Refractive and biometric changes with silicone hydrogel contact lenses

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 481-489

  Santodomingo Rubido, Jacinto ^a,b   Gilmartin, Bernard ^a   Wolffsohn, James ^a  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Menicon Co Ltd   (Japan)

Author keywords

Contact lenses; Continuous wear; Myopia; Silicone hydrogels

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; HYDROGELS; REFRACTION; SILICONES; WEAR OF MATERIALS;

AXIAL LENGTH; BIOMETRY; MYOPIA;

CONTACT LENSES;

BIOMATERIAL; SILICONE;

ADULT; AGE; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER DEPTH; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEA FLATTENING; EXTENDED WEAR CONTACT LENS; EYE AXIS LENGTH; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; OCCUPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTION ERROR;

ADULT; ANTERIOR CHAMBER; BIOMETRY; CONTACT LENSES; CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; HYDROGELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MYOPIA; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; SILICONES;

EID: 21344444561     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000168561.57675.01     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Harris MG, Sarver MD, Polse KA. Corneal curvature and refractive error changesassociated with wearing hydrogel contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1975;52:313-9.
2. Grosvenor T. Changes in corneal curvature and subjective refraction of soft contact lens wearers. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1975;52: 405-13.
3. Barnett WA, Rengstorff RH. Adaptation to hydrogel contact lenses: variations in myopia and corneal curvature measurements. J Am Optom Assoc 1977;48:363-6.
4. Rengstorff RH. Changes in corneal curvature associated with contact lens wear. J Am Optom Assoc 1979;50:375-7.
5. McGlone V, Farkas B. Spherical refractive changes (myopia creep) secondary to hydrogel lens wear in the adult population. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68(suppl):73.
6. McGlone V, Farkas B. Refractive error changes in adult hydrogel contact lens wearers: low vs. medium water content and daily vs extended wear. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69(suppl):24.
7. Horner DG, Soni PS, Salmon TO, Swartz TS. Myopia progression in adolescent wearers of soft contact lenses and spectacles. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:474-9.
8. Fulk GW, Cyert LA, Parker DE, West RW. The effect of changing from glasses to soft contact lenses on myopia progression in adolescents. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2003;23:71-7.
9. Bullimore MA, Jones LA, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K, Payor RE. A retrospective study of myopia progression in adult contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:2110-3.
10. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogel materials: how do they work? In: Sweeney DF, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000:1-21.
11. MacDonald KE, Fonn D, Richter DB, Robboy M. Comparison of the physiological response to extended wear of an experimental high Dk soft lens versus a 38% HEMA lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:S310.
12. Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, Fonn D. Changes in myopic refractive error with nine months' extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76:845-9.
13. Fonn D, MacDonald KE, Richter D, Pritchard N. The ocular response to extended wear of a high Dk silicone hydrogel contact lens. Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:176-82.
14. Papas EB, Vajdic CM, Austen R, Holden BA. High-oxygen-transmissibility soft contact lenses do not induce limbal hyperaemia. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:942-8.
15. Keay L, Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Skotnitsky C, Holden BA. Microcyst response to high Dk/t silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:582-5.
16. Jalbert I, Stretton S, Naduvilath T, Holden B, Keay L, Sweeney D. Changes in myopia with low-Dk hydrogel and high-Dk silicone hydrogel extended wear. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:591-6.
17. Fonn D, du Toit, R, Simpson TL, Vega JA, Situ P, Chalmers RL. Sympathetic swelling response of the control eye to soft lenses in the other eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:3116-21.
18. Soni PS, Nguyen TT, Bonanno JA. Overnight orthokeratology: refractive and corneal recovery after discontinuation of reverse-geometry lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2004;30:254-62.
19. Haque S, Fonn D, Simpson T, Jones L. Corneal and epithelial thickness changes after 4 weeks of overnight corneal refractive therapy lens wear, measured with optical coherence tomography. Eye Contact Lens 2004;30:189-93.
20. Davies LN, Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:320-4.
21. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Mallen EA, Gilmartin B, Wolffsohn JS. A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:458-62.
