On δ-equivalence with the best in k-sample models

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 101, Issue 474, 2006, Pages 737-746

  Finner, H ^a   Strassburger, K ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bioequivalence; Equivalence with the best; Formal closure principle; Multiple comparisons; Multiple comparisons with control; Multiple comparisons with the best; Sample size determination; Strong partitioning principle; Subset selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745656461     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1198/016214505000001014     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bechhofer, R. E. (1954), "A Single-Sample Multiple Decision Procedure for Ranking Means of Normal Populations With Known Variances," The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25, 16-39.
2. Berger, R. L., and Hsu, J. C. (1996), "Bioequivalence Trials, Intersection-Union Tests and Equivalence Confidence Sets," Statistical Science, 11, 283-319.
3. Bofinger, E., Hayter, A. J., and Liu, W. (1993), "The Construction of Upper Confidence Bounds on the Range of Several Location Parameters." Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 906-911.
4. Bofinger, E., and Mengersen, K. (1993). "An Upper Bound on a Ratio of Variances," Communications in Statistics, Part A-Theory and Methods, 22, 1907-1922.
5. Broström, G. (1981), "On Sequentially Rejective Subset Selection Procedures." Communications in Statistics, Part A-Theory and Methods, 10, 203-221.
6. Brown, L., Hwang, J. T. G., and Munk, A. (1997), "An Unbiased Test for the Bioequivalence Problem." The Annals of Statistics, 26, 2346-2367.
7. Desu, M. M. (1970), "A Selection Problem." The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41, 1596-1603.
8. Dunnett, C. W., and Tamhane, A. C. (1992), "A Step-Up Multiple Test Procedure," Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 162-170.
9. Edwards, D. G., and Hsu, J. C. (1983), "Multiple Comparisons With the Best Treatment," Journal of the American Statistical Association. 78, 966-971; Corr. 79, 995.
10. Finner, H., and Giani, G. (1994), "Closed Subset Selection Procedures for Selecting Good Populations," Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 38. 179-200.
11. _ (1996), "Duality Between Multiple Testing and Selecting," Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 64, 201-227.
12. Finner, H., and Strassburger, K. (2002). "The Partitioning Principle: A Powerful Tool in Multipje Decision Theory," The Annals of Statistics. 30, 1194-1213.
13. Giani, G., and Finner, H. (1991). "Some General Results on Least Favorable Configurations With Special Reference to Equivalence Testing and the Range Statistic," Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 28, 33-47.
14. Giani, G., and Strassburger, K. (2000), "Multiple Comparison Procedures for Optimally Discriminating Between Good, Equivalent, and Bad Treatments With Respect to a Control." Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 83, 413-440.
15. Grabert, M., Schweiggert, F., and Holl, R. W. (2002), "A Framework for Diabetes Documentation and Quality Management in Germany: 10 Years of Experience With DPV." Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 69, 115-121.
16. Gutmann, S., and Maymin, Z. (1987). "Is the Selected Population the Best?" The Annals of Statistics, 15, 456-461.
17. Hayter, A. J., and Hsu, J. C. (1994), "On the Relationship Between Stepwise Decision Procedures and Confidence Sets," Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 128-136.
18. Horrace, W. C., and Schmidt, P. (2000), "Multiple Comparisons With the Best. With Economic Applications," Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 1-26.
19. Hsu, J. C. (1984a), "Constrained Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Multiple Comparisons With the Best," The Annals of Statistics, 12, 1136-1144.
20. _ (1984b), "Ranking and Selection and Multiple Comparisons With the Best," in Design of Experiments, Ranking and Selection: Essays in Honor of R. E. Bechhofer, eds. T. J. Santner and T. C. Tamhane, Statistics: A Series of Texbooks and Monograph, Vol. 56, pp. 23-33.
21. _ (1992), "Stepwise Multiple Comparisons With the Best," Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 33, 197-204.
22. _ (1996), Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods. London: Chapman & Hall.
23. Hsu, J. C., and Berger, R. L. (1999), "Stepwise Confidence Intervals Without Multiplicity Adjustment for Dose-Response and Toxicity Studies," Journal of the American Statistical Association. 94, 468-482.
24. Kim, W.-C. (.1988), "On Detecting the Best Treatment," Journal of the Korean Statistical Society: 17, 82-92.
25. Marcus, R., Peritz, E., and Gabriel, K. R. (1976), "On Closed Testing Procedures With Special Reference to Ordered Analysis of Variance." Biometrika. 63, 655-660.
26. Naik, U. D. (1977), "Some Subset Selection Problems." Communications in Statistics, Part A-Theory and Methods, 6, 955-966.
27. Nakayama, M. K. (1997), "Multiple-Comparison Procedures for Steady-State Simulations," The Annals of Statistics, 25, 2433-2450.
28. Sarkar, S. S. (2000), "A Note on the Monotonicity of the Critical Values of a Step-Up Test," Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 87, 241-249.
29. Saville, D. J., and Wood, G. R. (1991). Statistical Methods: The Geometric Approach, New York: Springer-Verlag.
30. Shorack, G. P., and Wellner, J. A. (1986). Empirical Processes With Applications to Statistics, New York: Wiley.
31. Stefansson, G., Kim, W.-C., and Hsu, J. C. (1988), "On Confidence Sets in Multiple Comparisons." in Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics, Vol. IV, eds. S. S. Gupta and J. O. Berger, New York: Academic Press, pp. 89-104.
32. Swisher, J. R., and Jacobson, S. H. (1999). "A Survey of Ranking, Selection, and Multiple Comparison Procedures for Discrete-Event Simulation," in Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Winter Simulation: Simulation-A Bridge to the Future, Vol. 1. eds. P. A, Farrington et al., New York: ACM Press, pp. 492-501.