Stepwise Confidence Intervals without Multiplicity Adjustment for Dose—Response and Toxicity Studies

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 94, Issue 446, 1999, Pages 468-482

  Hsu, Jason C ^a   Berger, Roger L ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542742904     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: 1537274X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1999.10474141     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bauer, P. (1997), “A Note on Multiple Testing Procedures in Dose Finding,” Biometrics, 53, 1125-1128.
2. Berger, R. L. (1982), “Multiparameter Hypothesis Testing and Acceptance Sampling,” Technometrics, 24, 295-300.
3. Berger, R. L., and Boos, D. D. (1999), “Confidence Limits for the Onset and Duration of Treatment Effect,” unpublished manuscript submitted to Biometrical Journal.
4. Berger, R. L., and Hsu, J. C. (1996), “Bioequivalence Trials, Intersection- Union Tests, and Equivalence Confidence Sets,” Statistical Science, 11, 283-315.
5. Bofinger, E. (1987), “Stepdown Procedures for Comparison With a Control,” Australian Journal of Statistics, 29, 348-364.
6. Bofinger, E., and Bofinger, M. (1995), “Equivalence With Respect to a Control: Stepwise Tests,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 57, 721-733.
7. Committee for Proprietary Medical Products (CPMP)/EWP/233/95 (1995), Note for Guidance on the Clinical Investigation of Medical Products in the Treatment of Chronic Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease, The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products, final edition.
8. Consumer Union (1992), “Udder Insanity,” Consumer Reports, 57, 330-332.
9. Dunnett, C. W. (1955), “A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments With a Control,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 1096-1121.
10. Environmental Protection Agency (1993), Reference Dose (RfD): Description and Use in Health Risk Assessment. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
11. Hauschke, D. (1997), “Statistical Proof of Safety in Toxicological Studies,” Drug Information Journal, 31, 357-361.
12. Hochberg, Y., and Tamhane, A. C. (1987), Multiple Comparison Procedures, New York: Wiley.
13. Horowitz, J. M., and Thompson, D. (1993), “Udder Insanity!” Time, 141, 52-53.
14. Hsu, J. C. (1996), Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods, London: Chapman and Hall.
15. International Conference on Harmonization (1994), Dose Response Information to Support Drug Registration, Guideline E4, London: Committee for Proprietary Medical Products, The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products.
16. Juskevich, J. C., and Guyer, C. G. (1990), “Bovine Growth Hormone: Human Food Safety Evaluation,” Science, 249, 875-884.
17. Koch, G. G., and Gansky, S. A. (1996), “Statistical Considerations for Multiplicity in Confirmatory Protocols,” Drug Information Journal, 30, 523-534.
18. Lehmann, E. L. (1986), Testing Statistical Hypotheses (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.
19. Marcus, R., Peritz, E., and Gabriel, K. R. (1976), “On Closed Testing Procedures With Special Reference to Ordered Analysis of Variance,” Biometrika, 63, 655-660.
20. Maurer, W., Hothorn, L. A., and Lehmacher, W. (1995), “Multiple Comparisons in Drug Clinical Trials and Preclinical Assays: A Priori Ordered Hypotheses,” in Biometrie in der Chemisch-Pharmazeutischen Industrie, Vol. 6, ed. J. Vollman, Stuttgart: Fischer-Verlag, 3-18.
21. Naik, U. D. (1975), “Some Selection Rules for Comparing p Processes With a Standard,” Communications in Statistics, Part A-Theory and Methods, 4, 519-535.
22. Neuhauser, M., and Hothorn, L. A. (1997), “The Control of the Consumer Risk in the Ames Assay,” Drug Information Journal, 31, 363-367.
23. Ruberg, S. J. (1989), “Contrasts for Identifying the Minimum Effective Dose,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 816-822.
24. Ruberg, S. J. (1995), “Dose-Response Studies II. Analysis and Interpretation,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 5, 15-42.
25. Stallard, N., and Whitehead, A. (1996), “An Alternative Approach to the Analysis of Animal Carcinogenicity Studies,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 23, 244-248.
26. Stefansson, G., Kim, W., and Hsu, J. C. (1988), “On Confidence Sets in Multiple Comparisons,” in Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics IV, Vol. 2, eds. S. S. Gupta and J. O. Berger, New York: SpringerVerlag, 89-104.
27. Tamhane, A. C., Hochberg, Y., and Dunnett, C. W. (1996), “Multiple Test Procedures for Dose Finding,” Biometrics, 52, 21-37.
28. Williams, D. A. (1971), “A Test for Differences Between Treatment Means When Several Doses are Compared With a Zero Dose,” Biometrics, 27, 103-117.