Exploring modular domino reactions: Competing processes based on the nature of the angular substituent

Organic Letters

Volumn 9, Issue 23, 2007, Pages 4841-4844

  Elkhayat, Zobida ^a   Safir, Imad ^a   Retailleau, Pascal ^a   Arseniyadis, Siméon ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; SYNTHESIS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; OXIDATION-REDUCTION;

EID: 36348961994     PISSN: 15237060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ol7021643     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. (a) Tietze, L. F.; Beifuss, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 131-163.
2. (b) Tietze, L. F. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 115-136.
3. (c) Tietze, L. F.; Modi, A. Med. Res. Rev. 2000, 20, 304-322.
4. (d) Tietze, L. F.; Haunert, F. In Stimulating Concepts in Chemistry; Shibasaki, M., Stoddart, J. F., Vogtle, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2000; pp 39-64.
5. (e) Domino Reactions In Organic Synthesis; Tietze, L. F., Brasche, G., Gericke, K. M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006; ISBN: 3-527-29060-5.
6. The probe used is an unsaturated bicyclic 1,2-diol having a variable substitution pattern. Advantages are the very rapid increase in molecular complexity and its modular character. (a) Finet, L.; Candela Lena, J. I.; Kaoudi, T.; Birlirakis, N.; Arseniyadis, S. Chem. - Eur. J. 2003, 9, 3813-3820.
7. (b) Safir, I.; Castellote, I.; Porcel, S.; Kaoudi, T.; Birlirakis, N.; Toupet, L.; Arseniyadis, S. Chem. - Eur. J. 2006, 12, 7337-7344.
8. Candela Lena, J. I.; Sánchez Fernández, E.; Ramani, A.; Birlirakis, N.; Barrero, A. F.; Arseniyadis, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 683-700.
9. (a) Chanu, A.; Safir, I.; Basak, R.; Chiaroni, A.; Arseniyadis, S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1351-1354.
10. (b) Chanu, A.; Safir, I.; Basak, R.; Chiaroni, A.; Arseniyadis, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 4305-4312.
11. 4: Criegee, R.; Beucker, H. Ann. Chem. 1939, 541, 218-238.
12. 2+ but without the toxic and environmental issues: (a) Moriarty, R. M.; Vaid, R. K. Synthesis 1990, 431-447.
13. (b) Varvoglis, A. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 1179-1255.
14. (c) Ladziata, U.; Zhdankin, V. ARKIVOC 2006, ix, 26-58.
15. (a) Lautens, M.; Tam, W.; Lautens, J. C.; Edwards, L. G.; Crudden, C. M.; Smith, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6863-6879.
16. (b) Lautens, M.; Klute, W.; Tam, W. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 49-92.
17. Carbonaro, A.; Cambrisi, F.; Dall'Asta, G. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 1443-1445.
18. Kiattansakul, R.; Snyder, J. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1079-1082.
19. Candela Lena, J. I.; Altinel, E.; Birlirakis, N.; Arseniyadis, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1409-1412.
20. For a discussion of pericyclic reaction transition states, see: Houk, K. N.; Gonzales, J.; Li, Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 81-90.
21. Best preparation of the common intermediate 1: (a) Jung, M. E.; Piizzi, G. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 137-140.
22. (b) Jung, M. E.; Piizzi, G. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2572-2582.
23. It should be pointed out that all domino reactions are performed on crude diastereomeric mixtures; we only show the stereopure target diols for characterization purposes, by separating various amounts of stereopure compounds using the eluent indicated in the experimental part.
24. Hanselmann, R.; Benn, M. Synth. Commun. 1996, 26, 945-961.
25. 3.
26. 13C NMR of the crude material showed no resonances other than those due to the expected products 16-21.