Incorporating geostatistical constraints in nonlinear inversion problems

Water Resources Research

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2007, Pages

  Johnson, T C ^a   Routh, P S ^b   Clemo, T ^b   Barrash, W ^b   Clement, W P ^b  

^a IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

INVERSION PROBLEMS; SEMIVARIOGRAMS;

CONSTRAINT THEORY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; DATA REDUCTION; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

GEOSTATISTICS; OPTIMIZATION; RADAR; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TOMOGRAPHY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VARIOGRAM;

EID: 36749027576     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2006WR005185     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aldridge, D., and D. Oldenburg (1993), Two dimensional tomographic inversion with finite-difference traveltimes, J. Seismic Explor., 2, 257-274.
2. Anderman, E., M. Hill, and E. Poeter (1996), Two-dimensional advective transport in ground-water flow parameter estimation, Groundwater, 34(6), 1001-1009.
3. Anderson, M. (1997), Characterization of geologic heterogeneity, in Subsurface Flow and Transport: A Stochastic Approach, Int. Hydrol. Ser., edited by G. Dagan and S. Neuman, chap. 2.1, pp. 23-43, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
4. Barrash, W., and T. Clemo (2002), Hierarchical geostatistics and mulfifacies systems: Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, Boise, Idaho, Water Resour. Res., 38(10), 1196, doi:10.1029/2002WR001436.
5. Barrash, W., and M. Knoll (1998), Design of a research wellfield for calibrating geophysical methods against hydrologic parameters, paper presented at Conference on Hazardous Waste Research, Great Plains/Rocky Mt. Hazardous Substance Res. Cent., Kans. State Univ., Snowbird, Utah.
6. Capilla, J., J. Gomez-Hernandez, and S. Andres (1998), Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data - 2. Demonstration on a synthetic aquifer, J. Hydrol., 203, 175-188.
7. Carrera, J., A. Alcolea, A. Medina, J. Hildalgo, and L. Slooten (2005), Inverse problem in hydrogeology, Hydrogeol. J., 13, 206-222.
8. Clifton, P., and S. Neuman (1982), Effects of kriging and inverse modeling on conditional simulation of the Avra Valley aquifer in southern Arizona, Water Resour. Res., 18(4), 1215-1234.
9. Copty, N., and Y. Rubin (1995), A stochastic approach to the characterization of lithofacies from surface seismic and well data, Water Resour. Res., 31(7), 1673-1686.
10. Day-Lewis, F., J. Harris, and S. Gorelick (2002), Time-lapse inversion of crosswell radar data, Geophysics, 69(6), 1740-1752.
11. Deutsch, C., and A. Journel (1998), GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and Users Guide, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York.
12. Doherty, J. (2003), Ground water model calibration using pilot points and regularization, Groundwater, 41(2), 170-177.
13. Ferre, P., D. Rudolph, and R. Kachanoski (1996), Spatial averaging of water content by time domain reflectometry: Implications for twin rod probes with and without dielectric coatings, Water Resour. Res., 32(2), 271-279.
14. Gilks, W., S. Richardson, and D. J. Spiegelhalter (1996), Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, Chapman and Hill, London.
15. Gomez-Hernandez, J., A. Sahuquillo, and J. Capilla (1997), Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data - I. Theory, J. Hydrol., 203, 162-174.
16. Hill, M. (1998), Methods and guidelines for effective model calibration, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 98-4005.
17. Hubbard, S., and Y. Rubin (2000), Hydrogeological parameter estimation using geophysical data: A review of selected techniques, Contam. Hydrol., 45, 3-34.
18. Hubbard, S., Y. Rubin, and E. Majer (1999), Spatial correlation structure estimation using geophysical and hydrogeological data, Water Resour. Res., 35(6), 1809-1826.
19. Hyndman, D., J. Harris, and S. Gorelick (1994), Coupled seismic and tracer test inversion for aquifer property characterization, Water Resour. Res., 30(7), 1965-1977.
20. Isaaks, E., and R. Srivastava (1989), Applied Geostatistics, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
21. Journel, A., and C. Huijbregts (1978), Mining Geostatistics, Academic, New York.
22. Jussel, P., F. Stauffer, and T. Dracos (1994), Transport modeling in heterogeneous aquifers: 2. Three-dimensional transport model and stochastic numerical tracer experiments, Water Resour. Res., 30(6), 1819-1831.
23. Kitanidis, P., and E. Vomvoris (1983), A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modeling (steady state) and one dimensional simulations, Water Resour. Res., 19(3), 677-690.
24. Kupfersberger, H., and C. Deutsch (1999), Methodology for integrating analog geologic data in 3-D variogram modeling, AAPG Bull., 83(8), 1262-1278.
25. McKenna, S., and E. Poeter (1995), Field example of data fusion in site characterization, Water Resour. Res., 31(12), 3229-3240.
26. Medina, A., and J. Carrera (2003), Geostatistical inversion of coupled problems: Dealing with the computational burden and different tvpes of data, J. Hydrol., 281, 251-264.
27. Menke, W. (1989), Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, Academic, San Diego, Calif.
28. Neuman, S. (1973), Calibration of distributed parameter groundwater flow models viewed as a multiple objective decision process under uncertainty, Water Resour. Res., 9(4), 1006-1021.
29. Neuman, S. (1994), Generalized scaling of permeabilities: Validation and effect of support scale, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21(5), 349-352.
30. Oldenborger, G. (2006), Advances in electrical resistivity tomography: Modeling, electrode position errors, time-lapse monitoring of an injection/withdrawal experiment, and solution appraisal, Ph.D. dissertation, Boise State Univ., Boise.
31. Oliver, D., L. Cunha, and A. Reynolds (1997), Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for conditioning a permeability field to pressure data, Math. Geol., 29(1), 61-91.
32. Paige, C., and M. Saunders (1982), LSQR: An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares, Trans. Math. Software, 8(1), 43-71.
33. Parker, R. (1994), Geophysical Inverse Theory, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N. J.
34. Sudicky, E., and P. Huyakom (1991), Contaminant migration in imperfectly known heterogeneous groundwater systems, Rev. Geophys., 29, 240-253.
35. Tikhonov, A. (1963), Regularization of incorrectly posed problems, Sov. Math. Dokl., Engl. Transl., 4, 1624-1627.
36. Tonkin, M., T. Clemo, and J. Doherty (2003), Computationally efficient regularized inversion for highly parameterized modflow models, in MODFLOW and More 2003: Understanding through Modeling, pp. 595-599, Int. Groundwater Modeling Cent., Golden, Colo.
37. Topp, G., J. Davis, and A. Annan (1980), Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines, Water Resour. Res., 16(3), 574-582.
38. Zhou, C., L. Lui, and J. Land (2001), Nonlinear inversion of borehole-radar tomography data to reconstruct velocity and attenuation distribution in Earth materials, J. Appl. Geophys., 47, 271-284.
39. Zimmerman, D., et al. (1998), A comparison of seven geostatistically based inverse approaches to estimate transmissivities for modeling advective transport by groundwater flow, Water Resour. Res., 34(6), 1373-1414.