CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database

Global Change Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2509-2537

  Luyssaert, Sebastiaan ^a,b   Inglima, I ^c   Jung, M ^d   Richardson, A D ^e   Reichstein, M ^d   Papale, D ^f   Piao, S L ^g   Schulze, E D ^d   Wingate, L ^h   Matteucci, G ⁱ   Aragao, L ^j   Aubinet, M ^k   Beer, C ^d   Bernhofer, C ^l   Black, K G ^m,n   Bonal, D ^o   Bonnefond, J M ^p   Chambers, J ^q   Ciais, P ^g   Cook, B ^r   Davis, K J ^s   Dolman, A J ^t   Gielen, B ^a   Goulden, M ^u   Grace, J ^h   Granier, A ^v   Grelle, A ^w   Griffis, T ^r   Grunwald T ^l   Guidolotti, G ^f   Hanson, P J ^x   Harding, R ^y   Hollinger, D Y ^z   Hutyra, L R ^aa   Kolari, P ^ab   Kruijt, B ^ac   Kutsch, W ^d   Lagergren, F ^ad   Laurila, T ^ae   Law, B E ^b   Le Maire, G ^g   Lindroth, A ^ad   Loustau, D ^p   Malhi, Y ^j   Mateus, J ^af   Migliavacca, M ^ag   Misson, L ^ah   Montagnani, L ^ai   Moncrieff, J ^h   Moors, E ^ac   Munger, J W ^aa   Nikinmaa, E ^ab   Ollinger, S V ^e   Pita, G ^af   Rebmann, C ^d   Roupsard, O ^aj   Saigusa, N ^ak   Sanz, M J ^al   Seufert, G ^am   Sierra, C ^b   Smith, M L ^z   Tang, J ^r   Valentini, R ^f   Vesala, T ^ab   Janssens, I A ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOGEOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

^g LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

^h UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche   (Italy)

^j UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^k UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^l DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^m UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

ⁿ Irish Council for Forest Research and Development (COFORD)   (Ireland)

^o Campus Agronomique   (France)

^p BORDEAUX SCIENCES AGRO   (France)

^q Tulane University   (United States)

^r UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^s PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^t VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^u UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^v CEMAGREF   (France)

^w SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^x OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^y CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^z USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^aa HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ab UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^ac WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^ad LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^ae FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^af INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^ag UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^ah CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^ai Laboratory of Chemical Physics   (Italy)

^aj CIRAD   (France)

^ak NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^al FUNDACIÓN CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS AMBIENTALES DEL MEDITERRÁNEO CEAM   (Spain)

^am JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

Carbon cycle; CO2; Forest ecosystems; Global database; Gross primary productivity; Net ecosystem productivity; Net primary productivity

Indexed keywords

ADVECTION; ATMOSPHERIC SINK; BOREAL FOREST; CARBON BUDGET; CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; CARBON FLUX; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; GLOBAL CHANGE; LEAF AREA INDEX; NET ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTION; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; TEMPERATE FOREST; TROPICAL FOREST;

