Population genetics and conservation of the threatened southeastern beach mouse (Peromyscus polionotus niveiventris): Subspecies and evolutionary units

Conservation Genetics

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1441-1452

  Degner, Jacob F ^a   Stout, I Jack ^a   Roth, James D ^a   Parkinson, Christopher L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biogeography; Endangered species; Evolutionarily significant units; Management units; Microsatellites; Peromyscus polionotus niveiventris

Indexed keywords

ALLOPATRY; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BEACH; DIVERGENCE; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT; EVOLUTION; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC MARKER; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PLEISTOCENE; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION STRUCTURE; RODENT; SEA LEVEL CHANGE; SPECIES CONSERVATION; ZOOGEOGRAPHY;

CAPE CANAVERAL; FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; SMYRNA DUNES PARK; UNITED STATES;

PEROMYSCUS; PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS; PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS NIVEIVENTRIS; PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS RHOADSI; RODENTIA; SMYRNA;

EID: 36148940234     PISSN: 15660621     EISSN: 15729737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-007-9295-1     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bradley RD, Baker RJ (2001) A test of the genetic species concept: cytochrome-b sequences and mammals. J Mammal 84:960-973
2. Bradley RD, Baker RJ (2006) Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. J Mammal 87:643-662-973
3. Brunhoff C, Galbreath K, Fedorov V, Cook J, Jaarola M. (2003) Holarctic phylogeography of the root vole (Microtus oeconomus): implications for late Quaternary biogeography of high latitudes. Mol Ecol 12:957-968
4. Burbrink FT, Lawson R, Slowinski JB (2000) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the polytypic North American Rat Snake (Elaphe obsoleta): a critique of the subspecies concept. Evolution 54:2101-2118
5. Chapman FM (1889) Description of two new species of the genus Hesperomys from Florida. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 2:117
6. Chirhart SE, Honeycutt RL, Greenbaum IF (2000) Microsatellite markers for the deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus. Mol Ecol 9:1669
7. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall K (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657-1660
8. Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM, Wayne RK (2000) Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 15:290-295
9. Dimmick W, Ghedotti M, Grose M, Maglia A, Meinhardt D, Pennock D (1999) The importance of systematic biology in defining units of conservation. Conserv Biol 13:653-660
10. Ehrhart LM (1978) Pallid Beach Mouse. In: Layne JN (ed) Rare and endangered biota of Florida. University Presses of Florida, Gainsville, Florida
11. El Mousadik A, Petit RJ (1996) High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco. Theor Appl Genet 92:832-839
12. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611
13. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
14. Fraser DJ, Bernatchez L (2001) Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol Ecol 10:2741-2752
15. Fritz U, Siroky P, Kami H, Wink M (2005) Environmentally caused dwarfism or a valid species- is Testudo weissingeri Bour, 1996 a distinct evolutionary lineage? New evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear genomic markers. Mol Phylogenet Evol 37:389-401
16. Gentry J, Smith M (1968) Food habits and burrow associates of Peromyscus polionotus. J Mammal 49:562-565
17. Gompert Z, Nice C, Fordyce J, Forister M, Shapiro A (2006) Identifying units for conservation using molecular systematics: the cautionary tale of the Karner blue butterfly. Mol Ecol 15:1759-1768
18. Goudet. J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485-486
19. Hadley NF, Schultz TD, Savill AC (1988) Spectral reflectances of three subspecies of the tiger beetle Neocicindela perhispida: correlations with their respective habitat substrates. N Z J Zool 15:343-346
20. Hall ER (1981) The mammals of North America, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York
21. Herron DH, Castoe TA, Parkinson CL (2004) Sciurid phylogeny and the paraphyly of Holarctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus). Mol Phylogenet Evol 31:1015-1030
22. Hoekstra HE, Krenz J (2005) Local adaptation in the rock pocket mouse (Chaetodipus intermedius): natural selection and phylogenetic history of populations. Heredity 94:217-228
23. Hoekstra HE, Hirschmann RJ, Bundey RA, Insel PA, Crossland JP (2006) A single amino acid mutation contributes to adaptive beach mouse color pattern. Science 313:101-104
