The gap between electoral and liberal democracy revisited. Some conceptual and empirical clarifications

Acta Politica

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 380-400

  Møller, Jørgen ^a  

^a EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36549000867     PISSN: 00016810     EISSN: 17411416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500178     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adcock, R. and Collier, D. (2001) 'Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualititive and quantitative research', American Political Science Review 95: 3.
2. Collier, D. and Levitsky, S. (1997) 'Democracy with adjectives: conceptual innovation in comparative research', World Politics 49(3): 430-451.
3. Coppedge, M. (1999) 'Thickening thin concepts and theories: Combining large N and small in comparative politics', Comparative Politics 31(4): 465-476.
4. Dahl, R.A. (1971) Polyarchy, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
5. Diamond, L. (1999) Developing Democracy. Toward Consolidation, Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Diamond, L. (2002) 'Thinking about hybrid regimes', Journal of Democracy 13: 2.
7. Diamond, L. (2003) 'Can the Whole World Become Democratic? Democracy, Development, and International Policies', Paper 03'05, University of California, Center for the Study of Democracy.
8. Freedom House (2006) 'Methodology', http://www.freedomhouse.orgitemplate.cfm?page=35&year=2006.
9. Huntington, S.P. (1991) The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman and London: University of Oklahoma Press.
10. Karatnycky, A. (2003) 'Liberty's advances in a troubled world', Journal of Democracy 14: 1.
11. Lazarsfeld, P.F. and Barton, A.H. (1951) 'Qualitative Measurement in the Social Sciences: Classification, Typologies, and Indices', in D. Lerner and H.D. Lasswell (eds.), The Policy Sciences Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12. Mair, P. (2005) 'Popular democracy and the European union polity', European Governance Papers, No. C-05-03, Evrogov, http://www.connex-network.orgieurogou.
13. Munck, G.L. and Verkuilen, J. (2002) 'Conceptualizing and measuring democracy. evaluating alternative indices', Comparative Political Studies 35: 1.
14. O'Donnell, G. (1992) 'Delegative democracy?' Kellogg Institute, Working Paper no. 172.
15. O'Donnell, G. (1993) On the state, democratization and some conceptual problems, Kellog Institute, Working paper no. 192.
16. O'Donnell, G. (2001) 'Democracy, law, and comparative politics', Studies in Comparative International Development 36: 7-36.
17. Sartori, G. (1970) 'Concept misformation in comparative politics', The American Political Science Review 64: 1033-1053.
18. Schumpeter, LA. (1974 [1943]) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: Unwin University Books.
19. Zakaria, F. (1997) 'The rise of illiberal democracy', Foreign Affairs 76: 6.
20. Zakaria, F. (2003) The Future of Freedom. Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad, New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.