EID: 36349011373     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: 13652486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01439.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Amiro BD, Barr AG, Black TA et al. (2006) Carbon, energy and water fluxes at mature and disturbed forest sites, Saskatchewan, Canada. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 136, 237-251.
2. Amthor JS (2000) The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later. Annals of Botany, 86, 1-20.
3. Araujo AC, Nobre AD, Kruijt B et al. (2002) Comparative measurements of carbon dioxide fluxes from two nearby towers in a central Amazonian rainforest: The Manaus LBA site. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 107, 8090-9019.
4. Baldocchi D (2003) Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: Past, present and future. Global Change Biology, 9, 479-492.
5. Baldocchi D, Falge E, Gu LH et al. (2001) FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 82, 2415-2434.
6. Black K, Bolger T, Davis P et al. (2007) Inventory and eddy covariance-based estimates of annual carbon sequestration in a Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) forest ecosystem. European Journal of Forest Research, 126, 167-178.
7. 2O fluxes of terrestrial ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 13, 751-760.
8. Chapin FS, Woodwell GM, Randerson JT et al. (2006) Reconciling carbon-cycle concepts, terminology and methodology. Ecosystems, 9, 1041-1050.
9. Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N et al. (2005) Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused bt the heat and drought in 2003. Nature, 437, 529-533.
10. Clark DA (2002) Are tropical forests an important carbon sink? Reanalysis of the long-term plot data. Ecological Applications, 12, 3-7.
11. Clark DA, Brown S, Kicklighter DW et al. (2001) Measuring net primary production in forests: Concepts and field methods. Ecological Applications, 11, 356-370.
12. Cramer W, Kicklighter DW, Bondeau A et al. (1999) Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): Overview and key results. Global Change Biology, 5, 1-15.
13. Falge E, Baldocchi D, Olson R et al. (2001) Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 107, 43-69.
14. Global Soil Data Task (2000) Global Soil Data Products CD-ROM (IGBP-DIS). International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, Data and Information System, Potsdam, Germany. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, http://www.daac.ornl.gov
15. Goulden ML, Munger JW, Fan SM et al. (1996) Measurements of carbon sequestration by long-term eddy covariance: Methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy. Global Change Biology, 2, 169-182.
16. Gower ST, Pongracic S, Landsberg JJ (1996) A global trend in belowground carbon allocation: Can we use the relationship at smaller scales? Ecology, 77, 1750-1755.
17. Grace J, Malhi Y (2002) Carbon dioxide goes with the flow. Nature, 416, 594-595.
18. Griffis TJ, Black TA, Morgenstern K et al. (2003) Ecophysiological controls on the carbon balances of three southern boreal forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 117, 53-71.
19. Guenther A, Hewitt CN, Erickson D et al. (1995) A global-model of natural volatile organic-compound emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 100, 8873-8892.
20. Hanson PJ, Edwards NT, Garten CT et al. (2000) Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: A review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry, 48, 115-146.
21. Hanson PJ, Edwards NT, Tschaplinski TJ, Wullschleger SD, Joslin JD (2003) Estimating the net primary and net ecosystem production of a southeastern upland Quercus forest from an 8-year biometric record. In: North American Temperate Deciduous Forest Responses to Changing Precipitation Regimes (eds Hanson PJ, Wullschleger SD), pp. 472. Springer, New York.
22. 2 exchange. Global Change Biology, 10, 1689-1706.
23. Hollinger DY, Richardson AD (2005) Uncertainty in eddy covariance measurements and its application to physiological models. Tree Physiology, 25, 873-885.
24. Jager HI, Hargrove WW, Brandt CC et al. (2000) Constructive contrasts between modeled and measured climate responses over a regional scale. Ecosystems, 3, 396-411.
25. Janssens IA, Lankreijer H, Matteucci G et al. (2001) Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests. Global Change Biology, 7, 269-278.
26. Keppler F, Hamilton JTG, BraB M et al. (2006) Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions. Nature, 439, 187.
27. Krinner G, Viovy N, de Noblet-Ducoudre N et al. (2005) A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19, 1015.
28. Kruijt B, Elbers JA, von Randow C et al. (2004) The robustness of eddy correlation fluxes for Amazon rain forest conditions. Ecological Applications, 14, S101-S113.
