Understanding height-structured competition in forests: Is there an R* for light? (Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B - Biological Sciences (2007) 274, (3039-3047) DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0891);Understanding height-structured competition in forests: Is there an R* for liaht?

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 274, Issue 1628, 2007, Pages 3039-3048

  Adams, Thomas P ^a,b   Purves, Drew W ^a,c   Pacala, Stephen W ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Community ecology; Forest dynamics; Pairwise invasibility; SORTIE; Succession

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; BIOMECHANICS; COEXISTENCE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); FECUNDITY; FOREST DYNAMICS; GROWTH; INVASIBILITY; LIFE CYCLE; LIFE HISTORY; MORTALITY; SUCCESSION;

ALLOMETRY; ARTICLE; CANOPY; COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; COMPETITION; FERTILITY; FOREST DYNAMICS; FOREST STRUCTURE; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; MONOCULTURE; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT HEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

EID: 36549061496     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1562     Document Type: Erratum

References (44)

1. Aarssen, L. W. & Keogh, T. 2002 Conundrums of competitive ability in plants: what to measure? Oikos 96, 531-542. (doi:10.1034/j.1600- 0706.2002.960314.x)
2. Adams, T. P. 2006 Dynamics of temperate US forests: monocultures and invasion dynamics. Master's thesis, University of York, UK.
3. Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. 1991 Infectious diseases of humans: dynamics and control. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Busing, R. T. & Mailly, D. 2002 Advances in spatial, individual-based modelling of forest dynamics. J. Veg. Sci. 15, 831-842. (doi:10.1658/1100-9233(2004)015 [0831:AISIMO]2.0.CO;2)
5. Canham, C. D., Finzi, A. C., Pacala, S. W. & Burbank, D. H. 1994 Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests: interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees. Can. J. Forest Res. 24, 337-349.
6. Chesson, P. 2000 Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343-366. (doi:10. 1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1. 343)
7. Coates, K. D., Canham, C. D., Beaudet, M., Sachs, D. L. & Messier, C. 2003 Use of a spatially explicit individual-tree model (SORTIE/BC) to explore the implications of patchiness in structurally complex forests. Forest Ecol. Manage. 186, 297-310. (doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(03) 00301-3)
8. Chesson, P. L. & Ellner, S. 1989 Invasability and stochastic boundedness in monotonic competition models. J. Math. Biol. 27, 117-138.
9. Craine, J. M. & Reich, P. B. 2005 Leaf-level light compensation points in shade-tolerant woody seedings. New Phyto. 166, 710-713. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137. 2005.01420.x)
10. Dalling, J. W. & Hubbell, S. P. 2002 Seed size, growth rate and gap microsite conditions as determinants of recruitment success for pioneer species. J. Ecol. 90, 557-568. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00695.x)
11. Deutschman, D. H., Levin, S. A. & Pacala, S. W. 1999 Error propagation in a forest succession model: the role of fine-scale heterogeneity in light. Ecology 80, 1927-1943.
12. Gilbert, B., Wright, S. J., Muller-Landau, H. C., Kitajima, K. & Hernandez, A. 2006 Life history trade-offs in tropical trees and lianas. Ecology 87, 1281-1288. (doi:10.1890/ 0012-9658(2006)87[1281: LHTITT]2.0.CO;2)
13. Grime, J. P. 1979 Plant strategies and vegetation processes. New York, NY: Wiley.
14. Hubbell, S. P. 2001 The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Kohyama, T. 1993 Size-structured tree populations in gap-dynamic forest-the forest architecture hypothesis for the stable coexistence of species. J. Ecol. 81, 131-143. (doi:10. 2307/2261230)
16. Kohyama, T. 1994 Size-structure-based models of forest dynamics to interpret population- and community-level mechanisms. J. Plant Res. 107, 107-116. (doi:10.1007/ BF02344537)
17. Kohyama, T., Suzuki, E., Partomihardjot, T., Yamada, T. & Kubo, T. 2003 Tree species differentiation in growth, recruitment and allometry in relation to maximum height in a Bornean mixed dipterocarp forest. J. Ecol. 91, 797-806. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00810.x)
18. Levins, R. 1969 Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 12, 237-240.
19. Loehle, C. 1998 Height growth rate tradeoffs determine northern and southern range limits for trees. J. Biogeogr. 25, 735-742. (doi.10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.2540735.x)
20. Loehle, C. 2000 Strategy space and the disturbance spectrum: a life-history model for tree species co-existence. Am. Nat. 156, 14-33. (doi:10.1086/303369)
