Ordered multiple comparisons with the best and their applications to dose-response studies

Biometrics

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1143-1151

  Strassburger, K ^a   Bretz, F ^b   Finner, H ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Fixed order testing principle; Maximum effective dose; Maximum useful dose; Multiple hypotheses testing; Partitioning principle

Indexed keywords

STATISTICAL TESTS;

DOSE LEVELS; DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY; EFFECTIVE DOSE; FIXED-ORDER; FIXED-ORDER TESTING PRINCIPLE; LOWER CONFIDENCE BOUND; MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE DOSE; MAXIMUM USEFUL DOSE; MULTIPLE HYPOTHESES TESTING; PARTITIONING PRINCIPLE;

BIOMETRICS;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA SET; DISEASE TREATMENT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; RISK ASSESSMENT; TESTING METHOD;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE DOSE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 36749019174     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00813.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Broström, G. (1981). On sequentially rejective subset selection procedures. Communication in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Series A 10, 203 221.
2. Desu, M. M. (1970). A selection problem. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 41, 1596 1603.
3. Dunnett, C. W. (1955). A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association 50, 1096 1121.
4. Finner, H. and Giani, G. (1994). Closed subset selection procedures for selecting good populations. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 38, 179 200.
5. Finner, H. and Giani, G. (1996). Duality between multiple testing and selecting. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 64, 201 227.
6. Finner, H. and Giani, G. (2001). Least favorable parameter configurations for a step-down subset selection procedure. Biometrical Journal 43, 543 552.
7. Finner, H. and Strassburger, K. (2002). The partitioning principle: A powerful tool in multiple decision theory. The Annals of Statistics 30, 1194 1213.
8. Finner, H. and Strassburger, K. (2006). On δ-equivalence with the best in k-sample models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101, 737 746.
9. Finner, H., Giani, G., and Strassburger, K. (2006). Partitioning principle and selection of good populations. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 136, 2053 2069.
10. Genz, A. and Bretz, F. (2002). Methods for the computation of multivariate t-probabilities. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 11, 950 971.
11. Gupta, S. (1965). On some multiple decision (selection and ranking) rules. Technometrics 7, 225 245.
12. Hayter, A. (1990). A one-sided studentized range test for testing against a simple order alternative. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 778 785.
13. Hayter, A. (1992). Multiple comparisons of three ordered normal means for unbalanced models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 13, 153 162.
14. Hsu, J. (1984). Ranking and selection and multiple comparisons with the best. In T. Santner and A. C. Tamhane (eds Design of Experiments, Ranking and Selection. Essays in Hon. of R.E. Bechhofer, Statistical Textbooks Monographs 56, 23 33.
15. Hsu, J. (1996). Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods. London : Chapman and Hall.
16. Hsu, J. and Berger, R. (1999). Stepwise confidence intervals without multiplicity adjustment for dose-response and toxicity studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94, 468 482.
17. ICH-E4 1994). Ich harmonized tripartite guideline. Topic E4: dose-response information to support drug registration. Available at : www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/ich/037895en.pdf.
18. Lam, K. (1986). A new procedure for selecting good populations. Biometrika 76, 201 206.
19. Marcus, R., Peritz, E., and Gabriel, K. (1976). On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 63, 655 660.
20. Montgomery, D. (1977). Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York : Wiley.
21. Naik, U. (1977). Some subset selection problems. Communication in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Series A 6, 955 966.
22. Pan, G. (1997). Confidence subset containing the unknown peaks of an umbrella ordering. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92, 307 314.
23. Ruberg, S. J. (1995). Dose response studies II. Analysis and interpretation. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 5, 15 42.
24. Saville, D. J. and Wood, G. R. (1991). Statistical Methods: The Geometric Approach. New York : Springer.
25. Slepian, D. (1962). The one-sided barrier problem for Gaussian noise. Bell System Technical Journal 41, 463 501.
26. Ting, N. (2003). Dose response study design. In S. Chow (ed Encyclopedia of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 2nd edition, 304 310. New York : Marcel Dekker Inc.