22. Dave T, Ruston D, Fowler C. Evaluation of the EyeSys model II computerized videokeratoscope. Part II: the repeatability and accuracy in measuring convex aspheric surfaces. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75: 656-62.
23. Douthwaite WA, Hough T, Edwards K, Notay H. The EyeSys videokeratoscopic assessment of apical radius and p-value in the normal human cornea. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1999;19:467-74.
24. Goss DA, Jackson TW. Clinical findings before the onset of myopia in youth. I. Ocular optical components. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72: 870-8.
25. Ray WA, O'Day DM. Statistical analysis of multi-eye data in ophthalmic research. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:1186-8.
26. Wildsoet CF. Structural correlates of myopia. In: Rosenfield, M, Gilmartin B, eds. Myopia and Nearwork. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998:31-56.
27. Kinge B, Midelfart A, Jacobsen G, Rystad J. The influence of near-work on development of myopia among university students. A three-year longitudinal study among engineering students in Norway. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78:26-9.
28. Mallen EAH, Gilmartin B, Wolffsohn JS. Sympathetic innervation of ciliary muscle, refractive error and oculomotor function in young adults. Vis Res 2005;45:1641-51.
29. Walline JJ, Jones LA, Mutti DO, Zadnik K. A randomized trial of the effects of rigid contact lenses on myopia progression. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1760-6.
30. McBrien NA, Adams DW. A longitudinal investigation of adult-onset and adult-progression of myopia in an occupational group. Refractive and biometric findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38:321-33.
31. Kinge B, Midelfart A, Jacobsen G. Refractive errors among young adults and university students in Norway. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:692-5.
32. Grosvenor T. A longitudinal study of refractive changes between the ages of 20 and 40. Part 3: Statistical analysis. Optom Monthly 1977; 68:455-7.
33. Chiou GC. Review: effects of nitric oxide on eye diseases and their treatment. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2001;17:189-98.
34. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Gilmartin B, Wolffsohn JS. Drug-induced bilateral transient myopia with the sulphonamide sulphasalazine. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2003;23:567-70.
35. Hong X, Himebaugh N, Thibos LN. On-eye evaluation of optical performance of rigid and soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78: 872-80.
36. Mutti DO, Zadnik K, Fusaro RE, Friedman NE, Sholtz RI, Adams AJ. Optical and structural development of the crystalline lens in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:120-33.
37. Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Hussein M, Evorch D, Norton TT, Kurtz D, Leske MC, Manny R, Marsh-Tootle W, Scheiman M. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1492-500.
38. Gwiazda JE, Hyman L, Norton TT, Hussein ME, Marsh-Tootle W, Manny R, Wang Y, Everett D. Accommodation and related risk factors associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45: 2143-51.
39. Grosvenor T, Scott R. Three-year changes in refraction and its components in youth-onset and early adult-onset myopia. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:677-83.
40. Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Gonzalez-Perez J, Cervino A, Yebra-Pimentel E, Parafita MA. Changes in corneal structure with continuous wear of high-Dk soft contact lenses: a pilot study. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:440-6.
41. Holden BA, Stephenson A, Stretton S, Sankaridurg PR, O'Hare N, Jalbert I, Sweeney DF. Superior epithelial arcuate lesions with soft contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:9-12.
42. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:193-7.
43. Carney LG, Mainstone JC, Henderson BA. Corneal topography and myopia. A cross-sectional study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38: 311-20.
44. Horner DG, Soni PS, Vyas N, Himebaugh NL. Longitudinal changes in corneal asphericity in myopia. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77: 198-203.
45. Rengstorff RH, Nilsson KT. Long-term effects of extended wear lenses: changes in refraction, corneal curvature, and visual acuity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985;62:66-8.
46. Andreo LK. Long-term effects of hydrophilic contact lenses on myopia. Ann Ophthalmol 1990;22:224-9.
47. Pence NA. Effect of contact lenses on myopic progression in 24-39 years-olds. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69(suppl):72.
48. Sweeney DF, Keay L, Jalbert I, Sankaridurg PR, Holden BA, Skotnitsky C, Stephensen A, Covey M, Rao GN Clinical performance of silicone hydrogel lenses. In: Sweeney DF, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000:90-149.