Impact of image segmentation on high-content screening data quality for SK-BR-3 cells

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 8, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Hill, Andrew A ^a   LaPan, Peter ^a   Li, Yizheng ^a   Haney, Steve ^a  

^a PFIZER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION; AUTOMATED MICROSCOPY; CELLULAR SIGNALLING; CELLULAR STRUCTURE; HIGH-CONTENT SCREENING; MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES; MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES; SEGMENTATION ALGORITHMS;

CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); ERRORS; MORPHOLOGY;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

DNA;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CANCER CELL; CELL HETEROGENEITY; CELL SCREENING; CELL STRUCTURE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA CONTENT; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; HIGH CONTENT SCREENING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; CELL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; TUMOR CELL LINE;

CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELLS; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 36248952691     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-340     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Benson JD Chen YN Cornell-Kennon SA Dorsch M Kim S Leszczyniecka M Sellers WR Lengauer C Validating cancer drug targets. [Review] [57 refs] Nature 441(7092):451-456. 10.1038/nature04873 16724057
2. Bergman I Barmada MA Griffin JA Slamon DJ Treatment of meningeal breast cancer xenografts in the rat using an anti-p185/HER2 antibody Clinical Cancer Research 2001, 7(7):2050-2056. 11448923
3. De Lorenzo C Palmer DB Piccoli R Ritter MA D'Alessio G A new human antitumor immunoreagent specific for ErbB2 Clinical Cancer Research 2002, 8(6):1710-1719. 12060608
4. Lee S Yang W Lan KH Sellappan S Klos K Hortobagyi G Hung MC Yu D Enhanced sensitization to taxol-induced apoptosis by herceptin pretreatment in ErbB2-overexpressing breast cancer cells Cancer Res 2002, 62(20):5703-5710. 12384528
5. Giuliano KA DeBiasio RL Dunlay RT Gough A Volosky JM Zock J Pavlakis GN Taylor DL High-Content Screening: A New Approach to Easing Key Bottlenecks in the Drug Discovery Process J Biomol Screen 1997, 2(4):249-259. 10.1177/108705719700200410
6. Perlman ZE Slack MD Feng Y Mitchison TJ Wu LF Altschuler SJ Multidimensional drug profiling by automated microscopy Science 2004, 306(5699):1194-1198. 10.1126/science.1100709 15539606
7. Pelkmans L Fava E Grabner H Hannus M Habermann B Krausz E Zerial M Genome-wide analysis of human kinases in clathrin- and caveolae/ raft-mediated endocytosis Nature 2005, 436:78-86. 10.1038/nature03571 15889048
8. Tanaka M Bateman R Rauh D Vaisberg E Ramachandani S Zhang C Hansen KC Burlingame AL Trautman JK Shokat KM Adams CL An Unbiased Cell Morphology-Based Screen for New, Biologically Active Small Molecules PLoS Biology 2005, 3(5):e128. 1073692 15799708 10.1371/ journal.pbio.0030128
9. Zhou X Cao X Perlman Z Wong ST A computerized cellular imaging system for high content analysis in Monastrol suppressor screens J Biomed Inform 2006, 39(2):115-125. 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.05.008 16011909
10. Rausch O High content cellular screening Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2006, 10(4):316-320. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.06.004 16793326
11. Gonzalez RC Woods RE Digital Image Processing Addison-Wesley First 1992
12. Cellomics Morphology Explorer BioApplication Guide Pittsburgh, PA 2004
13. Zar JH Biostatistical Analysis Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Simon & Shuster 4th 1999.