Host Plant Alters the Shape of the Functional Response of an Aphid Predator (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1196-1202

  Messina, Frank J ^a   Hanks, John B ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological control; Diuraphis noxia; Functional response; Propylea quatuordecimpunctata; Tritrophic interactions

Indexed keywords

ACHNATHERUM HYMENOIDES; AGROPYRON; AGROPYRON CRISTATUM; AGROPYRON DESERTORUM; APHIDIDAE; COCCINELLIDAE; COLEOPTERA; DIURAPHIS NOXIA; MARTES PENNANTI; ORYZOPSIS; PROPYLEA; PROPYLEA QUATUORDECIMPUNCTATA; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 0000593879     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ee/27.5.1196     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abrams, P. A. 1990. The effects of adaptive behavior on the type-2 functional response. Ecology 71: 877-885.
2. Agresti, A. 1990. Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York.
3. Bergeson, E., and F. J. Messina. 1997. Resource-versus enemy-mediated interactions between cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) on a common host plant. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 90: 425-432.
4. Burd, J. D., and R. L. Burton. 1992. Characterization of plant damage caused by Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 85: 2017-2022.
5. Carter, M. C., D. Sutherland, and A.F.G. Dixon. 1984. Plant structure and the searching efficiency of coccinellid larvae. Oecologia (Berl.) 63: 394-397.
6. Chesson, J. 1989. The effect of alternative prey on the functional response of Notonecta hoffmani. Ecology 70:1227-1235.
7. Clark, T. L., and F. J. Messina. 1998. Plant architecture and the foraging success of ladybird beetles attacking the Russian wheat aphid. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 86:153-161.
8. Coll, M., and R. L. Ridgway. 1995. Funct. and numerical responses of Onus insidiosus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) to its prey in different vegetable crops. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 88: 732-738.
9. Colton, T. F. 1987. Extending functional response models to include a second prey type: an experimental test. Ecology 68: 900-912.
10. Da Silva, P. G., K. S. Hagen, and A. P. Gutierrez. 1992. Functional response of Curinus coleruleus (Col.: Coccinellidae) to Heteropsylla cubana (Horn.: Psyllidae) on artificial and natural substrates. Entomophaga 37: 555-564.
11. Day, W. H., D. R. Prokrym, D. R. Ellis, and R. J. Chianese. 1994. The known distribution of the predator Propylea quatuordecimpunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the United States, and thoughts on the origin of this species and five other exotic lady beetles in eastern North America. Entomol. News 105: 244-256.
12. Feng, M. G., J. B. Johnson, R. M. Nowierski, and S. E. Halbert. 1992. Population trends and biological aspects of cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae), and their natural mortality factors on winter wheat in southwestern Idaho. Pan-Pac. Entomol. 68: 248-260.
13. Geitzenauer, H. L., and E. A. Bernays. 1996. Plant effects on prey choice by a vespid asp, Polistes arizonensis. Ecol. Entomol. 21: 227-234.
14. Gross, P. 1991. Influence of target pest feeding niche on success rates in classical biological control. Environ. Entomol. 20: 1217-1227.
15. Hare, J. D. 1992. Effects of plant variation on herbivore-natural enemy interactions, pp. 278-298. In R. S. Fritz and E. L. Simms [eds.], Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, and genetics. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
16. Hassell, M. P. 1978. The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
17. Hawkins, B. A., M. B. Thomas, and M. E. Hochberg. 1993. Refuge theory and biological control. Science (Wash. D.C.) 262: 1429-1432.
18. Hemptinne, J.-L., A.F.G. Dixon, and G. Lognay. 1996. Searching behaviour and mate recognition by males of the two-spot ladybird beetle, Adalia bipunctata. Ecol. Entomol. 21: 165-170.
19. Hilborn, R., and M. Mangel. 1997. The ecological detective: confronting models with data. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
20. Holling, C. S. 1966. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Canada 48: 1-86.
21. Juliano, S. A. 1993. Non-linear curve-fitting: predation and functional response curves, pp. 158-183. In S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch [eds.], Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman & Hall, New York.
