Changes in ocular physiology, tear film characteristics, and symptomatology with 18 months silicone hydrogel contact lens wear

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 73-81

  Santodomingo Rubido, Jacinto ^a,b   Wolffsohn, James S ^a   Gilmartin, Bernard ^a  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MENICON CO LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

Contact lenses; Continuous wear; Ocular physiology; Silicone hydrogels; Symptoms; Tear film

Indexed keywords

CONTINUOUS WEAR; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGY; SILICONE HYDROGELS; SYMPTOMS; TEAR FILM;

CONTACT LENSES; INTRAOCULAR LENSES; SILICONES; VISION;

PHYSIOLOGY;

SILICONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; EVALUATION; EYE; EYELID; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEAR FILM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR; CORNEA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; MALE; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REFERENCE VALUES; SILICONES; TEARS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33644617061     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000200681.23663.48     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Holden BA. The Glenn A Fry Award lecture 1988: the ocular response to contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66:717-33.
2. Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, Schnider CM, Efron N. Short-term physiologic response in neophyte subjects fitted with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:911-21.
3. Stern J, Wong R, Naduvilath TJ, Stretton S, Holden BA, Sweeney DF. Comparison of the performance of 6- or 30-night extended wear schedules with silicone hydrogel lenses over 3 years. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:398-406.
4. Aakre BM, Ystenaes AE, Doughty MJ, Austrheim O, Westerfjell B, Lie MT. A 6-month follow-up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high-Dk silicone-hydrogel lenses. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2004;24:130-41.
5. Morgan PB, Efron N. Comparative clinical performance of two silicone hydrogel contact lenses for continuous wear. Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:183-92.
6. Fonn D, MacDonald KE, Richter D, Pritchard N. The ocular response to extended wear of a high Dk silicone hydrogel contact lens. Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:176-82.
7. Nilsson SE. Seven-day extended wear and 30-day continuous wear of high oxygen transmissibility soft silicone hydrogel contact lenses: a randomized 1-year study of 504 patients. CLAO J 2001;27:125-36.
8. Brennan NA, Coles ML, Comstock TL, Levy B. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1172-7.
9. Morgan PB, Efron N, Hill EA, Raynor MK, Whiting MA, Tullo AB. Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:430-6.
10. Holden BA, Mertz GW. Critical oxygen levels to avoid corneal edema for daily and extended wear contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984;25:1161-7.
11. Harvitt DM, Bonanno JA. Re-evaluation of the oxygen diffusion model for predicting minimum contact lens Dk/t values needed to avoid corneal anoxia. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:712-9.
12. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:193-7.
13. Holden BA, Stephenson A, Stretton S, Sankaridurg PR, O'Hare N, Jalbert I, Sweeney DF. Superior epithelial arcuate lesions with soft contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:9-12.
14. Morgan PB, Efron N, Woods CA, Jones D, Tranoudis I, Itoi M, Van Der Worp E, Heilend M, Hong AYC, Barr JT. International contact lens prescribing in 2004. Contact Lens Spectrum 2005;20:34-7.
15. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Gilmartin B, Wolffsohn J. Refractive and biometric changes with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:481-9.
16. Efron N. Efron grading scales for contact lens complications. In: Efron N, ed. Contact Lens Complications. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinnemann; 2004:239-43.
17. Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:422-32.
18. Wolffsohn JS, Purslow C. Clinical monitoring of ocular physiology using digital image analysis. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2003;26:27-35.
19. Guillon JP, Guillon M. Tear film examination of the contact lens patient. Optician 1993;206:21-9.
20. du Toit R, Pritchard N, Heffernan S, Simpson T, Fonn D. A comparison of three different scales for rating contact lens handling. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:313-20.
21. Armstrong RA, Slade SV, Eperjesi F. An introduction to analysis of variance (ANOVA) with special reference to data from clinical experiments in optometry. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2000;20:235-41.
22. Ray WA, O'Day DM. Statistical analysis of multi-eye data in ophthalmic research. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:1186-8.
23. Jones L, Jones D, Houlford M. Clinical comparison of three polyhexanide-preserved multi-purpose contact lens solutions. Contact Lens Ant Eye 1997;20:23-30.
24. Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:753-61.
25. Pritchard N, Jones L, Dumbleton K, Fonn D. Epithelial inclusions in association with mucin ball development in high-oxygen permeability hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:68-72.
26. Cho P, Yap M. The effects of contact lens wear on the precorneal tear film of Chinese eyes. J BCLA 1995;18:87-94.
27. Chui WS, Cho P, Brown B. Soft contact lens wear in Hong Kong-Chinese: predicting success. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2000;20:480-6.
28. Guillon M, Styles E, Guillon JP, Maissa C. Preocular tear film characteristics of nonwearers and soft contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:273-9.
29. du Toit R, Situ P, Simpson T, Fonn D. The effects of six months of contact lens wear on the tear film, ocular surfaces, and symptoms of presbyopes. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:455-62.
30. Faber E, Golding TR, Lowe R, Brennan NA. Effect of hydrogel lens wear on tear film stability. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:380-4.
31. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogel materials: how do they work? In: Sweeney DF, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000:1-21.
32. Doughty MJ, Laiquzzaman M, Button NF. Video-assessment of tear meniscus height in elderly Caucasians and its relationship to the exposed ocular surface. Curr Eye Res 2001;22:420-6.
33. Doughty MJ, Laiquzzaman M, Oblak E, Button N. The tear (lacrimal) meniscus height in human eyes: a useful clinical measure or an unusable variable sign? Contact Lens Ant Eye 2002;25:57-65.
34. Kwong YM, Cho P. Tear meniscus height in normal and dry eyes: evaluation using the TOPCON IMAGEnet System. Optom Today 2001;41:28-31.
35. Miller WL, Doughty MJ, Narayanan S, Leach NE, Tran A, Gaume AL, Bergmanson JP. A comparison of tear volume (by tear meniscus height and phenol red thread test) and tear fluid osmolality measures in non-lens wearers and in contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens 2004;30:132-7.
36. Fonn D, du Toit R, Simpson TL, Vega JA, Situ P, Chalmers RL. Sympathetic swelling response of the control eye to soft lenses in the other eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:3116-21.
37. Morgan PB, Efron N. In vivo dehydration of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:173-6.
38. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S75-9.
39. Vajdic C, Holden BA, Sweeney DF, Cornish RM. The frequency of ocular symptoms during spectacle and daily soft and rigid contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:705-11.
40. Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, Chalmers R. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:40-6.
41. Maldonado-Codina C, Efron N. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the clinical performance of hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:442-54.
42. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Mann A, Franklin V, Wolffsohn J, Franklin V, Tighe B, Gilmartin B. Clinical and biomechanical changes with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2004;27:98-9.
43. Montero Iruzubieta J, Nebot Ripoll JR, Chiva J, Fernandez OE, Rubio Alvarez JJ, Delgado F, Villa C, Traverso LM. Practical experience with a high Dk lotrafilcon A fluorosilicone hydrogel extended wear contact lens in Spain. CLAO J 2001;27:41-6.
44. Siegel DJ, Spilkin J. A comparison of on-eye performance and patient assessment of the Bausch & Lomb PureVision lens and CIBA Night & Day lens when worn on a 7-day extended wear cycle for a month. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2000;23:162-7.
45. Fonn D, Dumbleton K. Dryness and discomfort with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:5101-4.
46. Purslow C, Wolffsohn JS, Santodomingo-Rubido J. The effect of contact lens wear on dynamic ocular surface temperature. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2005;28:29-36.