Wind power in Europe: A simultaneous innovation-diffusion model

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 163-190

  Söderholm, Patrik ^a   Klaassen, Ger ^b  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b EUROPEAN COMMISSION   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Europe; Innovation; Learning curve; Policy; Technology diffusion; Wind power

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; PUBLIC POLICY; TAXATION; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; WIND POWER;

CETERIS PARIBUS; INNOVATION DIFFUSION MODEL; TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING;

INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT; INNOVATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; POWER GENERATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION; WIND POWER;

CENTRAL EUROPE; DENMARK; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33846881971     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-006-9025-z     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Baltagi B. H. (1995). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. John Wiley & Sons, New York
2. Barreto L., Kypreos S. (2004). "Endogenizing R&D and Market Experience in the 'Bottom-up' Energy-systems ERIS Model". Technovation 24:615-629
3. Bergek, A. (2002), 'Shaping and Exploiting Technological Opportunities: The Case of Renewable Energy Technology in Sweden', Ph.D. Dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
4. Berndt E. R. (1991). The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts
5. Buen, J. (2006), 'Danish and Norwegian Wind Industry: The Relationship Between Policy Instruments, Innovation and Diffusion', Energy Policy (forthcoming)
6. Coe D. T., Helpman E. (1995). "International R&D Spillovers". European Economic Review 39:859-887
7. Durstewitz, M. (2000), Personal communication, Institut für Solare Energieversorgungs-technik (ISET), 5 October 2000
8. Ek, K., and P. Söderholm (2005), 'Technology Diffusion and Learning in the European Wind Power Sector: An Econometric Analysis', in K. Ek, ed., The Economics of Renewable Energy Support, Ph.D. Dissertation, Economics Unit, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden
9. García-Cebrián L. I. (2002). The Influence of Subsidies on the Production Process: The Case of Wind Energy in Spain. The Electricity Journal 15(4):79-86
10. Griliches Z. (1995). R&D and Productivity: Econometric Results and Measurement Issues. In: Stoneman P. (Eds), Handbook of Economics on Innovation and Technological Change. Blackwell, Oxford
11. Hassett K. A., Metcalf G. E. (1995). Energy Tax Credits and Residential Conservation Investment: Evidence from Panel Data. Journal of Public Economics 57:201-217
12. Hausman J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251-1271
13. Ibenholt K. (2002). Explaining Learning Curves for Wind Power. Energy Policy 30:1181-1189
14. Institute for Solar Energy Technology (ISET) (2002), European Wind Energy Information Network, Kassel, Germany, Internet: http://euwinet.iset.uni-kassel. de
15. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2001). IEA R&D Wind Annual Report. OECD, Paris
16. Isoard S., Soria A. (2001). Technical Change Dynamics: Evidence from the Emerging Renewable Energy Technologies. Energy Economics 23:619-636
17. Jacobsson S., Johnson A. (2000). The Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technology: An Analytical Framework and Key Issues for Research. Energy Policy 28:625-640
18. Jaffe A. B., Stavins R. N. (1994). The Energy Paradox and the Diffusion of Conservation Technology. Resource and Energy Economics 16(2):91-112
19. Jaffe A. B., Stavins R. N. (1995). Dynamic Incentives of Environmental Regulations: The Effects of Alternative Policy Instruments on Technology Diffusion. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29:S43-S63
20. Jaffe A. B., Newell R. G., Stavins R. N. (2002). Environmental Policy and Technological Change. Environmental & Resource Economics 22(1-2):41-69
21. Kemp R. (1997). Environmental Policy and Technical Change: A Comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
22. Klaassen G., Miketa A., Larsen K., Sundqvist T. (2005). "The Impact of R&D on Innovation for Wind Energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom". Ecological Economics 54:227-240
23. Koomey J. G., Sanstad A. H., Shown L. J. (1996). Energy-Efficient Lightning: Market Data, Market Imperfections, and Policy Success. Contemporary Economic Policy 14(3):98-111
24. Lewis J. and R. Wiser (2005), A Review of the International Experiences with Policies to Promote Wind Power Industry Development, Report prepared for Energy Foundation China Sustainable Energy Program. Center for Resource Solutions, San Francisco, USA
25. Lucas R. E. (1976), 'Econometric Policy Evaluations: A Critique', in K. Brunner and A.H. Meltzer, eds., The Phillips Curve and the Labor Market, Amsterdam: North Holland
26. McDonald A., Schrattenholzer L. (2000). Learning Rates for Energy Technologies. Energy Policy 29:255-261
27. McVeigh J., Burtraw D., Darmstadter J., Palmer K. (2000). Winner, loser or Innocent Victim? Has Renewable Energy Performed as Expected?. Solar Energy 68(3):237-255
28. Menanteau P., Finon D., Lamy M-L. (2003). Prices versus Quantities: Choosing Policies for Promoting the Development of Renewable Energy. Energy Policy 31:799-812
29. Meyer N. I. (2003). European Schemes for Promoting Renewables in Liberalised Markets. Energy Policy 31:665-676
30. Milborrow, D. (2000), Personal communication, Technical consultant to Wind Power Monthly, 11 November 2000
31. Mitchell C. (2000). The England and Wales Non-fossil Fuel Obligation: History and Lessons. Annual Review of Energy and Environment 25:285-312
32. Neij L., Dannemand Andersen P., Durstewitz M. (2003). Experience Curves for Wind Power. International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy 2(1-2):15-32
33. Rohrig, K. (2001), Personal communication, Institute for Solar Energy Technology (ISET), Kassel, Germany, 23 January 2001
34. Sayrs, L. W. (1989), Pooled Time Series Analysis, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series No. 70, Sage Publications
35. Schumpeter J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
36. Söderholm P. (2001). Fuel for Thought: European Energy Market Restructuring and the Future of Power Generation Gas Use. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 16(4):313-327
37. Stoneman P. (2002). The Economics of Technological Diffusion. Blackwell, Oxford
38. Sundqvist T., Söderholm P. (2002). Valuing the Environmental Impacts of Electricity Generation: A Critical Survey. Journal of Energy Literature VIII(2):3-41
39. Toke D. (2002). Wind Power in UK and Denmark: Can Rational Choice Help Explain Different Outcomes?. Environmental Politics 11(4): 83-100
40. Varela, M. (2001), Personal communication, CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain, 24 January 2001
41. Wolsink M. (1996). Dutch Wind Power Policy: Stagnating Implementation of Renewables. Energy Policy 24(12):1079-1088