Survival and success of sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: A retrospective study

Journal of the Canadian Dental Association

Volumn 73, Issue 9, 2007, Pages

  Arlin, Murray L ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; TITANIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LIFE TABLE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOLYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; LIFE TABLES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 36448975824     PISSN: 07098936     EISSN: 14882159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Hirt HP, and others. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 45(2):75-83.
2. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999; 70(12):1523-39.
3. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Van't Hof MA, Jansen JA, Creugers NH. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: a systematic review. J Dent Res 2006; 85(6):496-500.
4. Uribe R, Penarrocha M, Balaguer J, Fulgueiras N. Immediate loading in oral implants. Present situation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2005; 10 Suppl 2:E143-53.
5. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 - review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17(5):536-43.
6. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12(4):486-94.
7. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Persson LG, Lindhe J. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32(5):448-55.
8. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15(4):381-92.
9. Butz F, Aita H, Wang CJ, Ogawa T. Harder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titanium. J Dent Res 2006; 85(6):560-5.
10. Baker D, London RM, O'Neal R. Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: a comparative study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14(5):722-8.
11. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6(1):24-30.
12. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Lausmaa J. Torque and histomorphometric evaluation of c.p. titanium screws blasted with 25- and 75-microns-sized particles of Al2O3. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 30(2):251-60.
13. Khang W, Feldman S, Hawley CE, Gunsolley J. A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities. J Periodontol 2001; 72(10):1384-90.
14. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24(6):565-77.
15. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Taschieri S, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for immediately loaded dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26(3):249-63.
16. Lemmerman KJ, Lemmerman NE. Osseointegrated dental implants in private practice: a long-term case series study. J Periodontol 2005; 76(2):310-9.
17. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, and others. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8(3):161-72.
18. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25(7):889-902.
19. Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Higginbottom FL, Hermann JS, Makins SR, Buser D. Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface in the canine mandible: radiographic results. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7(3):240-52.
20. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 40(1):1-11.
21. Salvi GE, Gallini G, Lang NP. Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) ITI implants in the posterior mandible. A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15(2):142-9.
22. Roccuzzo M, Wilson T. A prospective study evaluating a protocol for 6 weeks' loading of SLA implants in the posterior maxilla: one year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13(5):502-7.
23. Quinlan P, Nummikoski P, Schenk R, Cagna D, Mellonig J, Higginbottom F, and others. Immediate and early loading of SLA ITI single-tooth implants: an in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20(3):360-70.
24. Nordin T, Nilsson R, Frykholm A, Hallman M. A 3-arm study of early loading of rough-surfaced implants in the completely edentulous maxilla and in the edentulous posterior maxilla and mandible: results after 1 year of loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19(6):880-6.
25. Bornstein MM, Lussi A, Schmid B, Belser UC, Buser D. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18(5):659-66.
26. Luongo G, Di Raimondo R, Filippini P, Gualini F, Paoleschi C. Early loading of sandblasted, acid-etched implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year follow-up report from a multicenter 3-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20(1):84-91.
27. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, and others. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13(2):144-53.
28. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12(6):572-8.
29. Buser D, von Arx T, ten Bruggenkate C, Weingart D. Basic surgical principles with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11 Suppl 1:59-68.
30. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1(1):11-25.
31. Smith P. Analysis of failure and survival data. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2002.
32. Nedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM, Beyer S, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP. A 7-year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants. Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15(2):150-7