21. Nakashizuka, T. & Kohyama, T. 1995 The significance of the asymmetric effect of crowding for coexistence in a mixed temperate forest. J. Veg. Sci. 6, 509-516. (doi:10.2307/ 3236349)
22. Niinemets, U. & Valladares, F. 2006 Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate Northern Hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecol. Monogr. 76, 521-547. (doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076[0521:TTSDAW]2.0. CO;2)
23. Nishimura, N., Hara, T., Kawatani, M., Hoshino, D. & Yamamoto, S.-I. 2005 Promotion of species coexistence in old-growth coniferous forest through interplay of life-history strategy and tree competition. J. Veg. Sci. 16, 549-558. (doi:10.1658/1100-9233(2005)16[549:POSCIO] 2.0.CO;2)
24. Oliver, C. D. & Larson, B. C. 1996 Forest stand dynamics. New York, NY: Wiley.
25. Pacala, S. W. & Rees, M. 1998 Models suggesting field experiments to test two hypotheses explaining successional diversity. Am. Nat. 152, 729-737. (doi:10.1086/ 286203)
26. Pacala, S. W., Canham, C. D. & Silander, J. A. 1993 Forest models defined by field measurements. 1. The design of a Northeastern forest simulator. Can. J. Forest. Res. 23, 1980-1988. (doi:10.1139/x93-249)
27. Pacala, S. W., Canham, C. D., Saponara, J., Silander, J. A., Kobe, R. K. & Ribbens, E. 1996 Forest models defined by field measurements: estimation, error analysis and dynamics. Ecol. Monogr. 66, 1-43. (doi:10.2307/2963479)
28. Pelissier, R., Dray, S. & Sabatier, D. 2002 Within-plot relationships between tree species occurrences and hydrological soil constraints: an example in French Guiana investigated through canonical correlation analysis. Plant Ecol. 162, 143-156. (doi:10.1023/ A:1020399603500)
29. Perry, L. G., Neuhauser, C. & Galatowitsch, S. M. 2003 Founder control and coexistence in a simple model of asymmetric competition for light. J. Theor. Biol. 222, 425-436.
30. Phillips, O. L., Vargas, P. N., Monteeagudo, A. L., Cruz, A. P., Zans, M.-E. C., Sánchez, W. G., Yli-Halla, M. & Rose, S. 2003 Habitat association among Amazonian tree species: a landscape-scale approach. J. Ecol. 91, 757-775. (doi:10. 1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00815.x)
31. Poorter, L. & Arets, E. J. M. M. 2003 Light environment and tree strategies in a Bolivian moist forest: an evaluation of the light partitioning hypothesis. Plant Ecol. 166, 295-306. (doi:10.1023/A: 1023295806147)
32. Poorter, L. & Bongers, F. 2006 Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species. Ecology 87, 1733-1743. (doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1733: LTAGPO]2.0.CO;2)
33. Poorter, L., Bongers, L. & Bongers, F. 2006 Architecture of 54 moist-forest tree species: traits, trade-offs, and functional groups. Ecology 87, 1289-1301. (doi:10.1890/ 0012-9658(2006)87[1289: AOMTST]2.0.CO;2)
34. Purves, D. W., Pacala, S. W. & Lichstein, J. W. 2007 Crown shape, canopy structure and competition: a parameterised individual-based model for 250 species. PLoS ONE 2, e870. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000870)
35. Strigul, N., Pristinski, D., Purves, D. W., Dushoff, J. & Pacala, S. W. Submitted. Crown plasticity and large-scale forest dynamics: a new method of modelling vegetation dynamics.
36. Tilman, D. 1980 Resources: a graphical-mechanistic approach to competition and predation. Am. Nat. 116, 362-393. (doi:10.1086/283633)
37. Tilman, D. 1982 Resource competition and community structure. Monographs in population biology, vol. 17. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Tilman, D. 1985 The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. Am. Nat. 125, 827-852. (doi:10.1086/ 284382)
39. Tilman, D. & Wedin, D. 1991 Dynamics of nitrogen competition between successional grasses. Ecology 72, 1038-1049. (doi:10.2307/1940604)
40. Tuvelli, M. 1978 Does environmental variability limit niche overlap. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 75, 5085-5089.
41. Vance, R. R. & Nevai, A. L. 2007 Plant population growth and competition in a light gradient: a mathematical model of canopy partitioning. J. Theor. Biol. 245, 210-219. (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.10.015)
42. Vojtech, E., Turnbull, L. A. & Hector, A. 2007 Differences in light interception in grass monocultures predict short-term competitive outcomes under productive conditions. PLoS ONE 2, e499. (doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0000499)
43. Von Foerster, H. 1959 Some remarks on changing populations. In The kinetics of cellular proliferation (ed. F. Stohlman), pp. 382-407. New York, NY; London, UK: Grune & Stratton.
44. Woodward, F. I. 1987 Climate and plant distribution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.