Stony endocarp dimension and shape variation in Prunus section Prunus

Annals of Botany

Volumn 100, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1585-1597

  Depypere, Leander ^a   Chaerle, Peter ^a   Mijnsbrugge, Kristine Vander ^b   Goetghebeur, Paul ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Archaeobotany; Dimension and shape variation; Eurasian plums; Index values; Mathematical descriptors; Morphometrics; Prunus section Prunus; Stony endocarps

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; HYDRATION; INDEX METHOD; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TAXONOMY;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; PLANT SEED; PRUNUS;

PRUNUS; SEEDS;

PRUNUS; PRUNUS DOMESTICA;

EID: 36448994050     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcm260     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aradhya MK, Weeks C, Simon CJ. 2004. Molecular characterization of variability and relationships among seven cultivated and selected wild species of Prunus L. using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Scientia Horticulturae 103: 131-144.
2. Arnold ML. 1997. Natural hybridisation and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Barabé D, Daigle S, Labrecque M, St-Arnaud M. 1995. Allometry in the histogenesis of Prunus fruits (Rosaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 73: 299-306.
4. Behre KE. 1978. Formenkreise von Prunus domestica L. von der Wikingerzeit bis in die frühe Neuzeit nach Fruchtsteinen aus Haithabu und Alt-Schleswig. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 91: 161-179.
5. Bortiri E, Oh S-H, Jiang J, Baggett S, Granger A, Weeks C, et al 2001. Phylogeny and systematics of Prunus (Rosaceae) as determined by sequence analysis of ITS and the chloroplast trnL-trnF spacer DNA. Systematic Botany 26: 797-807.
6. Bortiri E, Vanden Heuvel B, Potter D. 2006. Phylogenetic analysis of morphology in Prunus reveals extensive homoplasy. Plant Systematics and Evolution 259: 53-71.
7. Brako L, Zarucchi JL. 1993. Catalogue of the flowering plants and gymnosperms of Peru. Monographs in systematic botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 45: 1-1286.
8. Brewer MT, Lang L, Fujimura K, Dujmovic N, Gray S, van der Knaap E. 2006. Development of a controlled vocabulary and software application to analyze fruit shape variation in tomato and other plant species. Plant Physiology 141: 15-25.
9. Browicz K, Zohary D. 1996. The genus Amygdalus L. (Rosaceae): species relationships, distribution, and evolution under domestication. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43: 229-247.
10. Christensen KI. 1992. Revision of Crataegus sect. Crataegus and nothosec. Crataeguineae (Rosaceae-Maloideae) in the Old World. Systematic Botany Monographs 35: 1-199.
11. Clapham AR, Tutin TG, Warburg EF. (eds) 1962. Prunus. In: Flora of the British Isles, 2nd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 413-419.
12. Elias TS. 1980. The complete trees of North America. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1-948.
13. Fedorov AA, Komarov VL, Kostina KF, Kovalev NV, Krishtofovich AN, Linchevskii IA, Poyarkova AI. 1971. Rosaceae-Rosoideae-Prunoideae. In: Komarov VL. ed. Flora of the USSR, vol. 10. Moscow: Botanical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 380-448.
14. Hanelt P. 1997. European wild relatives of Prunus fruit crops. Bocconea 7: 401-408.
15. Hedrick UP. 1911. The plums of New York. New York: Lyon Company.
16. Hübner S, Wissemann V. 2004. Morphometrische Analysen zur Variabilität von Prunus spinosa L.-Populationen (Prunoideae, Rosaceae) im Mittleren Saaletal, Thüringen. Forum geobotanicum 1: 19-51.
17. Ingram C. 1948. Ornamental cherries. London: Country Life Limited.
18. Kalkman C. 1965. The Old World species of Prunus subg. Laurocerasus including those formerly referred to Pygeum. Blumea 8: 1-174.
19. Katayama H, Uematsu C. 2005. Structural analysis of chloroplast DNA in Prunus (Rosaceae): evolution, genetic diversity and unequal mutations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111: 1430-1439.
