Host plant effects on the functional response of Neoseiulus cucumeris to onion thrips larvae

Journal of Applied Entomology

Volumn 131, Issue 9-10, 2007, Pages 728-733

  Madadi, H ^a,d   Enkegaard, A ^b   Brodsgaard, H F ^b,e   Kharrazi Pakdel, A ^a   Mohaghegh, J ^c   Ashouri, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b DANISH INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Denmark)

^c PLANT PESTS AND DISEASES RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Iran)

^d BU ALI SINA UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^e EWH BioProduction ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

Biological control; Phytoseiidae; Thripidae; Thrips tabaci; Tritrophic interactions

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; HERBIVORE; HOST PLANT; MITE; NATURAL ENEMY; OPTIMIZATION; PEST CONTROL; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; THRIPS;

ACARI; ALLIUM CEPA; CAPSICUM ANNUUM VAR. ANNUUM; CUCUMIS SATIVUS; NEOSEIULUS CUCUMERIS; PHYTOSEIIDAE; SOLANUM MELONGENA; THRIPIDAE; THRIPS TABACI;

EID: 36348947506     PISSN: 09312048     EISSN: 14390418     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01206.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Agrawal A, 2000. Mechanisms, ecological consequences and agricultural implications of tri-trophic interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3, 329 335.
2. Allahyari H, Fard PA, Nozari J, 2004. Effects of host on functional response of offspring in two populations of Trissolcus grandis on the sunn pest. J. Appl. Entomol. 128, 39 43.
3. Bakker FM, Sabelis MW, 1986. Attack success of Amblyseius mckenziei and the stage related defensive capacity. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent. 51, 1041 1044.
4. Castagnoli M, Simoni S, 1999. Effect of long-term feeding history on functional and numerical response of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23, 217 234.
5. Cortesero AM, Stapel JO, Lewis WJ, 2000. Understanding and manipulating plant attributes to enhance biological control. Biol. Control 17, 35 39.
6. de Courcy Williams M, Wright E, 1999. A bioassay technique to determine the functional response of different predators of Frankliniella occidentalis in ornamentals. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 22(1), 287 290.
7. Cuellar ME, Belotti AC, Melo EL, 2002. Aspects of the biology and rate of consumption of Neoseiulus cucumeris and Typhlodromalus aripo (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on the host Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 28, 1 7.
8. De Clercq P, Mohaghegh J, Tirry L, 2000. Effect of host plant on the functional response of the predator Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Biol. Control 18, 65 70.
9. Dicke M, Sabelis MW, Takabayashi J, Bruin J, Posthumus MA, 1990. Plant strategies of manipulating predator-prey interactions through allelochemicals: prospects for application in pest control. J. Chem. Ecol 16, 3091 3118.
10. Donnelly BE, Phillips TW, 2001. Functional response of Xylocoris flaviceps (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae): effects of prey species and habitat. Environ. Entomol. 30, 617 624.
11. Eveleigh ES, Chant, DA, 1981. Experimental studies on acarine predator-prey interactions: effect of predator age and feeding history on prey consumption and the functional response (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool. 59, 1387 1406.
12. Faria LDB, Godoy WAC, Trinca LA, 2004. Dynamics of handling time and functional response by larvae of Chrysomya albiceps (Dip., Calliphoridae) on different prey species. J. Appl. Entomol. 6, 432 436.
13. Hassell MP, 1978. The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. 1st edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
14. Hoddle MS, 2003. The effect of prey species and environmental complexity on the functional response of Franklinothrips orizabensis: a test of the fractal foraging model. Ecol. Entomol. 28, 309 318.
15. Holling CS, 1959. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can. Entomol. 91, 293 320.
16. Jeschke JM, Kopp M, Tollrian R, 2002. Predator functional responses: discriminating between handling and digesting prey. Ecol. Monogr. 72, 95 112.
17. Juliano SA, 2001. Nonlinear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves. In : Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Ed. by Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, 178 196.
18. Koveos DS, Broufas GD, 2000. Functional response of Euseius finlandicus and Amblyseius andersoni to Panonychus ulmi on apple and peach leaves in the laboratory. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 24, 247 256.
19. Krips OE, Kleijn PW, Willems PEL, Gols JZ, Dicke M, 1999. Leaf hairs influence searching efficiency and predation rate of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23, 119 133.
20. Kumar A, Kumar N, Siddiqui A, Tripathi CPM, 1999. Prey-predator relationship between Lipaphis erysimi Kalt. (Hom., Aphididae) and Coccinella septempunctata L. (Col., Coccinellidae). II. Effect of host plants on functional response of the predator. J. Appl. Entomol. 123, 591 601.
