Adverse events and discontinuations during 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 33, Issue 6 PART 1 OF 2, 2007, Pages 288-292

  Santodomingo Rubido, Jacinto ^a,b   Wolffsohn, James S ^a   Gilmartin, Bernard ^a  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MENICON CO LTD   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adverse events; Contact lenses; Continuous wear; Silicone hydrogel

Indexed keywords

SILICONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA INJURY; EXTENDED WEAR CONTACT LENS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; MALE; PAPILLARY CONJUNCTIVITIS; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; SAMPLE SIZE; SCREENING TEST; SOFT CONTACT LENS;

ADULT; CONJUNCTIVITIS; CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEAL DISEASES; EYE DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; INCIDENCE; MALE; PATIENT DROPOUTS; SILICONES;

EID: 36049019585     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318030c9b1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adams CP Jr, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR, et al. Corneal ulcers in patients with cosmetic extended-wear contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 1983;96:705-709.
2. Chalupa E, Swarbrick HA, Holden BA, et al. Severe corneal infections associated with contact lens wear. Ophthalmology 1987;94:17-22.
3. Schein OD, Glynn RJ, Seddon JM, et al. The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. N Engl J Med 1989;321:773-778.
4. Holden BA, Mertz GW. Critical oxygen levels to avoid corneal edema for daily and extended wear contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984;25:1161-1167.
5. Harvitt DM, Bonanno JA. Re-evaluation of the oxygen diffusion model for predicting minimum contact lens Dk/t values needed to avoid corneal anoxia. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:712-719.
6. Keay L, Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, et al. Microcyst response to high Dk/t silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:582-585.
7. Covey M, Sweeney DF, Terry R, et al. Hypoxic effects of high Dk soft contact lens wearers are negligible. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:95-99.
8. Nilsson SEG. Seven-day extended wear and 30-day continuous wear of high oxygen transmissibility soft silicone hydrogel contact lenses: A randomised 1-year study of 504 patients. CLAO J 2001;27:125-136.
9. Fonn D, MacDonald KE, Richter D, et al. The ocular response to extended wear of a high Dk silicone hydrogel contact lens. Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:176-182.
10. Morgan PB, Efron N, Hill EA, et al. Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:430-436.
11. Schein OD, McNally JJ, Katz J, et al. The incidence of microbial keratitis among wearers of a 30-day silicone hydrogel extended-wear contact lens. Ophthalmology 2005;112:2172-2179.
12. Morgan PB, Efron N, Maldonado-Codina C, et al. Adverse events and discontinuations with rigid and soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:528-535.
13. Stern J, Wong R, Naduvilath TJ, et al. Comparison of the performance of 6- or 30-night extended wear schedules with silicone hydrogel lenses over 3 years. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:398-406.
14. Brennan NA, Coles MLC, Comstock TL, et al. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon A (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1172-1177.
15. Holden BA, Stephenson A, Stretton S, et al. Superior arcuate lesions with soft contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:9-12.
16. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, et al. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:193-197.
17. Skotnitsky C, Naduvilath TJ, Sweeney DF, et al. Two presentations of contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) in hydrogel lens wear: Local and general. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:27-36.
18. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogel materials: How do they work? In: Sweeney DF, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000, pp 1-21.
19. Morgan PB, Efron N, Woods CA, et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2005. Contact Lens Spectrum 2006;21:35-39.
20. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Gilmartin B, Wolffsohn JS. Refractive and biometric changes with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:481-489.
21. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. Long-term changes in ocular physiology, tear film characteristics and symptomatology with silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:73-81.
22. Aasuri MK, Venkata N, Kumar VM. Differential diagnosis of microbial keratitis and contact lens-induced peripheral ulcer. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S60-S62.
23. Efron N, Morgan P, Hill EA, et al. The size, location, and clinical severity of corneal infiltrative events associated with contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:519-527.
24. Holden BA, Reddy MK, Sankaridurg PR, et al. Contact lens-induced peripheral ulcers with extended wear of disposable hydrogel lenses: Histopathologic observations on the nature and type of corneal infiltrate. Cornea 1999;18:538-543.
25. Grant T, Chong MS, Vajdic C. Contact lens induced peripheral ulcers during hydrogel contact lens wear. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 1998;24:145-151.
26. Holden BA, La Hood D, Grant T, et al. Gram-negative bacteria can induce contact lens related acute red eye (CLARE) responses. CLAO J 1996;22:47-52.
27. Sankaridurg PR, Vuppala N, Sreedharan A, et al. Gram negative bacteria and contact lens induced acute red eye. Indian J Ophthalmol 1996;44:29-32.
28. Henriques M, Sousa C, Lira M, et al. Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermis to silicone-hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:446-450.
29. Purslow C, Wolffsohn JS, Santodomingo-Rubido JS. The effect of contact lens wear on dynamic ocular surface temperature. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2005;28:29-35.
30. Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Covey M, et al. Clinical characterization of corneal infiltrative events with soft contact lens wear. Cornea 2003;22:435-442.
31. Daniels JT, Dart JK, Tuft SJ, et al. Corneal stem cells in review. Wound Repair Regen 2001;9:483-494.
32. Lopez-Alemany A, Compan V, Refojo MF. Porous structure of Pure-Vision versus Focus Night & Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. Applied Biomaterials 2002;63:319-325.
33. McNally JJ, Chalmers RL, McKenney CD, et al. Risk factors for corneal infiltrative events with 30-night continuous wear of silicone hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S153-S156.
34. Brennan NA, Coles ML. Extended wear in perspective. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:609-623.
35. 2 transmissible contact lenses on bacterial binding and corneal epithelium. Ophthalmology 2002;109:27-40.
36. Polse KA. Tear flow under hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979;18:409-413.
37. Douthwaite WA, Hough T, Edwards K, et al. The EyeSys videokeratoscopic assessment of apical radius and p-value in the normal human cornea. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999;19:467-474.
38. Dumbleton K, Fonn D, Jones L, et al. Severity and management of contact lens related complications with continuous wear of high-Dk silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:S216.