22. Juliano, S. A., and F. M. Williams. 1987. A comparison of methods for estimating the functional response parameters of the random predator equation. J. Anim. Ecol. 56: 641-653.
23. Kaiser, H. 1983. Small scale spatial heterogeneity influences predation success in an unexpected way: model experiments on the functional response of predatory mites (Acarina). Oecologia (Berl.) 56: 249-256.
24. Kareiva, P., and G. Odell. 1987. Swarms of predators exhibit "prey-taxis" if individual predators use area-restricted search. Am. Nat. 130: 233-270.
25. Kareiva, P., and R. Sahakian. 1990. Tritrophic effects of a simple architectural mutation in pea plants. Nature (Lond.) 345: 433-434.
26. Kauffman, W. C., and S. L. LaRoche. 1994. Searching activities by coccinellids on rolled wheat leaves infested by the Russian wheat aphid. Biol. Control 4: 290-297.
27. Luck, R. F., B. Shepard, and P. E. Kenmore. 1988. Experimental methods for evaluating arthropod natural enemies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 33:367-392.
28. Messina, F. J., T. A. Jones, and D. C. Nielson. 1993. Seasonal variation in performance of the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) on alternate hosts. Environ. Entomol. 22: 1022-1030.
29. Messina, F. J., T. A. Jones, and D. C. Nielson. 1997. Host-plant effects on the efficacy of two predators attacking Russian wheat aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ. Entomol. 26: 1398-1404.
30. Obrycki, J. J. 1986. The influence of foliar pubescence on entomophagous species, pp. 61-83. In D.J. Boethel and R.J. Eikenbarry [eds.], J. Interactions of plant resistance and parasitoids and predators of insects. Wiley, New York.
31. O'Neil, R. J. 1989. Comparison of laboratory and field measurements of the functional response of Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 62: 148-155.
32. O'Neil, R. J. 1997. Functional response and search strategy of Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) attacking Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ. Entomol. 26: 1183-1190.
33. Parajulee, M. N., T. W. Phillips, and D. B. Hogg. 1994. Functional response of Lyctocoris campestris (F.) adults: effects of predator sex, prey species, and experimental habitat. Biol. Control 4: 80-87.
34. Price, P. W. 1986. Ecological aspects of host plant resistance and biological control: interactions among three trophic levels, pp. 11-30. In D. J. Boethel and R. J. Eikenbarry [eds.], Interactions of plant resistance and parasitoids and predators of insects. Wiley, New York.
35. Ritchie, M. E. 1998. Scale-dependent foraging and patch choice in fractal environments. Evol. Ecol. 12: 309-330.
36. Rogers, D. J. 1972. . Random search and insect population models. J. Anim. Ecol. 41: 369-383.
37. Ryoo, M. I. 1996. Influence of the spatial distribution pattern of prey among patches and spatial coincidence of the functional and numerical response of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina, Phytoseiidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 120: 187-192.
38. SAS Institute. 1990. SAS/STAT user's guide: statistics, version 6. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
39. Solomon, M. E. 1949. The natural control of animal populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 18: 1-35.
40. Spitze, K. 1985. Functional response of an ambush predator: Chaoborus americanus predation on Daphnia pulex. Ecology 66: 938-949.
41. Stubbendieck, J. L., S. L. Hatch, and C. H. Butterfield. 1992. North American range plants, 4th ed. University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
42. Taylor, R. J. 1984. Predation. Chapman & Hall, New York.
43. Trexler, J. C., C. E. McCulloch, and J. Travis. 1988. How can the functional response best be determined? Oecologia (Berl.) 76: 206-214.
44. Trexler, J. C., and J. Travis. 1993. Nontraditional regression analyses. Ecology 74: 1629-1637.
45. van Alebeek, F.A.N., T. N. Bezemer, A. van Huis, and J. C. van Lenteren. 1996. The functional response of Uscana lariophaga under different egg distributions of its host Callosobruchus maculatus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 81: 227-233.
46. Wilkinson, L., G. Blank, and C. Gruber. 1996. Desktop data analysis with SYSTAT. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
47. Williams, F. M., and S. A. Juliano. 1996. Functional responses revisited. Environ. Entomol. 25: 549-550.