21. Lester PJ, Harmsen R, 2002. Functional and numerical responses do not always indicate the most effective predator for biological control: an analysis of two predators in a two-prey system. J. Appl. Ecol. 39, 455 468.
22. Letourneau DK, 1988. Conceptual framework of three-trophic interactions. In : Novel aspects of insect-plant interactions. Ed. by Barbosa P, Letourneau DK, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1 9.
23. Li J, Wu Q, Yang Y, 2003. Functional response of female adults of Amblyseius cucumeris to Polyphagotarsonemus latus. Fudan Xuebao Zirankexueban 42, 593 596.
24. Madadi H, Kharrazi Pakdel A, Ashouri A, Mohaghegh J, 2006. Life history parameters of Thrips tabaci (Thys.: Thripidae) on cucumber, sweet pepper and eggplant under laboratory conditions. J. Entomol. Soc. Iran 25, 45 62 (in Persian with English abstract).
25. McCaffrey JH, Horsburgh RL, 1986. Functional response of Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to the European red mite, Panonychus ulmi (Acari: Tetranychidae), at different constant temperatures. Environ. Entomol. 15, 532 535.
26. McMurtry JA, Croft BA, 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42, 291 321.
27. Messina FJ, Hanks JB, 1998. Host plant alters the shape of the functional response of an aphid predator (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environ. Entomol. 27, 1196 1202.
28. Mohaghegh J, De Clercq P, Tirry L, 2001. Functional response of the predators Podisus maculiventris (Say) and Podisus nigrispinus (Dallas) (Het.: Pentatomidae) to the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hubner) (Lep.: Noctuidae): effect of temperature. J. Appl. Entomol. 125, 131 134.
29. Parajulee MN, Phillips TW, Hogg DB, 1994. Functional response of Lyctocoris campestris (F.) adults: effects of predator sex, prey species and experimental habitat. Biol. Control 4, 80 87.
30. Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, McPheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE, 1980. Interactions among three trophic levels: Influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 11, 41 45.
31. Rogers D, 1972. Random predator search and insect population models. J. Anim. Ecol. 41, 369 383.
32. Sabelis MW, van Baalen M, Bakker FM, Bruin J, Drukker B, Egas M, Janssen ARM, Lesna IK, Pels B, van Rijn PCJ. Scutareanu P, 1999. The evolution of direct and indirect plant defence against herbivorous arthropods. In : Herbivores: between plants and predators. Ed. by Olff H, Brown VK, Drent RH, Oxford Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, 109 166.
33. SAS Institute Inc., 1993. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6. 4th edn, volumes 1 and 2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
34. Shipp JL, Whitfield GH, 1991. Functional response of the predatory mite, Amblyseius cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae), on western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Environ. Entomol. 20, 694 699.
35. Skirvin DJ, Fenlon JS, 2001. Plant species modifies the functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): implications for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Res. 91, 61 67.
36. Skirvin DJ, Fenlon JS, 2003. The effect of temperature on the functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 31, 37 39.
37. Southwood SR, 1986. Plant surface and insects - an overview. In : Insects and the plant surface. Ed. by Juniper B, Southwood SR, Edward Arnold, London, UK, 1 22.
38. Sutterlin S, van Lenteren JC, 1997. Influence of hairiness of Gerbera jamesonii leaves on the searching efficiency of the parasitoid Encarsia formosa. Biol. Control 9, 157 165.
39. Svendsen MS, Enkegaard A, Brødsgaard H, 1999. Influence of humidity on the functional response of larvae of the gall midge (Feltiella acarisuga) feeding on spider mite eggs. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 22(1), 243 246.
40. Takabayashi J, Dicke M, 1996. Plant-carnivore mutualism through herbivore-induced carnivore attractants. Trends Plant Sci. 1, 109 113.
41. Trexler JC, Travis J, 1993. Nontraditional regression analysis. Ecology 74, 1629 1637.
42. Turlings TCJ, Tumlinson JH, Lewis WJ, 1990. Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250, 1251 1253.
43. Van Haren RJF, Steenhuis MM, Sabelis MW, De Ponti OMB, 1987. Tomato stem trichomes and dispersal success of Phytoseiulus persimilis relative to its prey Tetranychus urticae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 3, 115 121.
44. Van Lenteren JC, Hua L-Z, Kamerman JW, Rumei X, 1995. The parasite-host relationship between Encarsia formosa (Hym., Aphelinidae) and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hom., Aleyrodidae): XXVI. Leaf hairs reduce the capacity of Encarsia to control greenhouse whitefly on cucumber. J. Appl. Entomol. 119, 553 559.
45. Vet LEM, Dicke M, 1992. Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37, 141 172.
46. Wei Q, Walde SJ, 1997. The functional response of Typhlodromus pyri to its prey, Panonychus ulmi: the effect of pollen. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 21, 677 684.
47. Zhang ZQ, 2003. Mites of greenhouses. Identification, biology and control. 1st edn. CABI Publishing, Cambridge.