Technological learning in energy-environment-economy modelling: A survey

Energy Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 138-162

  Kahouli Brahmi, Sondes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Energy environment economy modelling; Learning curve; Technological learning

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

ENERGY-ENVIRONMENT-ECONOMY MODELLING; LEARNING CURVE; TECHNOLOGICAL LEARNING;

ENERGY POLICY;

BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; ENERGY MARKET; ENERGY PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ESTIMATION METHOD; LEARNING; NUMERICAL MODEL; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION; TOP-DOWN APPROACH;

EID: 36549012631     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Abell D.F., and Hammond J.S. Cost dynamics: scale and experience effects. Strategic Planning: Problems and Analytical Approaches (1979), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
2. Argote L., and Epple D. Learning curve in manufacturing. Science 247 (1990) 920-924
3. Arrow K. The economic implication of learning-by-doing. Review of Economic Studies 29 (1962) 155-173
4. Barker T., Pan H., Köhler J., Warren R., and Winne S. Decarbonizing the global economy with induced technological change: scenarios to 2100 using E3MG. The Energy Journal, Endogenous Technological Change (2006) 241-258
5. Barreto, L., 2001. Technological learning in energy optimisation models and deployment of emerging technologies. Doctorate Thesis in Technical Science. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, 276pp.
6. Barreto L., and Klaassen G. Emission trading and the role of learning-by-doing spillovers in the bottom-up energy system ERIS model. Energy Technology and Policy 2 1/2 (2004) 70-95
7. Barreto L., and Kypreos S. Endogenizing R&D and market experience in the bottom-up energy systems ERIS model. Technovation 24 (2004) 615-629
8. BCG (Boston Consulting Group), 1968. Prospectives on Experience. Boston, MA.
9. Berndt E.R. The Practice of Econometrics: Classical and Contemporary (1991), Addison-Wesley Publishing Co
10. Blackwood, D., 1997. Eastern Trough Area Project (ETAP), Engineer, June, p. 4.
11. Bodde D. Riding the experience curve. Technology Review 79 (1976) 53-58
12. Bosetti V., Carraro C., and Galeotti M. The dynamics of carbon and energy intensity in a model of endogenous technical change. The Energy Journal, Endogenous Technological Change (2006) 191-205
13. Buonanno P., Carraro C., and Galeotti M. Endogenous technical change and the costs of Kyoto. Resource and Energy Economics 25 (2003) 11-34
14. Carraro C., and Galeotti M. Economic growth, international competitiveness and environmental protection: R&D and innovation strategies with WARM model. Energy Economics 19 (1997) 2-28
15. Castelnuovo E., Galeotti M., Gambarelli G., and Vergalli S. Learning-by-doing vs learning-by-searching in a model of climate change policy analysis. Ecological Economics 54 (2005) 261-276
16. CEC (California Energy Commission), 1997. Wind project performance. 1995 Summary Staff Report, June.
17. Claeson, U., 1999. Experience curves for policy making: the case of energy technologies. Proceedings of the IEA International Workshop, Stuttgart, Germany.
18. Cohen W., and Levinthal D. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 99 Septembre (1989) 569-596
19. Coulomb, L., Neuhoff, K., 2006. Learning curves and changing product attributes: the case of wind turbines. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics (CWPE) No. 0618 and Electricity Policy Research Group Working Paper (EPRG) No. 0601, Cambridge.
20. Crassous R., Hourcade J.C., and Sassi O. Endogenous structural change and climate targets in the exploration and extraction sector of fossil fuels. Energy Journal, Endogenous Technological Change (2006) 259-276
21. Criqui, P., Bourgeois, B., Cattier, F., De Almeida, E., Menanteau, P., Mima, S., 1998. Endogenous technical change, A tutorial. Workshop on Modelling Technological Learning. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.
22. Dannemand Andersen, P., Fuglsang, P., 1996. Vurdering af udviklingsforlob for vindkraftteknologien (Estimation of the future advances of wind power technology). Roskilde, Denmark, Forskningscenter Riso.
23. Durstewitz, M., Hoppe-Kilpper, M., 1999. Experiences curves for policy making: the case of energy technologies. IEA International Workshop, Stuttgart, Germany.
24. Edenhofer O., Lessmann K., and Bauer N. Mitigation strategies and costs of climate protection: the effects of ETC in the hybrid model MIND. Energy Journal, Endogenous Technological Change (2006) 207-222
25. Fisher J.C. Energy Crises in Perspective (1974), Wiley, New York, USA
26. Garud R. On the distinction between know-how, know-why and know-what. Advances in Srategic Mnagement 14 (1997) 81-101
27. Gerlagh R., and van der Zwaan B. Gross world product and consumption in a global warming model with endogenous technological change. Resource and Energy Eonomics 25 (2003) 35-57
28. Goldemberg J.C. The evolution of ethanol costs in Brazil. Energy Policy 24 12 (1996) 1127-1128
29. 2 abatement in the presence of induced technological change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39 (2000) 1-38
30. Griliches Z. Production functions in manufacturing: some preliminary results. In: Brown M. (Ed). The Theory and Empirical Analysis of Production (1967), Columbia University Press, New York 275-322
