A MERGE model with endogenous technological progress

Environmental Modeling and Assessment

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 249-259

  Kypreos, S ^a   Bahn, O ^a  

^a PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Endogenous technological change; Global climate change mitigation policies; MERGE

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE MODELS; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; MERGING;

BASIC FORMULATION; ENDOGENOUS TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; ENDOGENOUS TECHNOLOGICAL LEARNING; ENDOGENOUS TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS; ENERGY SYSTEMS; GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGES; NUMERICAL RESULTS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE MODELING; GLOBAL CLIMATE; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 0041876041     PISSN: 14202026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025551408939     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. L. Barreto and S. Kypreos, A post-Kyoto analysis with the ERIS model prototype, Int. J. Global Energy Issues 14 (2000) 262-280.
2. L. Barreto and S. Kypreos, Technological learning in energy models: Experience and scenario analysis with MARKAL and the ERIS model prototype, PSI Bericht Nr 99-08, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland (1999).
3. C. Capros and L. Mantzos, Endogenous learning in European post-Kyoto scenarios: Results from applying the market equilibrium model PRIMES, Int. J. Global Energy Issues 14 (2000) 249-261.
4. L. Christiansson, Diffusion and learning curves of renewable energy technologies, WP-95-126, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxemburg, Austria (1995).
5. P. Criqui et al., POLES 2.2, EUR 17538 EN, European Commission DG XII, Brussels (1996).
6. European Commission, The PRIMES project, EUR 16713 EN, DG XI, Brussels (1995).
7. L.G. Fishbone and H. Abilock, MARKAL, a linear-programming model for energy systems analysis: Technical description of the BNL version, Int. J. of Energy Research 5 (1981) 353-375.
8. P. Freund, Abatement and mitigation of carbon dioxide emissions from power generation, in: Proceedings Power-Generation 1998 Conference, Milan, Italy.
9. A. Grübler, Technology and Global Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).
10. N. Kouvaritakis, P. Criqui and C. Thonet, World post-Kyoto scenarios: Benefits from accelerated technology progress, Int. J. Global Energy Issues 14 (2000) 184-203.
11. S. Kypreos, The MERGE model with endogenous technological change, in: Proceedings of the Economic Modelling of Environmental Policy and Endogenous Technological Change Workshop (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000).
12. A.S. Manne, R. Mendelsohn and R.G. Richels, MERGE: A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies, Energy Policy 23 (1995) 17-34.
13. 2 Emission Limits (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1992).
14. N. Mattsson and C.O. Wene, Assessing new energy technologies using an energy system model with endogenized experience curves, Int. J. Energy Research 21 (1997) 385-393.
15. S. Messner, Endogenised technological learning in an energy systems model, J. Evolutionary Economics 7 (1997) 291-313.
16. B.A. Murtagh and M.A. Saunders, MINOS 5.4 User's Guide, SOL 83-20R (Stanford University, Stanford, 1995).
17. T. Negishi, General Equilibrium Theory and International Trade (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1972).
18. United Nations, Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Conference of the Parties, FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1 (1997).