29. Law BE, Falge E, Gu L et al. (2002) Environmental controls over carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of terrestrial vegetation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 113, 97-120.
30. Law BE, Turner D, Campbell J et al. (2004) Disturbance and climate effects on carbon stocks and fluxes across Western Oregon USA. Global Change Biology, 10, 1429-1444.
31. Lieth HFH, Whittaker RH (1975) Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. Springer-Verlag, New York.
32. Malhi Y, Baldocchi DD, Jarvis PG (1999) The carbon balance of tropical, temperate and boreal forests. Plant Cell and Environment, 22, 715-740.
33. Malhi Y, Grace J (2000) Tropical forests and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 332-337.
34. Mitchell TD, Jones PD (2005) An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 693-712.
35. Olson RJ, Johnson KR, Zheng DL et al. (2001) Global and regional ecosystem modeling: Database of model drivers and validation measurements. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
36. Oren RAM, Hsieh C-I, Stoy P et al. (2006) Estimating the uncertainty in annual net ecosystem carbon exchange: Spatial variation in turbulent fluxes and sampling errors in eddy-covariance measurements. Global Change Biology, 12, 883-896.
37. Papale D, Reichstein M, Aubinet M et al. (2006) Towards a standardized processing of net ecosystem exchange measured with eddy covariance technique: Algorithms and uncertainty estimation. Biogeosciences, 3, 571-583.
38. Penning de Vries FWT, Brunstin AHM, Vanlaar HH (1974) Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis - quantitative approach. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 45, 339-377.
39. Phillips OL, Malhi Y, Higuchi N et al. (1998) Changes in the carbon balance of tropical forests: Evidence from long-term plots. Science, 282, 439-442.
40. Phillips OL, Martinez RV, Arroyo L et al. (2002) Increasing dominance of large lianas in Amazonian forests. Nature, 418, 770-774.
41. Raich JW, Nadelhoffer KJ (1989) Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems: Global trends. Ecology, 70, 1346-1354.
42. Randerson JT, Chapin FS, Harden JW et al. (2002) Net ecosystem production: A comprehensive measure of net carbon accumulation by ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 12, 937-947.
43. Reich PF, Eswaran H (2002) Global resources. In: Encyclopedia of Soil Science (ed. Lal R), pp. 607-611. Marcel Dekker, New York.
44. Reichstein M, Falge E, Baldocchi D et al. (2005) On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm. Global Change Biology, 11, 1424-1439.
45. Reichstein M, Rey A, Freibauer A et al. (2003) Modeling temporal and large-scale spatial variability of soil respiration from soil water availability, temperature and vegetation productivity indices. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17, 1104-1118.
46. Richardson AD, Hollinger DY (2005) Statistical modeling of ecosystem respiration using eddy covariance data: Maximum likelihood parameter estimation, and Monte Carlo simulation of model and parameter uncertainty, applied to three simple models. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 131, 191-208.
47. Richardson AD, Hollinger DY, Burba GG et al. (2006) A multi-site analysis of random error in tower-based measurements of carbon and energy fluxes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 136, 1-18.
48. 2. Nature, 416, 617-620.
49. Ryan MG, Hubbard RM, Pongracic S et al. (1996) Foliage, fine-root, woody-tissue and stand respiration in Pinus radiata in relation to nitrogen status. Tree Physiology, 16, 333-343.
50. Saleska SR, Miller SD, Matross DM et al. (2003) Carbon in amazon forests: Unexpected seasonal fluxes and disturbance-induced losses. Science, 302, 1554-1557.
51. Schimel DS, House JI, Hibbard KA et al. (2001) Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Nature, 414, 169-172.
52. Schulze ED (2005) Plant Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
53. Schulze ED, Heimann M (1998) Carbon and water exchange of terrestrial systems. In: Asian Change in the Context of Global Change. IGBP Series, Vol. 3 (eds Galloway JN, Melillo J), pp. 145-161. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
54. Schulze ED, Wirth C, Heimann M (2000) "Kyoto forests" and a broader perspective on management - response. Science, 290, 1896-1896.
55. Schuur EAG (2003) Productivity and global climate revisited: The sensitivity of tropical forest growth to precipitation. Ecology, 84, 1165-1170.
56. Scurlock JMO, Olson RJ (2002) Terrestrial net primary productivity - a brief history and a new worldwide database. Environmental Reviews, 10, 91-109.
57. Tucker CJ, Pinzon JE, Brown ME et al. (2005) An extended AVHRR 8-km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, 4485-4498.
58. Valentini R, Matteucci G, Dolman AJ et al. (2000) Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature, 404, 861-865.