31. Griliches Z., and Ringstad V. Economies of Scale and the Form of the Production Function (1971), North-Holland, Amsterdam
32. Gritsevskyi A., and Nakicenovic N. Modelling uncertainty of induced technological change. Energy Policy 28 (2000) 907-921
33. Grübler A., and Messner S. Technological change and the timing of mitigation measures. Energy Economics 20 (1998) 495-512
34. Grübler A., Nakicenovic N., and Victor D.G. Dynamics of energy technologies and global change. Energy Policy 27 5 (1999) 247-280
35. Grübler, A., Nakicenovic, N., Nordhaus, W. D., 2002. Technological Change and the Environment. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
36. Habermeier K. Product use and product improvement. Research Policy 19 (1990) 271-283
37. Harmon, C., 2000. Experience curves of photovoltaic technology. Interim Report/IR-00-014. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.
38. Hedenus F., Azar C., and Lindgren K. Induced technological change in limited foresight optimization model. The Energy Journal, Endogenous Technological Change (2006) 109-122
39. Ibenholt K. Explaining learning curves for wind power. Energy Policy 30 13 (2002) 1181-1189
40. Isoard S., and Soria A. Technical change dynamics: evidence from the emerging renewable energy technologies. Energy Economics 23 (2001) 619-636
41. Jamasb, T., 2006. Technological change theory and learning curves: progress and patterns in energy technologies. EPRG Winter Research Seminar, University of Cambridge.
42. Jaskow P.L., and Rose N.L. The effect of technological change, experience and environmental regulation on the construction cost of coal-burning generating units. Rand Journal of Economics 16 (1985) 1-23
43. Junginger M., Faaij A., and Turkenburg W. Global experience curves for wind farms. Energy Policy 33 (2005) 133-150
44. Junginger M., Visser E., Gregersen K., Koornneef J., Raven R., Faaij A., and Turkenburg W. Technological learning in bioenergy systems. Energy Policy 34 18 (2006) 4024-4041
45. Kamp, L., 2002. Learning in wind turbine development. A comparison between the Netherlands and Denmark, 244pp.
46. Klaassen G., Miketa A., Larsen K., and Sundqvist T. The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics 54 (2005) 227-240
47. Kobos P., Erickson J., and Drennen T. Technological learning and renewable energy costs: implications for US renewable energy policy. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 1645-1658
48. Köhler J., Grubb M., Popp D., and Edenhofer O. The transition to endogenous technical change in climate-economy models: a technical overview to the innovation modelling comparison project. The Energy Journal, Endogenous Technological Change (2006) 17-55
49. Kouvaritakis N., Soria A., and Isoard S. Modelling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptative expectations model with learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 14 1-4 (2000) 104-115
50. Kouvaritakis N., Soria A., and Isoard S. Endogenous learning in world post-Kyoto scenarios: application of the POLES model under adaptative expectations. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 14 1-4 (2000) 222-248
51. Kypreos S., and Bahn O. A MERGE model with endogenous technological progress. Environmental Modelling: An Assessment 8 3 (2003) 249-259
52. Lieberman M.B. The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. Rand Journal of Economics 15 (1984) 213-228
53. Loiter J.M., and Norberg-Bohm V. Technology policy and renewable energy: public roles in the development of new energy technologies. Energy Policy 27 (1999) 85-97
54. Löschel A. Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: a survey. Ecological Economics 43 (2002) 105-126
55. Lund, P.D., 1995. An improved market penetration model for wind energy technology. EWEA Special Topic Conference. The Economics of Wind, Finland.
56. Lundvall B.A. Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., and Soete L. (Eds). Technical Change and Economic Theory (1988), Pinter, London, UK 349-369
57. 2 abatement. Energy Economics 26 (2004) 603-619
58. Mattsson N. Internalizing Technological Development in Energy Systems Models (1997), Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
59. Mattsson, N., 1998. GENIE: an energy system model with uncertain learning. Proceedings of the IEA ETSAP/Annex VI 5th Workshop, Berlin, Germany, 5-7 May 1998. ECN, Petten, The Netherlands.
60. Mattsson N., and Wene C.O. Assessing new energy technologies using an energy system model with endogenized experience curves. International Journal of Energy Research 21 (1997) 255-261
61. Maycock, P.D., Wakefield, G.F., 1975. Business Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic Energy Conversion. Dallas, TX.
62. Mackay R.M., and Probert S.D. Likely market-penetrations of renewable energy technologies. Applied Energy 59 1 (1998) 1-38
63. McDonald A., and Schrattenholzer L. Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29 4 (2001) 255-261
64. MacGregor P.R., Maslak C.E., and Stoll H.G. The Market Outlook for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Technology (1991), General Electric Company, New York
65. Messner S. Endogenized technological learning in an energy systems model. Evolutionary Economics 7 (1997) 291-313
