Social desirability and social utility: Two evaluative dimensions of personality traits;Désirabilité sociale et utilité sociale, deux dimensions de la valeur communiquée par les adjectifs de personnalité

Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale

Volumn 19, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 125-151

  Cambon, Laurent ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CÔTE D'AZUR   (France)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Person perception; Social desirability; Social utility

Indexed keywords

EID: 36049025416     PISSN: 0992986X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alliot, L., Le Marc, M., & Lafon, J.C. (2005). Déterminants sociaux des perceptions intergroupes en milieu hospitalier: contribution à une psychologie sociétale. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 65, 45-57.
2. Ashmore, R.D. (1981). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. In D.L Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
3. Baeyens, F., Vansteenwegen, D., Hermans, D., & Eelen, P. (2001). Chilled white wine, when all of a sudden the doorbell rings: mere reference and evaluation versus expectancy and preparation in human pavlovian learning. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in Psychology Research (vol. 4, pp. 241-277), Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
4. Beauvois, J.L. (1995). La connaissance des utilités sociales. Psychologie française, 40, 375-388.
5. Beauvois, J.L. (2003). Judgment norms, social utility, and individualism. In N. Dubois (Ed.), A sociocognitive approach to social norms. London: Routledge.
6. Beauvois, J.L., Dubois, N. & Peeters, G. (1999). L'évaluation personnologique. In J.L. Beauvois, N. Dubois & W. Doise (Eds.), La construction sociale de la personne. Grenoble: PUG.
7. Bornstein, R.F. (1989). Exposure and affect: overview and meta-analysis of research, 1961-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289.
8. Bornstein, R.F. (1992). Subliminal mere exposure effects. In R. Bornstein & T.S. Pittman (Eds.), Perception without awareness. New York: The Guilford Press.
9. Bornstein, R.F. & D'Agostino, P.R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary test of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103-128.
10. Cambon L. (2004) La désirabilité sociale et l'utilité sociale des professions et des professionnels. In J.L. Beauvois, R.V. Joule, & J.M. Monteil Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales (vol. 9). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
11. Cambon, L. (2006). La fonction evaluative de la personnologie, vers la mise en évidence de deux dimensions de la valeur: la dé sirabilité sociale et l'utilité sociale. Psychologie française, 51, 285-305.
12. Cambon, L., Djouary, A.Z., Beauvois, J.L.(2006). Social Judgment Norms and Social Utility: when it is more valuable to be useful than desirable. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 167-180.
13. Christopher, A.N. & Schlenker, B.R. (2004). Materialism and affect: The role of self-presentational concerns. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 260-272.
14. Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M.T. & Mount, L. (1996). Status, communality and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25-38.
15. De Houwer, J., Thomas, S. & Baeyens, F. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853-869.
16. De Montmollin, M. (1972). Les psychopitres. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
17. Devos-Comby, L. & Devos, T. (2000). Jugements de responsabilité et registres de connaissance. In J.-L. Beauvois, R.-V. Joule, & J.-M. Monteil (Eds.) Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales (vol. 7). Fribourg: DelVal.
18. Dittmar, H. & Pepper, L. (1994). To have is to be: Materialism and person perception in working-class and middle-class British adolescents. Journal of Economic Psychology, 15, 233-251.
19. Dubois N. & Beauvois, J.-L. - (2001) Désirabilité et utilité: deux composantes de la valeur des personnes dans l'évaluation sociale. Orientation scolaire et professionnelle, 30, 391-400.
20. Dubois N. & Beauvois, J.-L. - (2005). Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123-146.
21. Durand-Delvigne, A. (1997). Positions hiérarchiques, contextes professionnels et expressions du genre. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 2, 31-48.
22. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: a social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
23. Eagly, A.H. & Steffen, V.J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.
24. Fiske, S.T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 155-194.
25. Fiske S.T., Cuddy A.J.C., Glick P. & Xu J. - (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 6, 878-902.
26. Gallay, M. (1992). Composante évaluative et composante affective dans les processus personnologiques. Document non publié. Laboratoire de psychologie sociale, Université Grenoble II.
27. Judd, C., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V. & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913.
28. Kasser, T. & Ahuvia, A. (2002). Materialistic values and well-being in business students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 137-146.
29. Kim, M.P. & Rosenberg, S. (1980). Comparison of two structural models of implicit personality theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 375-389.
30. Le Barbanchon, E. & Milhabet, I. (2005). L'optimisme: réponse désirable et/ou socialement utile? Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 3, 153-181.
31. Leyens, J.-Ph., Yzerbyt, V. & Schadron, G. (1994). Stereotypes and social cognition. London: Sage.
32. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1997). Professions au masculin et au féminin: un moyen terme entre le masculin et le féminin ? Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 2, 135-152.
33. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. & Joye, D. (1988). Représentations sociales de catégories socioprofessionnelles: aspects méthodologiques. Bulletin de psychologie, 40, 377-390.
34. Monahan, J.L., Murphy, S.T. & Zajonc, R.B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: specific, general and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11, 462-466.
35. Osgood, C.E. (1962). Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. American Psychologist, 17, 10-28.
36. Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J. & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
37. Pansu, P. & Beauvois, J.L. (2004). Juger de la valeur sociale des personnes: les pratiques sociales d'évaluation. In P. Pansu & C. Louche (Eds.), La psychologie appliquée à l'analyse des problèmes sociaux. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
38. Peeters, G. (1986). Good and Evil as softwares of the brain: on psychological «immediates» underlying the metaphysical «ultimates». A contribution from cognitive social psychology and semantic differential research. Ultimate reality and meaning. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Philosophy of Understanding, 9, 210-231.
39. Peeters, G. (1992). Evaluative Meanings of Adjectives In vitro and In Context: Some Theoretical Implications and Practical Consequences of Positive-Negative Asymmetry and Behavioral-Adaptative Concepts of Evaluation. Psychologica Belgica, 32, 211-231.
40. Peeters, G. (1999). Valeur et évaluation. In J.L. Beauvois, N. Dubois & W. Doise (Eds.), La construction sociale de la personne. Grenoble: PUG.
41. Peeters, G. (2002). From good and bad to can and must: subjective necessity of acts associated with positively and negatively valued stimuli. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 125-136.
42. Rosenberg, S. & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of Implicit Personality Theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 6, pp. 235-297). New York: Academic Press.
43. Saucier, G. (2004). What is more replicable than the big five? Broader factors found in English-language personality adjectives. Manuscrit soumis.
44. Saucier, G. & Goldberg, L.R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality, 69, 847-879.
45. th ed. pp 391-445). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
46. Staat, C.K., & Staat, A.W. (1957). Meaning established by classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 74-80.
47. Tesser, A. & Martin, L. (1996). The psychology of evaluation. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology. Handbook of basic Principles. Londres: Guilford Press.
48. Testé, B. & Simon, K. (2005). Valeur affective et utilité sociale des traits dans les stéréotypes de genre, le soi féminin et le soi masculin. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 3, 81-94.
49. Vonk, R. (1993). Individual Differences and Common Dimensions in Implicit Personality theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 209-226.
50. White, G.M. (1980). Conceptual universals in interpersonal language. American Anthropologist, 82, 759-781.
51. Wiggins, J.S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In W.M. Grove & D. Cicchetti (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology (vol. 2): Personality and psychopathology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
52. Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person and self-perception. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (vol. 16). London: Psychology Press.
53. Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R. & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 24(12), 1251-1263.
54. Zajonc, R.B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 9, 1-27.