An examination of the use of monographs in the communication journal literature

Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 39-51

  Yates, Steven D ^a,b   Chapman, Karen ^b  

^a IMLS ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Monograph; Reference study; Scholarly communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 36549079093     PISSN: 01639269     EISSN: 15444546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J103v26n01_03     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. American Council of Learned Societies. 1979. Scholarly Communication: The report of the national enquiry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Borgman, Christine L. and William Paisley, eds. 1989. Bibliometrics and scholarly communication. Communication Research 16 (5).
3. Bowman, Michael. 1991. Format citation patterns and their implications for collection development in research libraries. Collection Building 11 (1): 2-8.
4. Cullars, John M. 1998. Citation, characteristics of English-language monographs in philosophy. Library and Information Science Quarterly 20 (1): 41-68.
5. Georgas, Helen and John Cullars. 2005. A citation study of the characteristics of the linguistics literature. College & Research Libraries 66 (6): 496-515.
6. Hérabel, Jean-Pierre V. M. and Anne L. Buchanan. 1994. Citation studies in the humanities and social sciences: A selective and annotated bibliography. Collection Management 18 (3/4): 89-137.
7. Knievel, Jennifer E. and Charlene Kellsey. 2005. Citation, analysis for collection development: A comparative study of eight humanities fields. The Library Quarterly 75 (2): 142-168.
8. Koch, Jean E. 1979. A citation analysis for business communication. Journal of Business Communication 16 (4): 45-56.
9. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Ylva and Julian Warner. 1996. The role of monographs in scholarly communication: An empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics. Journal of Documentation 52 (4): 389-404.
10. Line, Maurice B. 1981. The structure of social science literature as shown by a large-scale citation analysis. Social Science Information Studies 1: 67-87.
11. McGinty, Stephen. 1989. Political science publishers: What do the citations reveal? Collection Management 11 (3/4): 93-101.
12. Pasadeos, Yorgo, Arnold Barban, Huiuk Yi and Bong-Hyun. Kim. 1997. A 30-year assessment of the media planning literature. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 19 (1): 23-36.
13. Pasadeos, Yorgo and Bruce Renfro. 1992. A bibliometric analysis of public relations research. Journal of Public Relations Research 4 (3): 167-187.
14. Social Science Citation Index, Journal Citation Reports, Printed Guide to the Microfiche Edition of the SSCI JCR. Annual editions, 1999-2004. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.
15. Thatcher, Sanford G. 1997. Thinking systematically about the crisis in scholarly communication. In The Specialized Scholarly Monograph in Crisis or How Can I Get Tenure if You Won't Publish My Book September 11-12, 1997[online] by the American Association of University Presses [Accessed 23 January 2006]. Available from 〈http://www.arl.org/scomm/epub/papers/ thatcher.html〉.
16. Thompson, Jennifer Wolfe. 2002. The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in literary scholarship. Libri 52 (3): 121-136.
17. Torrey, Kate. 1997. Welcome and introduction. In The Specialized Scholarly Monograph in Crisis or How Can I Get Tenure if You Won't Publish My Book September 11-12, 1997 [online] by the American Association of University Presses [Accessed 23 January 2006]. Available from 〈http://www.arl.org/scomm/epub/papers/torrey.html〉.