Analysis of petal shape variation of Primula sieboldii by elliptic fourier descriptors and principal component analysis

Annals of Botany

Volumn 94, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 657-664

  Yoshioka, Yosuke ^a   Iwata, Hiroyoshi ^b   Ohsawa, Ryo ^a   Ninomiya, Seishi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Elliptic Fourier descriptors; Petal shape variation; Primula sieboldii; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

FLOWER;

PRIMULA SIEBOLDII; PRIMULACEAE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; EVALUATION; FLOWER; FOURIER ANALYSIS; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HISTOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIMULACEAE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FLOWERS; FOURIER ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PRIMULA; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 16644382364     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mch190     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bagchi SK, Sharma VP, Gupta PK. 1987. Development instability in leaves of Tactona grandis. Silvae Genetica 38: 1-6.
2. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Essex, UK: Longman.
3. Freeman H. 1974. Computerprocessing of line drawing images. Computing Surveys 6: 57-97.
4. Furuta N, Ninomiya S, Takahashi S, Ohmori H, Ukai Y. 1995. Quantitative evaluation of soybean (Glycine max L., Merr.) leaflet shape by principal component scores based on elliptic Fourier descriptor. Breeding Science 45: 315-320.
5. Iwata H, Nesumi H, Ninomiya S, Takano Y, Ukai Y. 2002. The evaluation of genotype X environment interactions of citrus leaf morphology using image analysis and elliptic Fourier descriptors. Breeding Science 52: 243-251.
6. Iwata H, Niikura S, Matsuura S, Takano Y, Ukai Y. 1998. Evaluation of variation of root shape of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.) based on image analysis using elliptic Fourier descriptors. Euphytica 102: 143-149.
7. Iwata H, Ukai Y. 2002. SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. The Journal of Heredity 93: 384-385.
8. Kessler S, Sinha N. 2004. Shaping up: the genetic control of leaf shape. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7: 65-72.
9. Kim GT, Tsukaya H, Uchimiya H. 1998. The ROTUNDIFOLIA3 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a new member of the cytochrome P-450 family that is required for the regulated polar elongation of leaf cells. Genes and Development 12: 2381-2391.
10. Kuhl FP, Giardina CR. 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 18: 236-258.
11. Mather K. 1953. Genetical control of stability in development. Heredity 7: 297-336.
12. McLellan T. 1993. The roles of heterochrony and heteroblasty in the diversification of leaf shapes in Begonia dregei (Begoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 796-804.
13. McLellan T, Endler JA. 1998. The relative success of some methods for measuring and describing the shape of complex objects. Systematic Biology 47: 264-281.
14. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. 2004. A characteristic table/characteristic examination standard. http://www.hinsyu. maff.go.jp/english/index.htm. 16 Jan. 2004.
15. Ohsawa R, Tsutsumi T, Uehara H, Namai H, Ninomiya S. 1998. Quantitative evaluation of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) kernel shape by elliptic Fourier descriptor. Euphytica 101: 175-183.
16. Rohlf FJ, Archie JW. 1984. A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Ritera culicidae). Systematic Zoology 33: 322-317.
17. Sakai K, Shimamoto Y. 1965. Developmental instability in leaves and flowers of Nicotiana tabacum. Genetics 51: 801-813.
18. SAS Institute Inc. 2000. JMP statistics and graphics guide, version 4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
19. Suzuka T. 1975. Nihonsakurasou. Tokyo: NHK-shuppan, 113-167 [in Japanese].
20. Torii T. 1985. Sakurasou. Tokyo: Nippon Television Network Corporation, 114-123 [in Japanese].
21. Toyohara H, Irie K, Ding W, Iwata H, Fujimaki H, Kikuchi F, Ukai Y. 2000. Evaluation of tuber shape of yam (Dioscorea alta L.) cultivars by image analysis and elliptic Fourier descriptors. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics 32: 31-37.
22. Tsuge T, Tsukaya H, Uchimiya H. 1996. Two independent and polarized processes of cell elongation regulate leaf blade expansion in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Development 122: 1589-1600.
23. Tsukaya H. 1995. Developmental genetics of leaf morphogenesis in dicotyledonous plants. Journal of Plant Research 108: 407-416.
24. Tsukaya H. 1998. Genetic evidence for polarities that regulate leaf morphogenesis. Journal of Plant Research 111: 113-119.
25. Uga Y, Fukuta Y, Cai HW, Iwata H, Ohsawa R, Morishima H, Fujimura T. 2003. Mapping QTLs influencing rice floral morphology using recombinant inbred lines derived from a cross between Oryza sativa L. and Oryza rufipogon Griff. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 218-226.
26. Ukai Y. 2002. Genetic analysis of quantitative traits. Tokyo: Igaku-shuppan Inc., 15-47 [in Japanese].
27. Van Valen L. 1962. A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16: 125-142.
28. White R, Rentice HC, Verwist T. 1988. Automated image acquisition and morphometric description. Canadian Journal of Botany 66: 450-459.
29. Yamanaka N, Ninomiya S, Hoshi M, Tsubokura Y, Yano M, Nagamura Y, Sasaki T, Harada K. 2001. An informative linkage map of soybean reveals QTLs for flowering time, leaflet morphology and regions of segregation distortion. DNA Research 8: 61-72.