24. Hoffman E, Blouin M (2000) A review of colour and pattern polymorphisms in anurans. Biol J Linn Soc, 70:633-665
25. Hoffman E, Schueler F, Jones A, Blouin M (2006) An analysis of selection on a colour polymorphism in the northern leopard frog. Mol Ecol 15:2627-2641
26. Humphrey SR, Barbour DB (1981) Status and habitat of three subspecies of beach mice in Florida. J Mammal 68:297-304
27. Humphrey SR (1992) Pallid Beach Mouse. In: Humphrey SR (ed) Rare and endangered biota of Florida Vol. 1.: Mammals. University Presses of Florida, Gainsville, Florida
28. Jaarola M, Searle B (2002) Phylogeography of field voles (Microtus agrestis) in Eurasia inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Ecol 11:2613-2621
29. Jensen JL, Bohonak AJ, Kelly ST (2005) Isolation by distance web service. BMC Genetics. 6:13
30. Kettlewell H (1955) Selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity 9:323-342
31. Kettlewell H (1956) Further selection experiments on industrial melansim in the Lepidoptera. Heredity 10:287-301
32. Kizirian D, Donnelly M (2004) The criterion of reciprocal monophyly and classification of nested diversity at the species level. Mol Phylogenet Evol 32:1072-1076
33. Lessa E, Cook J (1998) The molecular phylogenetics of Tuco-Tucos (genus Ctenomys, Rodentia:Octodontidae) suggests an early burst of speciation. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9:88-99
34. Moritz C (1994) Defining 'evolutionarily significant units' for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9:373-375
35. Moritz C (2002) Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Syst Biol 51:238-254
36. O'Hara R (2005) Comparing the effects of genetic drift and fluctuating selection on genotype frequency changes in the scarlet tiger moth. P Roy Soc Lond Bio 272:211-217
37. Olendorf R, Rodd F, Punzalan D, Houde A, Hurt C, Reznick D, Hughes K (2006) Frequency dependent survival in natural guppy populations. Nature 441:633-636
38. Osgood WH (1909) A revision of the mice of the American genus Peromyscus. N Am Fauna 28:1-28
39. Paetkau D (1999) Using genetics to identify intraspecific conservation units: a critique of current methods. Conserv Biol 13:1507
40. Pennock D, Dimmick W (1997) Critique of the evolutionarily significany unit as a definition for "distinct population segment" under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conserv Biol 11:611-619
41. Prince KL, Glenn TC, Dewey MJ. (2002) Cross-species amplification among peromyscines of new microsatellite DNA loci from the oldfield mouse (Peromyscus polionotus subgriseus). Mol Ecol 2:133-136
42. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959
43. Posada D, Crandall KA, 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818
44. Posada D, Crandall KA, 2001. Selecting the best-Wt model of nucleotide substitution. Syst Biol 50:580-601
45. Rader RB, Belk MC, Shiozawa DK, Crandall KA (2005) Empirical tests for ecological exchangeability. Anim Conserv 8:239-247
46. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) genepop (Web version, 2005) Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248-249
47. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574
48. Ryder OA (1986) Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends Ecol Evol 1:9-10
49. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2005) arlequin v. 3.0: Documentation and program. Genetics and biometry laboratory, Univerersity of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
50. Smith M, Patton J (1993) The diversification of South American murid rodents: evidence from mitochondrial sequence data for the akodontine tribe. Biol J Linn Soc 50:149-177
51. Spielman D, Brook BW, Frankham R (2004) Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 101:15261-15264
52. Stout IJ (1992) Peromyscus polionotus niveiventris. In: Humphrey SR (eds) Rare and endangered biota of Florida. 2nd edn. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
53. Swilling W, Wooten M (2002) Subadult dispersal in a monogamous species: the Alabama Beach Mouse (Peromyscus polionotus ammobates). J Mammal 83:252-259
54. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4.0b10 Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
55. Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619-633
56. US Fish and Wildlife Service (1993) Recovery plan for the Anastasia Island and Southeastern Beach Mouse. USFWS, Atlanta, Georgia, p. 30
57. Van Zant JL (2006) Molecular ecology of Peromyscus polionotus. Dissertation, Auburn University
58. Webb SD (1990) Historical biogeography. In: Myers RL Ewel JJ (eds) Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando, Florida
59. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) 1984 Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370
60. Wooten MC, Scribner KT, Krehling JT (1999) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from the endangered beach mouse Peromyscus polionotus. Mol Ecol 8:157-168