20. Körber-Grohne U. 1996. Pflaumen, Kirschpflaumen, Schlehen-Heutige Pflanzen und ihre Geschichte seit der Frühzeit. Stuttgart: Theiss.
21. Krüssmann G. 1978. Handbuch der Laubgehölze, Band III. Berlin and Hamburg: Verlag Paul Parey.
22. Krüssmann G. 1986. Manual of cultivated broad-leaved trees and shrubs, vol. 3. Portland: Timber Press.
23. Kühn F. 1999. Alte Pflaumen, lebende Zeugen mittelalterlichen Obstbaus. Hamburger Werkstattreihe zur Archäologie 4: 70-77.
24. Kuitert W. 1999. Japanese flowering cherries. Portland: Timber Press.
25. Lambinon J, De Langhe J-E, Delvosalle L, Duvigneaud J. 1998. Prunus. In: Flora van België, het Groothertogdom Luxemburg, Noord-Frankrijk en de aangrenzende gebieden (Pteridofyten en Spermatofyten), 3rd edn. Bouchout (Meise): Nationale Plantentuin van België, 337-342.
26. Lee S, Wen J. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of Prunus and the Amygdaloideae (Rosaceae) using ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. American Journal of Botany 88: 150-160.
27. Mason SC. 1913. The pubescent-fruited species of Prunus of the Southwestern States. Journal of Agricultural Research 1: 147-179.
28. Moore JN, Ballington JR Jr. 1990. Genetic resources of temperate fruit and nut crops. Wageningen: International Society for Horticultural Science.
29. Nielsen J, Olrik DC. 2001. A morphometric analysis of Prunus spinosa, P. domestica ssp. insititia, and their putative hybrids in Denmark. Nordic Journal of Botany 21: 349-363.
30. Pollmann B, Jacomet S, Schlumbaum A. 2005. Morphological and genetic studies of waterlogged Prunus species from the Roman vicus Tasgetium (Eschenz, Switzerland). Journal of Archaeological Science 32: 1471-1480.
31. Potter D, Eriksson T, Evans RC, Oh S, Smedmark JEE, Morgan DR, Kerr M, Robertson KR, Arsenault M, Dickinson TA, Campbell CS. 2007. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 266: 5-43.
32. Rehder A. 1940. Manual of cultivated trees and shrubs hardy in North America, 2nd edn. New York: The Macmillan Company.
33. Röder K. 1940. Sortenkundliche Untersuchungen an Prunus domestica. Kühn-Archiv 54: 1-132.
34. Scholz H, Scholz I. 1995. Prunoideae. In: Conert HJ, Jäger EJ, Kadereit JW, Schultze-Motel W, Wagenitz G, Weber HE eds. Gustav Hegi's Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, Band IV Teil 2B. Berlin: Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, 446-510.
35. Shaw J, Small R. 2004. Addressing the 'hardest puzzle in American pomology': phylogeny of Prunus sect. Prunocerasus (Rosaceae) based on seven noncoding chloroplast DNA regions. American Journal of Botany 91: 985-996.
36. Takhtajan A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
37. Taylor HV. 1949. The plums of England. London: Crosby Lockwood & Son.
38. Terral J-F, Alonso N, Capdevila RBI, Chatti N, Fabre L, Fiorentino G, et al. 2004. Historical biogeography of olive domestication (Olea europaea L.) as revealed by geometrical morphometry applied to biological and archaeological material. Journal of Biogeography 31: 63-77.
39. Van Zeist W, Woldring H. 2000. Plum (Prunus domestica L.) varieties in late- and post-medieval Groningen: the archaeobotanical evidence. Palaeohistoria 39/40: 563-576.
40. Van Zeist W, Woldring H, Neef R. 1994. Plant husbandry and vegetation of early medieval Douai, northern France. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 3: 191-218.
41. Wight WF. 1915. Native American species of Prunus. Bulletin of the US Department of Agriculture 179: 1-75.
42. Woldring H. 2000. On the origin of plums: a study of sloe, damson, cherry plum, domestic plums and their intermediates. Palaeohistoria 39/40: 535-562.
43. Yoshioka Y, Iwata H, Ohsawa R, Ninomiya S. 2004. Analysis of petal shape variation Primula sieboldii by elliptic Fourier descriptors and principal component analysis. Annals of Botany 94: 657-664.
44. Yü TT, Lu LT, Ku TC, Li CL, Chen SX. 1986. Amygdaloideae. In: Yü T-t ed. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, Vol. 38. Beijing: Science Press.
45. Zar JH. 1996. Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.