Application of two hydrological models to Weihe River basin: A comparison of VIC - 3L and SWAT

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 6754, Issue PART 1, 2007, Pages

  Hongchang, Hu ^a   Genxu, Wang ^a,b   Xuemei, Bi ^c   Fengmei, Yang ^a   Chongyi, E ^a  

^a LANZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF MOUNTAIN HAZARDS AND ENVIRONMENT   (China)

^c NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

LUCC; Model intercomparison; Response; SWAT; VIC 3L

Indexed keywords

EARTH ATMOSPHERE; HYDROLOGY; RIVERS; SOILS; VEGETATION;

HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; SOIL WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL (SWAT);

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 36249030012     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.764920     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Brendecke, C.M., Laiho, D.R. and Holden, D.C, "Comparison of two daily runoff simulation models of an alpine watershed," J. Hydrol. 77, 171-186 (1985).
2. Cherkauer K. A., L. C. Bowling, and D. P. Lettenmaier, "Variable infiltration capacity cold land process model updates, Global and Planetary Change," 38, 151-159(2003).
3. F. NAEF, "Can we model the rainfall-runoff process today?," Hydrological Sciences - Bulletin - des Sciences Hydrologiques. 26(3), 281-289 (1981).
4. F.H.S. Chiew, M.J. Stewardson, and T.A. McMahon, "Comparison of six rainfall-runoff modeling approaches Journal of Hydrology," 147, 1-36 (1993).
5. Franchini, M. and Pacciani, M., "Comparative analysis of several conceptual rainfall runoff models," J. Hydrol. 122, 161-219(1991).
6. Jene Michaud, Soroosh Sorooshian, "Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff model on a midsized semiarid watershed," water resources research. 30(3), 593-605 (1994).
7. Johnsona, William F. Coonb, and Vishal K. Mehtaa et al., "Application of two hydrologic models with different runoff mechanisms to a hillslope dominated watershed in the northeastern US: a comparison of HSPF and SMR," Journal of Hydrology. 284, 57-76 (2003).
8. Loague. K. M., R. A. Freeze, "A comparison of rainfall-runoff modeling techniques on small upland catchments," Water Resour. Res., 21(2), 229-248(1985).
9. Lohmann D., E. Raschke B. Nijssen, and D. P. Lettenmaier, "Regional Scale Hydrology: I. Formulation of the VIC2L Model Coupled to a Routing Model", Hydrological Sciences Journal, 43(1), 131-141(1998).
10. Lohmann D., E. Raschke B. Nijssen, and D. P. Lettenmaier, "Regional Scale Hydrology: II. Application of the VIC2L Model to the Weser River, Germany", Hydrological Sciences Journal, 43(1), 143-157(1998).
11. Michael B. Smith, Dong-Jun Seo, and Victor I. Koren et al., "The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): motivation and experiment design," Journal of Hydrology. 298,4-26 (2004).
12. Michael B. Smith, Xu Liang, "The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP)," Journal of Hydrology. 298, 1-3 (2004).
13. Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, J.V., "River flow forecasting through conceptual models Part 1-a discussion of principles,"Journal of Hydrology. 10 (4), 282-290 (1970).
14. P. Wilcox, W.I.Rawls, D.L.Brakensied, and J.Ross, "Predicting runoff from Rangeland catchments: A comparison of two models Bradford," Wight Water resources research. 26(10), 2401-2410 (1990).
15. Perrin, C., Michel, C., Andreassian, V., "Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments," J. Hydrol. 242, 275-301 (2001).
16. Refsgaard, J.C., Knudsen, J., "Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models," WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH. 32(7), 2189-2202 (1996).
17. Sarma, P.B.S., Delleur, J. W. and Rao, A.R., "Comparison of rainfall-runoff models for urban areas," J. Hydrol. 18, 329-347(1973).
18. Seann Reed, Victor Koren, and Michael Smith et al., "Overall distributed model intercomparison project results," Journal of Hydrology. 298, 27-60 (2004).
19. S.L. NEITSCH, J.G. ARNOLD, J.R. KINIRY, et al. Soil and Water Assessment Tool User's Manual [M]. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas, 2002.
20. Teemu S. Kokkonen, Anthony J. Jakeman, "A comparison of metric and conceptual approaches in rainfall-runoff modeling and its implications," WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH. 37(9), 2345-2352 (2001).
21. Theresa M. Carpenter, Konstantine PGeorgakakos, "Intercomparison of lumped versus distributed hydrologie model ensemble simulations on operational for ecast scales" Journal of Hydrology. 329, 174- 185 (2006).
22. Thian Yew Gan, Enoch M. Dlamini, and Getu Fana Biftu, "Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologie modeling," Journal of Hydrology. 192, 81-103 (1997).
23. V, KLEMES, "Operational testing of hydrological simulation models," Hydrological Sciences Journal - des Sciences Hydrologiques, 31 ( 1 ), 13-24 ( 1986).
24. Vijay P. Singh, FASCE, and David A. Woolhiser et al., "Mathematical Modeling of Watershed Hydrology," JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING. 7(4), 270-292 (2002).
25. W. Ye, B. C. Bates, N. R. Viney, "Performance of conceptual rainfall-runoff models in low-yielding ephemeral catchments," WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH. 33(1), 153-166 (1997).
26. World Meteorological Organization (WMO), "Intercomparison of Conceptual Models used in Operational Hydrological Forecasting," Operational Hydrology Report 7, WMO, Geneva, (1975).
27. World Meteorological Organization (WMO), "Intercomparison of Models for Snowmelt Runoff," Operational Hydrology Report 23, WMO, Geneva, (1986).
28. World Meteorological Organization (WMO), "Simulated Real-Time Intercomparison of Hydrological Models," Operational Hydrology Report 38, WMO, Geneva, (1992).
29. Liang X., D. P. Lettenmaier, E. F. Wood, and S. J. Burges, "A Simple hydrologically Based Model of Land Surface Water and Energy Fluxes for GSMs," J. Geophys. Res. 99(14), 415-428 (1994).