66. Messner, S., Schrattenholzer, L., 1998. Experience from including technology progress dynamics into the global optimization model MESSAGE. ECS Contribution to the Mid-Term Assessment Report of the TEEM Project. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.
67. Miketa A., and Schrattenholzer L. Experiments with a methodology to model the role of R&D expenditures in energy technology learning processes: first results. Energy Policy 32 (2004) 1679-1692
68. Milborrow, D., 2002. Personal communication on British wind farm investment cost. Technical consultant. Windpower monthly.
69. Moroney J. Cobb-Douglas production functions and returns to scale in US manufacturing industry. Western Economic Journal VI (1967) 39-51
70. Nakicenovic N., Grübler A., and MacDonald A. Global Energy Perspectives (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
71. Neij L. Use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 23 13 (1997) 1099-1107
72. Neij L. Cost dynamics of wind power. Energy 24 (1999) 375-389
73. Neij, L., Dannemand, P., Durstewitz, M., Helby, P., Hoppe-Kilpper, M., Morthorst, P.E., 2003. Experience curves a tool for energy policy programmes assessment. Final Report of EXTOOL, IMES/EESS Report No. 40.
74. Nerlove M. Returns to scale in electricity supply. In: Christ C.F. (Ed). Measurement in Economics: Studies in Honor of Yehuda Grunfeld (1963), Stanford University Press 167-198
75. Nitsch, J., 1998. Probleme der langfriskostenschätzung-Beispiel regenerative energien, Vortrag beim workshop "Energiesparen-klimaschutz der sich rechnet", Rotenburg an der fulda.
76. Nordhaus W.D., and Yang Z. A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate change strategies. American Economic Review 4 (1996) 741-765
77. Papineau M. An economic perspective on experience curves and dynamic economies in renewable energy technologies. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 422-432
78. Rabitsch, H., 1999. Electricity transmission networks in Eurasia. Unpublished data.
79. Rao S., Keppo I., and Riahi K. Importance of technological change and spillovers in long term climate policy. The Energy Journal, Endogenous Technological Change (2006) 123-139
80. Rosenberg N. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (1986), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
81. Sagar A., and Zwaan B. Technological innovation in the energy sector: R&D, deployment and learning-by-doing. Energy Policy 34 17 (2006) 2601-2608
82. 2 stabilizations and effects of technological changes. The Energy Journal, Endogenous Technological Change (2006) 141-161
83. Schrattenholzer, L., 1998. Analysis of past learning rates; ECS contribution to the progress report TEEM. Draft. Proceedings of the Workshop on Technology Improvement Dynamics, IPTA, Seville.
84. Seebregts A., Kram T., Schaeffer G.J., and Bos A. Endogenous learning and technology clustering: analysis with MARKAL model of the Western European energy system. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 14 1-4 (2000) 289-319
85. Seebregts, A., kram, T., Schaeffer, G.J., Stoffer, A., kypreos, S., Barreto, L., Messner, S., Schrattenholzer, L., 1999. Endogenous technological change in energy system models: synthesis of experience with ERIS, MARKAL and MESSAGE. ECN-C--99-025, PSI, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.
86. Sierksma G. Linear and Integer Programming: Theory and Practice (1996), Dekker, New York
87. Söderholm P., and Klaassen G. Wind power in Europe: a simultaneous innovation-diffusion model. Environmental and resource economics 36 (2007) 163-190
88. Söderholm P., and Sundqvist T. Empirical challenges in the use of learning curves for assessing the economic prospects of renewable energy technologies. Renewable energy (2007) 10.1016/j.renene.2006.12.007
89. Sijm J.P.M. Induced Technological Change and Spillovers in Climate Policy Modelling (2004), ECN, Netherlands
90. Taillant, P., 2005. L'analyse évolutionniste des innovations technologiques: l'exemple des énergies solaire photovoltaïque et éolienne. Thèse de doctorat en économie politique et politiques industrielles. Université de Montpellier I, France.
91. Utterback J.M. Mastering the Dynamic of Innovation (1994), Harvard Business School Press
92. Van der Zwaan B., Gerlagh R., klaassen G., and Schrattenholzer L. Endogenous technological change in climate change modelling. Energy Economics 24 1 (2002) 1-19
93. Walters A.A. Production and cost function: an econometric survey. Econometrica 31 (1963) 1-66
94. Watanabe C., Wakabayashi K., and Miyazawa T. Industrial dynamism and the creation of virtuous cycle between R&D, market growth and price reduction: the case of photovoltaic power generation (PV) development in Japan. Technovation 20 (2000) 299-312
95. Wene, C.O., 2000. Experience curves for energy technology policy. ISBN:92-64-17650-0, International energy agency (IEA)/OCDE, Paris, France.
96. Williams, R.H., Terzian, G., 1993. A benefit/cost analysis of accelerated development of photovoltaic technology. Report No. 281, Princeton University, NJ, USA.
97. Wing I.S. Representing induced technological change in models for climate policy analysis. Energy Economics 28 (2006) 539-562
98. Wright T.P. Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of the Aeronautical Science 3 (1936) 122-128
99. 2 mitigation strategies. Journal of Hazardous Materials 61 (1998) 217-227
100. Zhao, J., 1999. The diffusion and costs of natural gas infrastructures. Unpublished data.