Hits and false positives in face matching: A familiarity-based dissociation

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 69, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1175-1184

  Megreya, Ahmed M ^a   Mike Burton, A ^b  

^a MENOUFIA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148947530     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193954     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. BRUCE, V. (1986). Influences of familiarity on the processing of faces. Perception, 15, 387-397.
2. BRUCE, V., BURTON, A. M., & DENCH, N. (1994). What's distinctive about a distinctive face? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 119-141.
3. BRUCE, V., HENDERSON, Z., GREENWOOD, K., HANCOCK, P. J. B., BURTON, A. M., & MILLER, P. (1999). Verification of face identities from images captured on video. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 339-360.
4. BRUCE, V., HENDERSON, Z., NEWMAN, C., & BURTON, A. M. (2001). Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 207-218.
5. BRUCE, V., & YOUNG, A. W. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
6. BURTON, A. M., BRUCE, V., & HANCOCK, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: A model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 1-31.
7. BURTON, A. M., JENKINS, R., HANCOCK, P. J. B., & WHITE, D. (2005). Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 256-284.
8. BURTON, A. M., WILSON, S., COWAN, M., & BRUCE, V. (1999). Face recognition in poor-quality video: Evidence from security surveillance. Psychological Science, 10, 243-248.
9. CLARK, S. E., & DAVEY, S. L. (2005). The target-to-foils shift in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Law & Human Behavior, 29, 151-172.
10. CRISS, A. H., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (2004). Interactions between study task, study time, and the low-frequency hit rate advantage in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 778-786.
11. DEFFENBACHER, K. A., JOHANSON, J., VETTER, T., & O'TOOLE, A. J. (2000). The face typicality-recognizability relationship: Encoding or retrieval locus? Memory & Cognition, 28, 1173-1182.
12. DE GELDER, B., & ROUW, R. (2000). Paradoxical configuration effects for faces and objects in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1271-1279.
13. FARAH, M. J., WILSON, K. D., DRAIN, H. M., & TANAKA, J. R. (1995). The inverted faces inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms. Vision Research, 35, 2089-2093.
14. GLANZER, M., & ADAMS, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20.
15. GLANZER, M., & ADAMS, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 5-16.
16. GLANZER, M., ADAMS, J. K., IVERSON, G. J., & KIM, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546-567.
17. HANCOCK, P. J. B., BRUCE, V., & BURTON, A. M. (2000). Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 330-337.
18. HANCOCK, P. J. B., BURTON, A. M., & BRUCE, V. (1996). Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis. Memory & Cognition, 24, 26-40.
19. HAXBY, J. V., UNGERLEIDER, L. G., CLARK, V. P., SCHOUTEN, J. L., HOFFMAN, E. A., & MARTIN, A. (1999). The effects of face inversion on activity in human neural system for face and object perception. Neuron, 22, 189-199.
20. HENDERSON, Z., BRUCE, V., & BURTON, A. M. (2001). Matching the faces of robbers captured on video. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 445-464.
21. HOCKLEY, W. E., HEMSWORTH, D. H., & CONSOLI, A. (1999). Shades of the mirror effect: Recognition of faces with and without sunglasses. Memory & Cognition, 27, 128-138.
22. JOORDENS, S., & HOCKLEY, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1534-1555.
23. KEMP, R., TOWELL, N., & PIKE, G. (1997). When seeing should not be believing: Photographs, credit cards and fraud. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 211-222.
24. KLATZKY, R. L., & FORREST, F. H. (1984). Recognizing familiar and unfamiliar faces. Memory & Cognition, 12, 60-70.
25. LEWIS, M. B., & JOHNSTON, R. A. (1997). Familiarity, target set, and false positives in face recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 437-459.
26. LIU, C H., SEETZEN, H., BURTON, A. M., & CHAUDHURI, A. (2003). Face recognition is robust with incongruent image resolution: Relationship to security video images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 33-41.
27. MADDOX, W. T., & ESTES, W. K. (1997). Direct and indirect stimulus-frequency effects in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 539-559.
28. MALMBERG, K. J., & NELSON, T. O. (2003). The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 31, 35-43.
29. MALONE, D. R., MORRIS, H. H., KAY, M. C., & LEVIN, H. S. (1982). Prosopagnosia: A double dissociation between the recognition of familiar and unfamiliar faces. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 45, 820-822.
30. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & CHAPPELL, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105, 724-760.
31. MEGREYA, A. M., & BURTON, A. M. (2006a). Recognising faces seen alone or with others: When two heads are worse than one. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 957-972.
32. MEGREYA, A. M., & BURTON, A. M. (2006b). Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task. Memory & Cognition, 34, 865-876.
33. MOSCOVITCH, M., WINOCUR, G., & BEHRMANN, M. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 555-604.
34. NELSON, A. N., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (2005, November). The effects of experience on perception and memory. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Toronto.
35. O'TOOLE, A. J., DEFFENBACHER, K. A., VALENTIN, D., & ABDI, H. (1994) Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory & Cognition, 22, 208-224.
36. REDER, L. M., ANGSTADT, P., CARY, M., ERICKSON, M. A., & AYERS, M. S. (2002). A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: Two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 28, 138-152.
37. REDER, L. M., NHOUYVANISVONG, A., SCHUNN, C. D., AYERS, M. S., ANGSTADT, P., & HIRAKI, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 294-320.
38. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & STEYVERS, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-166.
39. SIKSTRÖM, S. (2004). The variance reaction time model. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 371-421.
40. VOKEY, J. R., & READ, J. D. (1992). Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces. Memory & Cognition, 20, 291-302.
41. WELLS, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 553-571.
42. YIN, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.
43. YOUNG, A. W., HAY, D. C., MCWEENY, K. H., FLUDE, B. M., & ELLIS, A. W. (1985). Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception, 14, 737-746.
44. YOUNG, A. W., NEWCOMBE, F., DE HAAN, E. H. E, SMALL, M., & HAY, D. C. (1993). Face perception after brain injury: Selective impairments affecting identity and expression. Brain, 116, 941-959.