Hind limb ischemia in rabbit model: T2-prepared versus time-of-flight MR angiography at 3 T

Radiology

Volumn 245, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 761-769

  Korosoglou, Grigorios ^a,d   Gilson, Wesley D ^a   Schär, Michael ^a,b   Ustun, Ali ^a   Hofmann, Lawrence V ^c   Kraitchman, Dara L ^a   Stuber, Matthias ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIATRIZOATE;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; COLLATERAL CIRCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HINDLIMB; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG BLOOD FLOW; LIMB ISCHEMIA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY; TIME OF FLIGHT MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; HINDLIMB; ISCHEMIA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; RABBITS;

EID: 36248945164     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2452062067     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ouriel K. Peripheral arterial disease. Lancet 2001;358:1257-1264.
2. Luther M, Lepantalo M, Alback A, Matzke S. Amputation rates as a measure of vascular surgical results. Br J Surg 1990;83:241-244.
3. Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Holland GA, Barker CF. Peripheral vascular surgery with magnetic resonance angiography as the sole preoperative imaging modality. J Vasc Surg 1994;20:861-869.
4. Mulligan SA, Matsuda T, Lanzer P, et al. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of MR angiography and color duplex US with conventional angiography. Radiology 1991;178:695-700.
5. Kraitchman DL, Tatsumi M, Gilson WD, et al. Dynamic imaging of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells trafficking to myocardial infarction. Circulation 2005;112:1451-1461.
6. Tateishi-Yuyama E, Matsubara H, Murohara T, et al. Therapeutic angiogenesis for patients with limb ischaemia by autologous transplantation of bone-marrow cells: a pilot study and a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002;300:427-435.
7. Koelemay MJ, Lijmer JG, Stoker J, Legemate DA, Bossuyt PM. Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2001;285:1338-1345.
8. McCauley TR, Monib A, Dickey KW, et al. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: accuracy and reliability of time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1994;192:351-357.
9. Tatli S, Lipton MJ, Davison BD, Skorstad RB, Yucel EK. From the RSNA refresher courses: MR imaging of aortic and peripheral vascular disease. RadioGraphics 2003;23(spec no):S59-S78.
10. Doerfler A, Becker WP, Wanke I, et al. A novel flexible, retrievable endovascular stent system for small-vessel anatomy; preliminary in vivo data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:862-868.
11. Kodama T, Watanabe K. Influence of imaging parameters, flow volocily, and pulsatile flow on three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography: experimental studies. Eur J Radiol 1997;26:83-91.
12. Wright GA, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Flow-independent magnetic resonance projection angiography. Magn Reson Med 1991; 17:126-140.
13. Brittain JH, Hu BS, Wright GA, Meyer CH, Macovski A, Nishimura DG. Coronary angiography with magnetization-prepared T2 contrast. Magn Reson Med 1993;33:689-696.
14. Botnar RM, Stuber M, Danias PG, Kissinger KV, Manning WJ. Improved coronary artery definition with T2-weighted, free-breathing, three-dimensional coronary MRA. Circulation 1999;99:3139-3148.
15. Nezafat R, Stuber M, Ouwerkerk R, Gharib AM, Desai MY, Pettigrew RI. B1-insensitive T2 preparation for improved coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:858-864.
16. Liddell RP, Patel TH, Weiss CR, et al. Endovascular model of rabbit hindlimb ischemia: a platform to evaluate therapeutic angiogenesis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005;16:991-998.
17. Fischer SE, Wickline SA, Lorenz CH. Novel real-time R-wave detection algorithm based on the vectorcardiogram for accurate gated magnetic resonance acquisitions. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:361-370.
18. Harrison R, Bronskill MJ, Henkelman RM. Magnetization transfer and T2 relaxation components in tissue. Magn Reson Med 1095;33:490-496.
19. Garwood M, DelaBarre L. The return of the frequency sweep: designing adiabetic pulses for contemporary NMR. J Magn Reson 2001; 153:155-177.
20. Longland CJ. The collateral circulation of the limb: Arris and Gale lecture delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons of England on 4th February, 1953. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1953; 13:161-176.
21. Etienne A, Botnar RM, Van Muiswinkel AM, Boesiger P, Manning WJ, Stuber M. "Soap-bubble" visualization and quantitative analysis of 3D coronary magnetic resonance angiograms. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:658-666.
22. Mantel N, Fleiss JL. The equivalence of the generalized McNemar tests for marginal homogeneity in 2(3) and 3(2) tables. Biometrics 1975;31:727-729.
23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1: 307-310.
24. Tousoulis D, Xenakis C, Tentolouris C, et al. Effects of vitamin C on intracoronary L-arginine dependent coronary vasodilatation in patients with stable angina. Heart 2005;91: 1319-1323.
25. Labropoulos N, Leon LR Jr, Bhatti A, et al. Hemodynamic effects of intermittent pneumatic compression in patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:710-716.
26. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999;211:59-67.
27. Leiner T. Magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal and lower extremity vasculature. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2005;16: 21-66.
28. Bonk RT, Schmiedl UP, Yuan C, Nelson JA, Black CD, Ladd DL. Time-of-flight MR angiography with Gd-DTPA hexamethylene diamine co-polymer blood pool contrast agent: comparison of enhanced MRA and conventional angiography for arterial stenosis induced in rabbits. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:638-646.
29. Leiner T, de Vries M, Hoogeveen R, Vasbinder GB, Lemaire K, van Engelshoven JM. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography at. 3.0 tesla: initial experience with a whole-body scanner in healthy volunteers, J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:609-614.
30. Allkemper T, Heindel W, Kooijman H, Ebert W, Tombach B. Effect of field strengths on magnetic resonance angiography: comparison of an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide blood-pool contrast agent and gadopentetate dimeglumine in rabbits at 1.5 and 3.0 tesla. Invest Radiol 2006;41:97-104.
31. Paetsch T, Jahnke C, Barkhausen J, et al. Detection of coronary stenoses with contrast enhanced, three-dimensional free breathing coronary MR angiography using the gadolinium-based intravascular contrast agent gadocoletic acid (B-22956). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8:509-516.
32. Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Chan MR, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology 2007; 243:148-157.
33. Ding X, Tkach JA, Ruggieri PR, Masaryk TJ. Sequential three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography of the carotid arteries: value of variable excitation and postprocessing in reducing Venetian blind artifact. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:683-688.
34. Saloner D, Selby K, Anderson CM. MRA studies of arterial stenosis: improvements by diastolic acquisition. Magn Reson Med 1994; 31:196-203.