, M., 2001, A level set method for inverse problems. Inverse Problems, 17, 1327-1355.
25. Ito, K., Kunisch, K. and Li, Z., 2001, Level-set function approach to an inverse interface problem. Inverse Problems, 17, 1225-1242.
26. Leitao, A. and Scherzer, O., 2003, On the relation between constraint regularization, level sets, and shape optimization. Inverse Problems, 19, L1-L11.
27. Zhao, H.K., Chan, T., Merriman, B. and Osher, S., 1996, A variational level set approach to multiphase motion. Journal of Computational Physics, 127, 179-195.
28. Dorn, O., 2002, Shape reconstruction in scattering media with voids using a transport model and level sets. The Canadian Applied Mathematics Quarterly, 10, 239-275. Also MSRI Preprint, http://www.msri.org/publications/preprints/online/2002-002.html
29. Soleimani, M., Aykroyd, R.G., Freear, S., Lionheart, W.R.B. and Podd, F., 2005, Multi-modal data fusion for enhanced imaging applied to 3D ERT with Ultrasound time of flight data. Proceedings of 4th World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Aizo, Japan (in press).